Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Tim Fenn changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Bug 497622 depends on bug 510822, which changed state.
Bug 510822 Summary: Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #41 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-05 16:01:47 EDT ---
builds for F-11 and devel done, but EL-5 fails due to arpack not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Dennis Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #39 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-20 16:49:51 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: apb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Tim Fenn changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #38 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-27 15:29:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > (In rep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-27 15:16:26
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > (
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #36 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-27 15:02:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> (In reply to comment #32)
> > > Packa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-27 05:55:48
EDT ---
Before importing, check the stuff in comment #33; I'd add
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-27 05:51:19
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> > Package does not build:
> > R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #32 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-26 21:49:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #30)
> > (In rep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-26 05:37:18
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-25 20:19:11 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> apbs has support for:
> --with-mpic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #29 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-24 05:10:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > Adding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-24 02:47:06
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Adding --with-arpack enables bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #27 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-23 21:42:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> apbs has support for:
> --with-mpic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-23 07:48:47
EDT ---
apbs has support for:
--with-mpich=PATH toplevel MP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #25 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-23 01:33:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > > > Yea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-22 15:48:56
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> > > Yeah, the choices here aren
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-22 13:56:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > > > - p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-22 08:36:27
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> > > - pmgZ and aqua both want t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-11 21:35:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > notes:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-11 21:11:38
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> notes:
> circular dep. problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #19 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-11 20:58:03 EDT ---
OK, here's a shot at the split version of the package:
Spec URL:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #18 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-10 20:44:04 EDT ---
I've made the maloc package as a separate submission:
https://bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Tim Fenn changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #17 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-07 19:33:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > contact
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-07 19:08:23
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> contacted (out of office until
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #15 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-07 19:00:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> If the releases are made along apbs,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 18:25:55
EDT ---
If the releases are made along apbs, then you can just buil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-06 17:50:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Hmm, it seems that aqua is a customiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-06 17:04:21
EDT ---
Hmm, it seems that aqua is a customized version of PMG as p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #11 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-06 12:22:34 EDT ---
Everything is all set except that aqua seems to only be available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:37:17
EDT ---
ping?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #9 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-29 13:30:53 EDT ---
Still waiting for info regarding the licensing on some of the subp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-15 14:29:58 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> ping, any progress?
>
upstream sugge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:13:46
EDT ---
ping, any progress?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-05 00:08:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > MUST: Th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 04:31:04
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > MUST: The License field in the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-04 03:24:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> rpmlint output:
>
> apbs.src:53: W: se
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-02 03:24:56
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
apbs.src:53: W: setup-not-quiet
apbs-devel.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-02 02:48:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - What's this for?
>
> %if %{fedora} <
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
46 matches
Mail list logo
