Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> TBH I think you should file a review for Fedora anyway. As long as it
> has some working functionality, it is better to have this package than
> to not have a package at all. You can always add new features to a
> package later.
But the package name should get sorted out first. I think it should be
called just mingw32-qt.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
fedora-mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
