[Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Milos Jakubicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #16 from Milos Jakubicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 09:08:38 EDT --- Would you mind releasing an update for F8/F9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462458] New: Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 Summary: Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Each user has his/her own workspace, which is accessible by following a My workspace link in the main site navigation, just like the My account link. The workspace interface is tabbed (in the Drupal 6.x version) and shows Content, Comments, and Attachments (attachments are files the user has uploaded with Drupal core's upload module). SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.3-0.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 10:46:59 EDT --- Package built fine in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828097 This package (stk) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033
Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 10:59:55 EDT ---
rpmlint on SRPM:
libmng.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/libmng-1.0.9-7.src.rpm.15198/libmng.spec
The character encoding of the spec file is not UTF-8. Convert it for example
using iconv(1).
libmng.src:41: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options
must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script
supports it.
libmng.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.
rpmlint on RPMS:
libmng.i386: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
libmng.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.
libmng-debuginfo.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.
libmng-devel.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8.
All pretty trivial, but should be fixed.
Source0 should change to:
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
md5sum of provided source and that from upstream differ:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ md5sum libmng-1.0.7.tar.gz
863002cf13a60ccfd8be641b62e3cc58 libmng-1.0.7.tar.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/libmng-1.0.9.tar.gz
ff1205ef70855a75c098ea09690413c6 ../SOURCES/libmng-1.0.9.tar.gz
- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details.
Fix.
Mock build OK, so BuildRequires are fine. No other blockers after full review,
so fix the above and we're set.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:03:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) There are a number of outstanding bugs against the poppler package which block this review. I see one blocker, and it's closed. Clear to review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378
--- Comment #21 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:09:43
EDT ---
It looks better now, but I have found a few small issues. And I also have a
question about which I am not sure.
a) perl has become an useless BR, because it is brought in by perl(Grammar);
b) glibc-common is definitely not needed as BR;
c) you use lots of macros in the {__xx} form, but mv is used as such. Nor a
blocker neither incorrect, but not consistent from a stylish point of view.
d) in the lines
%{__rm} -rf in lib/{CGI,Config,Digest,JSON}
%{__rm} -rf in lib/{SNMP_Session,SNMP_util,BER,JSON}.pm
I assume there is a confusion or a leftover from using find, as rm does not
need or use the in argument. rm -fR in lib/*.. does not fail because of the
-f flag, but you should remove the word in from these lines
Now the preamble of the question: as far as I can see, the newer rpm (2.4.2-3)
removed the requires for
perl(B)
perl(CGI::Session::Driver)
perl(CGI::Session::Driver::DBI)
perl(CGI::Session::ErrorHandler)
perl(Class::Struct)
perl(DBD::Pg)
perl(DB_File)
perl(DBI)
perl(Digest::HMAC)
perl(Digest::SHA1)
perl(File::Spec)
perl(FreezeThaw)
perl(overload)
perl(Scalar::Util)
perl(Test::More)
I do not have the infrastructure on which to test and my perl-fu is rather
weak, so I have to rely to an answer from others: is all the previous
functionality preserved ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:12:13 EDT --- Bug 275541 and Bug 437247 are, in my opinion, relevant for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||275541, 437247 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:21:40 EDT --- Agreed, added as blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:24:30 EDT --- - The name is changed from libMini to mini to reflect Fedora packaging guidelines Which packaging guideline are you refering to ? At least Fedora guideline say that the package name is the name of the source tarball (case sensitive). Thus the name defined in the configure.ac as the package name in the autotools case. But others distribution guideline seems to requires package designed to provide a library (mainly) to have lib as a name prefix(ie Debian). Thus using libMini was a good thing (it help to see what is the purpose and the way it needs to be packaged as). Now if the program is designed to run on mingw or other, maybe it can be named libmini (case insensitive). DXT code... OKay Build Requested to Rawhide: success http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828135 Local test on Fedora 8 x86_64. rpmlint on installed package (see attached) undefined-non-weak-symbol should be fixed at build time (missing -llibrary flag at linking time). unused-direct-shlib-dependency can be fixed using : (between %configure and make within the spec file) # clean unused-direct-shlib-dependencies sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool pkgconfig support in Mini.pc seems fine but gl.pc and glu.pc doesn't exist in F-8 so pkg-config will fails and you will need a workaround. I just wonder if some of theses shouldn't be moved to Libs.private instead ? Then package requirement for -devel should be tweaked. At least libGL, libGLU and libcurl seems required since they are exposed via the API. Not sure if others are relevant. I don't see the aim of doing Cflags: -DNOSQUISH in Mini.pc since this is not used within the API Please use libGL-devel and libGLU-devel instead of mesa-libGL-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel. The Virtual Provides will pick the appropriate version. This is minor for this version, but according to the Mini.pc, the version is 8.8.8. This needs to be set within the rpm package using pre-versioning scheme. (where the release tag is 1). About pre-version, i'm not against, if it is stable enought so we can start working on dependencies within Rawhide... Keep up the good work... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #10 from Darryl L. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:27:27 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 11:50:42 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM: mgetty.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 183, tab: line 179) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Fix, since there's the below to do as well. . . rpmlint on RPMS: The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mgetty.i386: E: non-readable /etc/mgetty+sendfax/dialin.config 0600 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mgetty.i386: E: non-readable /etc/mgetty+sendfax/mgetty.config 0600 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mgetty.i386: E: non-readable /sbin/mgetty 0700 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mgetty.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/mgetty 0700 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. mgetty.i386: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/callback 0700 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mgetty.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/callback 0700 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. mgetty-sendfax.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/fax/incoming fax A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. mgetty-sendfax.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/lib/mgetty+sendfax/faxq-helper fax A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. mgetty-sendfax.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/lib/mgetty+sendfax/faxq-helper fax 04711 The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. mgetty-sendfax.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/mgetty+sendfax/faxq-helper 04711 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. mgetty-sendfax.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/mgetty+sendfax/faxq-helper 04711 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. mgetty-sendfax.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/fax/outgoing fax A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. mgetty-voice.i386: E: non-readable /sbin/vgetty 0700 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mgetty-voice.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/vgetty 0700 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. mgetty-voice.i386: E: non-readable
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 12:03:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) the debug files are in freedink-debuginfo-1.08.20080914-1.fc8.i386.rpm rather than freedink-engine-debuginfo-1.08.20080914-1.fc8.i386.rpm :/ Do you know how to fix this? It is normal. By the way would you also provide your srpm? Also, please remove suse related parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 12:05:01 EDT --- Adding current owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=46 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 12:10:07 EDT --- Well, * As this uses autogen.sh, BuildRequires: libtool automake is needed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=827920 * and it seems that in ExcludeArch comma cannot be used (i.e. ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64) * However even if I add these BuildRequires, this time the build fails. Would you verify it? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828328 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226161] Merge Review: mrtg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226161 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 12:21:58 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM: mrtg.src:22: E: prereq-use vixie-cron The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. mrtg.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 44) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Fix. mrtg.src: W: strange-permission filter-requires-mrtg.sh 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. mrtg.src: W: strange-permission filter-provides-mrtg.sh 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. What are these about? If they're good this way, please document what they do in the spec. rpmlint on RPMS: mrtg.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/whodo/GIFgraph/GIFgraph/samples/sample54.dat mrtg.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/CHANGES Tons of this all over the docs. Fix. mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/TCH/dualpri.pl c:\perl\bin This script uses an incorrect interpreter. mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/TCH/hiperdsp.pl c:\perl\bin This script uses an incorrect interpreter. mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/TCH/dualt1.pl c:\perl\bin This script uses an incorrect interpreter. mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/cfgmaker_cisco/cfgmaker.cisco /pkg/gnu/bin/perl This script uses an incorrect interpreter. mrtg.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. mrtg.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm Fix. License tag should by GPLv2+. Otherwise, full review looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=46 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 12:27:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) * However even if I add these BuildRequires, this time the build fails. Would you verify it? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828328 Not using parallel make seems good: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828362 will check later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #17 from David Kaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 12:42:20 EDT --- Update to 0.1.7: http://kaylor.info/fedora/SPEC/tasque.spec http://kaylor.info/fedora/SRPM/tasque-0.1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 13:05:18 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM and RPMS are clean. Upstream Source is 404 due to namesys.com DNS issues, but md5sum matches kernel.org version, which I think is Good Enough under the circumstances. Any reason it's called reiserfs-utils and not the upstream reiserfsprogs? I assume some sort of fs-util nameing convention? If so, document in spec. Otherwise, full review is great, very tidy package, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461728] Review Request: fet - Open source free timetabling software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461728 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 13:11:13 EDT --- Okay. One comment: * It is better that you once remove all .qm files at %prep. + builds successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=827918 + spec/srpm good + can be installed correctly + seems to work well --- This package (fet) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225799] Merge Review: gimp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225799 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 13:14:47 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM: gimp.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/gimp-2.4.7-1.fc9.src.rpm.25429/gimp.spec The character encoding of the spec file is not UTF-8. Convert it for example using iconv(1). Fix. gimp.src:60: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gimp2 The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. gimp.src:156: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gimp2-devel The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. These are PROBABLY Ok. gimp.src:439: E: files-attr-not-set A file or a directory entry in a %files section does not have attributes set which may result in security issues in the resulting binary package depending on the system where the package is built. Add default attributes using %defattr before it in the %files section, or use per line %attr's. Fix. gimp.src:1282: W: macro-in-%changelog files Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly rewriting history on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. gimp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 198) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. gimp.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8. Cosmetic, but worth fixing. rpmlint on RPMS: gimp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/pyconsole.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. Fix. gimp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gimp-2.4.7/Wilber_Construction_Kit.xcf.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). gimp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gimp-2.4.7/Wilber.xcf.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). gimp.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8. Fix. gimp.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided gimp2 If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. gimp.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided gimp-beta If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. gimp.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided gimp-perl If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. Fix. gimp-debuginfo.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/gimp-2.4.7/plug-ins/imagemap/imap_ncsa.y This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file
[Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=46 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #13 from Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 14:04:54 EDT --- Hi, Too bad the debug info can't be added to the -engine package. The SRPMS are in the same directory: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/ More precisely: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink-1.08.20080914-1.fc8.src.rpm http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc-3.1.20080914-1.fc8.src.rpm http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink-data-1.08.20080914-1.fc8.src.rpm For the suse parts, I maintain the spec file for both distros, so it would be slower and error-prone to split and duplicate them, unless there's a problem that I didn't see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 14:26:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: stk Short Description: Synthesis ToolKit in C++ Owners: thm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #14 from Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 14:28:45 EDT --- http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc-3.1.20080914-1.fc8.src.rpm Hmm, that's a mistake in my build. The right one is: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink-dfarc-3.1.20080914-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 14:59:18 EDT --- avogadro-0.8.1-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avogadro-0.8.1-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378
--- Comment #22 from Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 14:57:25 EDT
---
a) perl has become an useless BR, because it is brought in by perl(Grammar);
perl(Grammar) is req, not br?
perl is not used in building anyway, removed.
b) glibc-common is definitely not needed as BR;
needed for iconv (or do you mean glibc-common is always available?)
c) you use lots of macros in the {__xx} form, but mv is used as such. Nor a
blocker neither incorrect, but not consistent from a stylish point of view.
fixed.
d) in the lines
%{__rm} -rf in lib/{CGI,Config,Digest,JSON}
%{__rm} -rf in lib/{SNMP_Session,SNMP_util,BER,JSON}.pm
cut-n-paste error, fixed.
Now the preamble of the question: as far as I can see, the newer rpm (2.4.2-3)
removed the requires for
perl(B)
perl(CGI::Session::Driver)
perl(CGI::Session::Driver::DBI)
perl(CGI::Session::ErrorHandler)
perl(Class::Struct)
perl(DBD::Pg)
perl(DB_File)
perl(DBI)
perl(Digest::HMAC)
perl(Digest::SHA1)
perl(File::Spec)
perl(FreezeThaw)
perl(overload)
perl(Scalar::Util)
perl(Test::More)
I do not have the infrastructure on which to test and my perl-fu is rather
weak, so I have to rely to an answer from others: is all the previous
functionality preserved ?
With all the external modules removed this is not surprising, these
requirements
are now pushed into the modules smokeping depends on (I hope :-).
spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping.spec
srpm:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=828581name=smokeping-2.4.2-4.fc10.src.rpm
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828580
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462505] New: Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462505 Summary: Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-argparse.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-argparse-0.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Argparse takes the best of the optparse command-line parsing module and brings it new life. Argparse adds positional as well as optional arguments, the ability to create parsers for sub-commands, more informative help and usage messages, and much more. At the same time, it retains the ease and flexibility of use that made optparse so popular. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 Chris Feist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #8 from Chris Feist [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 15:25:12 EDT --- I've verified that Jason's requests have made it into the 0.91-3 src rpm. And the .spec file looks good to me with no rpmlint output. I'm marking this packages as approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Chris Feist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225799] Merge Review: gimp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225799 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 16:26:32 EDT --- Mock build good, BRs are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462521] New: Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 Summary: Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/simplyhtml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/simplyhtml-0.12.3-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: SimplyHTML is an application and a java component for rich text processing. It stores documents as HTML files in combination with Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). SimplyHTML is not intended to be used as an editor for web pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462523] New: Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 Summary: Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-prioritized-methods.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-prioritized-methods-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides four decorators: `prioritized_when`, `prioritized_around`, `prioritized_before`, and `prioritized_after`. These behave like their `peak.rules` counterparts except that they accept an optional `prio` argument which can be used to provide a comparable object (usually an integer) that will be used to disambiguate situations in which more than rule applies to the given arguments and no rule is more specific than another. That is, situations in which an `peak.rules.AmbiguousMethods` would have been raised. This is useful for libraries which want to be extensible via generic functions but want their users to easily override a method without figuring out how to write a more specific rule or when it is not feasible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 17:10:59 EDT --- Hi, I missed the emails telling me someone was reviewing this. Sorry. I've updated unbound to version 1.0.2 Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm As for your comments: - hiding the gcc command is what upstream does. It is not something we do. - the rm command is used because unbound creates these files on startup. I will look into pre-creating these as part of the package, so they are removed when the package is uninstalled without using the rm command manually. - the static library does not need shipping in the -devel package, i remove it in the next release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #7 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 17:11:58 EDT --- I'll also update the user addition scheme to comply with the new packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #1 from John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 17:11:52 EDT --- This package has a dependency on javahelp2 which currently exists in the devel tree. Thus, this package would be targeted only for rawhide and F10. (I'm not certain how does a case like this get handled.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462529] New: Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Summary: Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-feedcache.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-feedcache-1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A class to wrap Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module so that parameters can be used to cache the feed results locally instead of fetching the feed every time it is requested. Uses both etag and modified times for caching. The cache is parameterized to use different backend storage options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462530] Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462530 --- Comment #1 from John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 17:47:53 EDT --- Just a note: despite the summary, this package is a dependency for the freemind-0.9.0 beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462530] New: Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462530 Summary: Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/jarbundler.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/jarbundler-2.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: How many times has this happened to you? You've written a little Java utility, or maybe even a more complex application, and you want to create Mac OS X application bundle for easy distribution. You'd like to be able to do it automatically from your build process, but you're forced to go run the Apple Jar Bundler and tweak all the settings manually every time you build. Well no more! JarBundler is a feature-rich Ant task which will create a Mac OS X application bundle from a list of Jar files and a main class name. You can add an Icon resource, set various Mac OS X native look-and-feel bells and whistles, and maintain your application bundles as part of your normal build and release cycle. It is free software licensed under the Apache License. This release is based on the earlier work of Seth Morabito. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462535] New: Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Summary: Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Foolscap (aka newpb) is a new version of Twisted's native RPC protocol, known as 'Perspective Broker'. This allows an object in one process to be used by code in a distant process. This module provides data marshaling, a remote object reference system, and a capability-based security model. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 18:36:47 EDT --- ref glibc-common: it is safe to assume it is always present in the buildroot. how many systems or build logs have you seen which work without THE core set of libs ? except for the Qooxdoo problem (it is still a private lib and the guidelines forbit that), everything else seems fine to me. I think it's time to call for external help, because I am not sure how to proceed. Strictly following the rules would impose that the older Qooxdoo should be made available as a package and become a Require of smokeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:19:22 EDT --- php-pear-Event-Dispatcher-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461335] Review Request: csstidy - CSS parser and optimizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461335 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:20:39 EDT --- csstidy-1.4-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:19:12 EDT --- python-markdown-1.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:20:52 EDT --- php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461428] Review Request: orsa - Orbit Reconstruction, Simulation and Analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461428 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:20:25 EDT --- orsa-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update orsa'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8083 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:21:03 EDT --- puritan-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:20:30 EDT --- merkaartor-0.11-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:24:04 EDT --- tcl-tile-0.8.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461335] Review Request: csstidy - CSS parser and optimizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461335 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:21:30 EDT --- csstidy-1.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:25:27 EDT --- evolution-rspam-0.0.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:22:08 EDT --- php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:22:52 EDT --- php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #24 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:24:14 EDT --- I think it's so easy to comply with the packaging rules that we really should do it. The only required thing to do is to package JSONRPC.pm from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qooxdoo/qooxdoo-0.7.3-backend.zip (linked from http://qooxdoo.org/download_0_7 ). Just name it qooxdoo-backend-0.7 or qooxdoo-backend-compat or something similar ( in case someone packages version 0.8 which is not directly API compatible), make sure it provides JSONRPC.pm and I think that is all. Opinions, anyone ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:24:27 EDT --- tcl-snack-2.2.10-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:21:38 EDT --- php-pear-Event-Dispatcher-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:25:21 EDT --- php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461709] Review Request: rsstool - Command-line RSS/Atom parser and generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461709 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:30:21 EDT --- tcl-snack-2.2.10-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:29:18 EDT --- tcl-tile-0.8.2-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:28:59 EDT --- python-markdown-1.7-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461709] Review Request: rsstool - Command-line RSS/Atom parser and generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461709 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:26:38 EDT --- rsstool-1.0.0-1.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:28:07 EDT --- drupal-views-6.x.2.0-0.1.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461709] Review Request: rsstool - Command-line RSS/Atom parser and generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461709 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:26:02 EDT --- rsstool-1.0.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #3 from Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 19:53:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.0-3.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 16 2008 Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.8.0-3 - Cleaned up the UTF-8 conversion - Use optflags for building - Use _datadir/X11/app-defaults instead of _sysconfdir/X11/app-defaults - Added semicolon to Categories in the desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458939] Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #17 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:09:45 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:10:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 Marcela, what is the status of this package for F-9 and F-8? I can't find them in anywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461571] sugar-log -- Log activity for sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461571 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:11:59 EDT --- Simon, Can you please add the CVS request in the specified format please. It helps to cvs admin to determine a lot of things EXAMPLE New Package CVS Request === Package Name: foo Short Description: foo bar foo Owners: bar Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462043] Review Request: rcssserver - Robocup 2D Soccer Simulation Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462043 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:21:59 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462255] Review Request: hunspell-tn - Tswana hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462255 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:30:30 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #20 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:15:55 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #26 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:39:59 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - A clone of Warlords II
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: lordsawar - |Review Request: lordsawar - |A clone of Warlords II |Turn-based strategy game in ||a fantasy setting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - A clone of Warlords II
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 00:01:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lordsawar/0.1.1-2/lordsawar.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lordsawar/0.1.1-2/lordsawar-0.1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm * Tue Sep 16 2008 Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.1.1-2 - Summary and description changed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462560] New: Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 Summary: Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/xmlpull-api.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f9/xmlpull-api-1.1.4b-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API that was designed for simplicity and very good performance both in constrained environment such as defined by J2ME and on server side when used in J2EE application servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 --- Comment #1 from John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 00:16:21 EDT --- I do have a small question about how the release tag should be numbered. On the upstream web site, they only have downloadable ZIP files for versions up to 1.1.3.4c. However, in their CVS tree they have tags for 1_1_4 and 1_1_4b. (I grabbed that last tag as I documented in the .spec file.) Since, I grabbed the code out of CVS, should there be a cvs string in the release, or is that not necessary since I was grabbing a specific CVS tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462523] Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447844] Review Request: krazy2 - KDE code checking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447844 --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 00:45:52 EDT --- I no longer need sponsored. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447844] Review Request: krazy2 - KDE code checking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447844 Ben Boeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462564] New: Review Request: hdf5 - A general purpose library and file format for storing scientific data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hdf5 - A general purpose library and file format for storing scientific data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462564 Summary: Review Request: hdf5 - A general purpose library and file format for storing scientific data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/hdf5.spec SRPM URL: http://www.krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/hdf5-1.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: 1. Version bumped to 1.8.1. 2. There is a minor problem with the spec file: At this time, the %install step requires the export QA_RPATHS=0x0001, otherwise the %install step fails. I don't know much about the internals of RPATHs. Probably before release the QA_RPATHS would need to be fixed (I don't know how at this time). 3. Installable RPMS (i386 x86_64): http://www.krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/i386/hdf5-1.8.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm http://www.krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/x86_64/hdf5-1.8.1-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm 4. Devel RPMS (i386 x86_64): http://www.krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/x86_64/hdf5-devel-1.8.1-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm http://www.krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/i386/hdf5-devel-1.8.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450371] Review Request: sigen - Strategy/RPG game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 Ben Boeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #44 from Ben Boeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 00:55:09 EDT --- I assume you have to enable CVS access. My FAS account is mathstuf. I don't see myself as part of the packager group yet (or do I have to apply first?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462523] Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 01:23:46 EDT --- * Package named according to naming guidelines * spec named according to naming guidelines * Package is MIT licensed * Spec is legible American English * tarball matches upstream * No locale files * Not a shared library * Not relocatable * Package builds on i386 * Package owns all directories that it creates and none another package creates * No duplicate files * Permissions in files set properly * Macros used consistently * code not content * Not a GUI app * Proper %install and %clean * Proper UTF-8/ASCii encoding all around. * No scriptlets x You should query upstream to include a separate LICENSE file in the tarball * Builds in mock rpmlint: python-prioritized-methods.noarch: W: no-documentation No documentation exists in the upstream tarball so this is ignorable. Also note, this package depends on a bunch of python-peak-* packages which are built in koji but not submitted for updates in bodhi. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447844] Review Request: krazy2 - KDE code checking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447844 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 01:36:47 EDT --- (Re-adding NEEDSPONSOR: see my comment on bug 450371) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450371] Review Request: sigen - Strategy/RPG game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 01:36:55 EDT --- Well, as said on my comment 40, you have to either - pre-review other persion's review request - or submit another review request of yours so as to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines before getting sponsored. This is one review request and for your case I am waiting for you to update bug 447844 (i.e. your another review request). Once re-setting NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447844] Review Request: krazy2 - KDE code checking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447844 Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-17 01:46:45 EDT --- Of course this fails, the make PREFIX=/usr install for the plugins doesn't use RPM_BUILD_ROOT anywhere, so they aren't installed to the right place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
