[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-01 06:49 EST --- As requested, I've taken up building a new package for this, it is almost complete. You can check it out over at bug #273701. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-24 00:48 EST --- hmm. another long discussed review got DEAD-REVIEW status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-21 19:19 EST --- Closing this, as there seems to be no interest in picking this up. New takers should file a new review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-14 03:14 EST --- Looking at the SVN branch for SLED10 SP1 bugfixes the version they are at currently is 0.9.8. http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-main-menu/branches/SLED10-SP1/ I compiled this branch on Fedora as I enjoyed using it while I was testing SLED10 SP1, currently there are a few problems. 1) It doesn't display the Applications context 2) The status field for harddrive displays 0mb of 0mb 3) It has issues with translations, long strings get cut off Outside of that this works rather well out of the box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-23 15:25 EST --- Has anyone updated this to the latest SVN version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-23 15:26 EST --- Has anyone updated this to the latest SVN version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-23 16:10 EST --- No, would you like to give it a shot ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-23 16:13 EST --- I might give it a try over the next few days if i get a chance, I'm really looking forward to trying the new more usable slab menu. Is there any word on the versioning scheme yet? What version is the new SLAB package for SLED? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-02 12:15 EST --- Chris, do you think you'll have time to complete this submission ? If not, is anyone interested in taking over the package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-22 02:12 EST --- I am using the 0.6.3 0.6.4 code, there are issues with Recent documents. i.e. from nautilus open a file, initially it does not appear on the slab recent documents panel, until you open another document i.e. something not getting refreshed correctly I am currently using the patches from gentoo(issues appear with either), slightly modified http://gentoo-fldc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gnome-extra/gnome-main-menu/files/ Has anyone else seen this issue with Recent Documents? If anyone wants I can post these patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-13 09:42 EST --- Chris, are you still up to do the review ? A quick note first: in the devel package section: those should be Requires:, not BuildRequires:, and i don't think automake should be in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-15 14:46 EST --- Any progress on this? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-28 04:58 EST --- Package should probably renamed gnome-main-menu since this is what upstream wants to call it and this is heading for a potential merge in the next gnome version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-27 18:13 EST --- Is anything happening with packaging this one up? I think upstream released 0.6.3 some days ago... Thanks, David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 18:52 EST --- There has been some fantastic work done on this package by Chris Slab Chabot and Parag An, with the help of very constructive functionality reviews done by Rahul and others. I think this has reached a state where it can be reviewed (in the traditional packaging/spec sense) and released to the end users, and further development and discussion can happen in bugzilla tickets filed against specific problems or enhancements. - the CVS version of gnome-main-menu is now at 0.6.3, Chris were you planning on integrating the patches into a more recent version ? (not a request, just asking) - if you do, you may want to use an RPM versioning such as 0.6.3-0.20061003.1, so that if upstream ever decides to tag their tree and make an official release, 0.6.3-1 will be greater. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-10 01:50 EST --- Hi Denis, If the cvs version is not a to major departure from 0.6.2, i'll intergrate it this evening, if it is a relativly large change, it might take some rebasing of some huge patches, so then it would have to wait until the weekend :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 06:31 EST --- The recent applications functionality is obviously broken at present due to the lack of recent applications support in gnome. The patches located here; http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ appear to be developed against gnome 2.12, is there any chance that they will be updated against 2.16 and HEAD in order to ensure they are included in the gnome upstream? Also if they were to be re-written to match with the 2.16 sources then it would be conceivable to include them in the next gnome build for fedora. While they are waiting for gnome approval. Has anyone attempted to port these patches? If so any estimates on what is required to reach full functionality? I may have a few hours to work on this over the weekend and would be interested in finding out whether or not I am duplicating effort. After a quick glance over the patches it seems like the work is straight forward unless I hit library changes. If I were to embark on this re-write I will build against the latest fedora source rpms from devel (should match latest gnome release), and provide patches here and on gnome bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 08:31 EST --- There is no recent applications functionality in the spec provided for review. Rewritting and updating it for 2.16 is non trivial and is a separate open RFE #200863. We dont need to wait for this since the current spec has replaced recent applications with recent documents as you can see in the above comments. The only thing required here would be a packaging review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-29 03:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #48) Ok it took a while b/c real life job took a to big toll on my time, but i've finaly found some time to 'finish' this package. Upstream (SuSe) had a new version (even though they still call it 0.6.2) which intergrates a lot of fixes from SLED, but they also reformatted all the source code and changed the library sources quite a bit, so i've had to re-base all the patches by hand, which took a bit of time :-) One of the 'major' bugs it fixes is that on startup 'Favorite Applications' would only show 6 entries, even if more were defined; This seems to work 'correctly' now, and it will show all fav applications on startup now. The new package can be found at: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-3.src.rpm I found only this as latest package to review here. I tried mock build for i386 development an dgot following results aclocal:configure.in:16: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library configure.in:16: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1788 (%build) Am i missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-29 08:11 EST --- Good catch, this was caused by some missing build-requires (nl: libtool, intltools, wireless-tools). Added those and uploaded the fixed releases to. To make things more interesting, in fedora-devel its wireless-tools-devel and in fc5 its just wireless-tools, so i've added some distro specific conditional BR's to make it work in both situations; After these modifications, it mock builds correctly again under fc5 fc6/devel The results can be found at at: http://chabotc.nl/slab/slab.spec http://chabotc.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 11:12 EST --- Created an attachment (id=134825) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134825action=view) poor font rendering example -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 11:14 EST --- I'm getting poor font rendering in slab. See previous attachment. Under FC5. It's not the standard font but Maiandra GD. I don't see the poor font rendering anywhere else on my desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 11:18 EST --- Sorry to spam but I guess it could be just bad looking bolding? Or non standard bolding? I just tried bolding some text in an html email in evolution with the same font and it looked fine even at different sizes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 09:25 EST --- Ok it took a while b/c real life job took a to big toll on my time, but i've finaly found some time to 'finish' this package. Upstream (SuSe) had a new version (even though they still call it 0.6.2) which intergrates a lot of fixes from SLED, but they also reformatted all the source code and changed the library sources quite a bit, so i've had to re-base all the patches by hand, which took a bit of time :-) One of the 'major' bugs it fixes is that on startup 'Favorite Applications' would only show 6 entries, even if more were defined; This seems to work 'correctly' now, and it will show all fav applications on startup now. The new package can be found at: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-3.src.rpm The re-based re-worked patches are: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/gnome-main-menu-0.6.2-fedora.patch http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/gnome-main-menu-0.6.2-disable-add-to-startup.patch I've made the second one seperate, because i hope 'add to startup' actions will be fixed soon(ish) by upstream, and this way it'll be easier to back out :-) I've also changed the network button action from redhat-neat-control to redhat-neat (aka system-config-network). (In reply to comment #47) The suspend button should show up if g-p-m reports it has this capability, else the button is hidden (In reply to comment #46) I've changed slab (aka gnome-main-menu) to use the vendor supplied default main menu icon, when using an fedora theme this will be the fedora logo, however other themes can override this and put their own icon there.. In your case i think tango inherits the default gnome iconset, and doesn't define the main menu icon, so it uses the fall back one (from default gnome). If you changed tango to inherit bluecurve, gnome, then you should keep the fedora logo there Do note that the package version now is: 0.6.2-3. This is *not* a mistake, the previous packager choose 1.0 as a uneducated guess, the upstream version number is 0.6.2, which is the tarbal this is based on. To fix this please run: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage /location/to/rpms/slab-*.rpm The 'cvsMMDD' tag was dropped since its now based on SuSe's gnome-main-menu tarbal, and not a cvs checkout (which btw has the License: GPL tag, so this was an available option) I'd think this package is finally ready for review now :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 09:28 EST --- Woops the previous comment was by me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but i noticed to late bugzilla was still logged in using Hans's account (he's spend many hours here last weekend to fix a number of dm-raid / mkinitrd bugs). Logged out as hans and logged in under the correct account again :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 09:40 EST --- Can you add a link to Pup near to the Pirut entry in the sidebar? I am done with the functionality review. Someone else has to review the packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 09:43 EST --- I was hoping the default enabled (i think?) puplet would be good enough for the software updating part (?) i'd like to keep the # of entries in the right column (system commands) to a minimun, else it'll only become scary and confusing to end users again to have so many options there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 09:54 EST --- Puplet is there only in FC6. I believe this package would also be pushed into the FE-5 branch. Its quite useful to have the ability the directly launch pup atleast in FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 14:51 EST --- Why not add just one item called something like Leave that groups all stuff like shutdown, reboot, suspend, logout, lock screen, ... It also shows the harddisk usage of my /boot partition, which is pretty useless, this should be the partition where /home is located. But it starts to look very nice! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-22 15:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #53) Why not add just one item called something like Leave that groups all stuff like shutdown, reboot, suspend, logout, lock screen, ... Hi Bart, thanks for the comments, and its a good idea but please don't confuse me for 'upstream', i'm just the fedora packager who's trying to intergrate an existing product into fedora. SuSe's is upstream, so thats the place where you could report your sugestions :-) It also shows the harddisk usage of my /boot partition, which is pretty useless, this should be the partition where /home is located. Hmm heard such things before and have such a problem my self too .. i'll try to take a look into it, but i suspect its just an 'gnome-main-menu' bug that exists upstream too, so no guarantee's :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-09 03:57 EST --- There seems to be a packaging mistake here. #rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.i386.rpm Preparing...### [100%] package slab-1.0-5.20060721cvs (which is newer than slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs) is already installed Suspend menu item doesnt show up which I click log out. Log out was called Exit in the previous package. I am not sure calling neat is useful for the end user. They usually wouldnt be setting up profiles. If the network is wireless, it should probably call Network Manager instead although the user interface is a applet which isnt suitable for direct interaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-07 10:21 EST --- One other thing with this new version. I use the Unofficial Tango icon set and I guess because you recently switched to using the Fedora icon instead of the Computer icon, I get two shoe prints instead of a computer icon for the applet on the panel. OK, I just looked at my Add to Panel dialog and it seems you're probably using the Main Menu icon, which when using the clearlooks icon theme is the same as the Menu Bar icon (fedora symbol). Under tango though, Main Menu is two shoe prints while Menu Bar is the Gnome foot. Would it be possible if not using the Computer Icon to use the Menu Bar icon? This must be one of those icon naming things that will eventually be straightened out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: slab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 08:33 EST ---
Finally a new version available, work and not being horribly experianced in GTK
hacking made for a little slower progress.
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.src.rpm
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec
Also all the current patches are available to browse at:
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/
Latest changes:
* Sun Aug 6 2006 Chris Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.6.2-2.20060801cvs
- Changed icon to gnome-main-menu instead of gnome-fs-client
- Fixed typo in applet description
- Fixed mixed spaces/tabs in spec file
- Renamed applet name from Slab Main Menu to Computer Menu
- Changed menu icon size to GTK_ICON_SIZE_{SMALL,LARGE}_TOOLBAR based
on the current panel size, instread of GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU
- made Computer label on the menu button optional
(gconfkey location: desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu/show_menu_label)
I've created a show_menu_label gconf key to show or hide the Computer label
since, well i prefer it without, however since i don't want to double-guess
novells usability research i did leave it on by default.
The new show_menu_label key together with the (finally!) fixed icon size of the
panel applet, means its now a drop in replacement for the regular gnome main
menu.
Also the dbus-glib-devel BR has been nuked, wasn't required in the end :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 08:38 EST --- Woops one change that i almost forgot to include: - Changed network control to call redhat-neat-control.desktop Its included in the patches srpm new Still need to investigate how to make a 'suspend' button (what gnome services call to make to do such a thing), but working on it :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 11:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) Also, any custom applications added to the default list of favorite applications is not retained on reboot. The context menu on the application browser says Remove from favorites but the favorites list doesnt show the application. Removing and readding it works. The bug was even a bit weirder then that, if you were to add one more favorite after reboot, all old fav's plus the new one would show up again Turns out on initial load, it limits the amount of 'tiles' there to 6 by default, then on drag and drop, adding or removing, etc it 'refreshes' the area, and notices it should show all the other buttons too As a temporary solution i've patched the schemas file to default to 'limit to 128 entries', this way 'hell should freeze over' (and you screen being very full) before this limit is hit, and the issue manifests its self again. Might try to come up with a 'better solution' sometime, but for now this will do i think. Uploaded the latest changes to the same place again: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.src.rpm http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 12:09 EST --- Add / remove from startup seems to suffer from the same kind of confusion. if you add a application to 'startup automaticly' the links are created propperly, and app will be started ok on login, however the label isn't updated to 'remove from startup' untill you restart the slab menu. Quite confusing for the end user, so disabled this functionality for now, but will keep it on my 'to fix somewhere in the future' list :-) Update in the usual location -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: slab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 16:30 EST ---
Ok the biggest patch is done too, it now has a Suspend button in the system
list, took a few hours to make that happen though :-)
Result at:
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-2.20060801cvs.src.rpm
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec
Slab suspend patch:
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.suspend.patch
All patches sources at:
http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/
Full list of today's changes:
* Sun Aug 6 2006 Chris Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.6.2-2.20060801cvs
- Changed icon to gnome-main-menu instead of gnome-fs-client
- Fixed typo in applet description
- Fixed mixed spaces/tabs in spec file
- Renamed applet name from Slab Main Menu to Computer Menu
- Changed network control to call redhat-neat-control.desktop
- Changed menu icon size to GTK_ICON_SIZE_{SMALL,LARGE}_TOOLBAR based
on the current panel size, instread of GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU
- made Computer label on the menu button optional
(gconfkey location: desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu/show_menu_label)
- Changed itemlimit to 128 by default (was 6)
- Removed add/remove from startup menu's, wasn't updating menu labels
until after restart
- Added Suspend button to System menu actual g-p-m suspend code
based on gnome-panel's implimentation
Will do a final runover tomorrow or tuesday (work permitting) and might just
call it 'ready for review'! :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 17:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #20) Looking good. How do you choose which hard drive to display? It probably makes sense to display the partition of the users home directory. (It looks like it may be defaulting to the first ext2 partition which is my /boot partition. Or maybe it's defaulting to that because my home dir is nfs mounted?) Ps i looked into this and it uses 'g_get_home_dir' to determine what drive to show, devhelp tells me: Note that in contrast to traditional UNIX tools, this function prefers passwd entries over the HOME environment variable. Hope that awnsers your question -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 17:37 EST --- Maybe that function doesn't like LVM or something because it's not working on my laptop either. My account is in the local password file and the home dir is on an lvm /home partition. I don't know if it matters or not but this is on FC5. I assume it's working fine for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-06 18:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #44) Maybe that function doesn't like LVM or something because it's not working on my laptop either. My account is in the local password file and the home dir is on an lvm /home partition. I don't know if it matters or not but this is on FC5. I assume it's working fine for you? That depends, on my home computer with dm-raid volumes, it also doesn't show the correct hd stats (ie: none), however on my laptop and work computer with normal hd setups it works fine. Maybe worth an upstream gnome bug report? I'll check and if the problem is there, file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 11:34 EST --- Also, any custom applications added to the default list of favorite applications is not retained on reboot. The context menu on the application browser says Remove from favorites but the favorites list doesnt show the application. Removing and readding it works. The slab menu description in the gnome add to panel dialog box has a typo - featurefull. It can say Feature rich instead. 20060801cvs package requires dbus-glib-devel which doesnt exist on a FC5 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 14:55 EST --- Will investigate on the favorite applications, 'it works well here'. but i'll check on a few more computers including on a FC5 one.. Guess the dbus-glib-devel BR could be conditional? i'll run it thru mock without and see how it performs without that BR Thanks for the spelling sugestion, i'll incorperate that asap expect to have the next release out, with a few more fixes, tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 20:19 EST --- The exit item in the side bar doesnt show suspend as a option. We need that there since the gnome main menu bar does provide it in FC5 and above currently. I am not sure how SUSE (as slab upstream) integrates suspend in their system. Might be worth looking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 18:43 EST --- Consider calling the applet name in the GNOME applet list as Computer Menu instead of slab menu since slab is basically a internal code name. Also look at http://www.zephyrwood.org/chanders/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-01 10:25 EST --- Work so far today: * Tue Aug 1 2006 Chris Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.6.2-1.20060801cvs - Changed version to actual upstream version - Reworked requires/buildrequires - Formatted spec file - Changed package manger patch, made remove/update menu items optional incase these will some day be posible thru pup / pirut - Added patch to DocPath, to support X-Gnome-DocPath in .desktop files too - Changed network click to call system-config-network, and added requires spec file looks a bit cleaner now too, (build/)requires are a bit saner now, mock builds cleanly and rpmlint is happy too.. Also renamed the version to 0.6.2, thats whats reported internally in slab :-) Will have some more time hopefully tonight to knock a few more things of the todolist. updated spec/srpm: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-1.20060801cvs.src.rpm Not finished yet, but getting closer step by step :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-01 16:42 EST --- Ps thanks to the Docpath + X-Gnome-DocPath patch i made to support normal gnome (vs suse custom) help file paths, it seems to work to work well again (though you need to remove re-add the applet to make it take affect) However not everything has a document file associated with it, so the results arn't as overwelming as they could have been .. on my rawhide system (with quite a bit installed) i get: # grep DocPath *.desktop evince.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath= gnome-cd.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-cd/gnome-cd.xml gnome-dictionary.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-dictionary/gnome-dictionary.xml gnome-eog.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=eog/eog.xml gnome-file-roller.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=file-roller/file-roller.xml gnome-gcalctool.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gcalctool/gcalctool.xml gnome-gedit.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gedit/gedit.xml gnome-search-tool.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-search-tool/gnome-search-tool.xml gnome-system-log.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-system-log/gnome-system-log.xml gnome-terminal.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gnome-terminal/index.html gnome-volume-control.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gst-mixer/gnome-volume-control.xml gthumb.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=gthumb/gthumb.xml rhythmbox.desktop:X-GNOME-DocPath=rhythmbox/rhythmbox.xml Still, its a start :-) Todo is still: - Replacing computer icon on panel with fedora one - make system-config-network .desktop file include it, main package doesnt have it (and is needed to make it called from main menu) - Add few more fedora standard places to places menu - Consider to keep 'autostart' menu's or patch them out.. - Hopefully enable recently-used, but depends on patches being included in panel/desktop - Still waiting reply from Jeremy on pirut/pup functionality, made package commands optional (instead of flat out removing them), if gconf key of those commands is empty, their not shown in the context menu ps if you don't see 'Search' in the main menu (as you reported Sundaram) then start 'beagled' and it will show up :-) Slab is actually quite smart about showing/hiding functionality based on whats available, i'm impressed by that :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-02 01:31 EST --- As Chris Chabot has worked a lot on this package, i would like to give up maintainership of this package to him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 08:45 EST --- Some initial investigation into slab intergration: The control center is still an old gnome 2.12.3 call, and got changed in 2.14, this patch (to slab) should solve this problem: --- control-center/src/control-center.c +++ control-center/src/control-center.c @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ } AppShellData *app_data = - appshelldata_new (preferences.menu, NULL, + appshelldata_new (settings.menu, NULL, CONTROL_CENTER_PREFIX, GTK_ICON_SIZE_DIALOG); generate_categories (app_data); Second problem is the non working updater, enough discussion already in this thread about this, so no need to cover that again, short is that it has to be changed to use pup :-) Next 'big' problem is the recently used applications, there's 2 ways of dealing with this that i can think of. The ubuntu way: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Slab?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=places.patch It replaces the recently used applications functionality with 'places' functionality .. not a horrible way to go, but not as fancy as true 'recently used apps' though :-) The second option, which i think is the argually 'better way' is to intergrate the developed patches for the gnome panel and gnome desktop into fedora's .. and have an actual working 'recent applications' :-) Patches can be viewed here: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 08:51 EST --- The major problem i am facing is not updater but i wonder how can using that main-menu-rug.desktop icon which is given task to execute updater will display main-menu window as given in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Slab ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 10:08 EST --- I've done some work creating some patches inspired by, or straightly ported from Ubuntu's work on slab, i've put the result of the work so far (definatly not completed yet) here: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-1.0-5.20060721cvs.src.rpm Patch list is growing nicely, but its not complete yet, still missing some icons, and not all buttons are perfect yet.. to be continued tomorrow i think (depending on how my full time job will demand my time :-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 15:15 EST --- Worked on it a littlebit more and its getting damned close to being truely 'usable', its even made my own panel perminently now :-) All the buttons work as expected now, recent documents, places, application browser, control-center, help, addremove programs, etc ... Changes and patches (8 now so far, but not done yet :-)) * Mon Jul 31 2006 Chris Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED]- 1.0-5.20060721cvs - Shortend .desktop install a bit - Fixed (build)requires, gtk1 isn't required - s/recent apps/places patch - Patched menu names (s/install software/addremove/, s/logout/exit/). - Patched menu logo to distributer's logo. - Patched menu name to Slab main menu (temporary to avoid confusion) - Patched control-center.c to use settings.menu instead of preferences.menu - Patched schema to use fedora's apps for actions - Patched application browser context menu to hide unused actions To be honest i wouldn't mind taking over this package, or co-maintaining it with you Parag, i love trying to make Fedora more user friendly, and this seems like a worthwhile endevour to help to work on this, plus i'm starting to feel quite 'familiar' with its inner workings after so much patching :-) Anyhow let me know how you feel about this please, i would hate to step on anyone's toe's, but i'd also love to give my best to make sure slab in fedora becomes a very usable tool :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 15:21 EST --- You havent submitted the new srpm and spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 15:26 EST --- *midair collision* Original post read (awnsering your question :-)) ps spec and src.rpm are available at the same location as before: http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-1.0-5.20060721cvs.src.rpm Todo is to hack the application-browser context menu too (so far i've only hacked out the un-usable menu options out of the main menu), fix the computer logo to be the fedora logo and some other minor spit and polish (requires to include all defaut apps, use system-config-network instead of gnome-network-settings, some minor rpmlint errors, and an invalid en_* translation location..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 15:29 EST --- Also considering changing slab to have 'update software' in the main right colom (calling pup), else end users might never find it.. and pirut doestn't update yet does it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 15:35 EST --- Yes, Pup is the software updater and Pirut is the package manager. They use the same source package and share the code base so there is no point is Pirut doing updates too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 15:50 EST --- Looking good. How do you choose which hard drive to display? It probably makes sense to display the partition of the users home directory. (It looks like it may be defaulting to the first ext2 partition which is my /boot partition. Or maybe it's defaulting to that because my home dir is nfs mounted?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 16:40 EST --- From what i understand it -should- show the disk stats for your home dir ... would make sense to from usability perspective .. I'll dig into that if thats indeed the behaviour or no tomorrow (and if not, if we can change it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 17:34 EST --- slab menu doesnt show fedora logo No search functionality in the slab menu (use beagle) Recently used has been replaced with places. We probably need to provide them both as options. Help option doesnt work (use yelp) Application browser context menu doesnt offer to uninstall (call pirut) or upgrade (call pup) the application and help is unavailable in the context menu in all of the application listed in the application browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: slab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 19:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
slab menu doesnt show fedora logo
WIP
No search functionality in the slab menu (use beagle)
Under investigation
Recently used has been replaced with places. We probably need to provide them
both as options.
This would require 2 patches to the gnome-{desktop,panel} packages, for which
i'm in no position to decide if thats something that fedora (core) wishes to do
or not .. i'd prefer that too, but it is a core decision, and not extras.. If
you wish to lobby to the core commity / maintainer of panel/desktop to include
these patches, please do :-)
Help option doesnt work (use yelp)
its already patches to use gnome-yelp.desktop, maybe you don't have it
installed? Its not in the requires yet (WIP), will investigate more tomorrow
Application browser context menu doesnt offer to uninstall (call pirut) or
upgrade (call pup) the application
Whats the pirut call for removing a package? --help gave me no sugestions, nor
is there a man page .. Same with pup .. please advice what command line calls
you'd like to see there
and help is unavailable in the context menu
in all of the application listed in the application browser.
Still under investigation .. i need sleep and have a full time job to you know
:-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 19:09 EST --- suse's patches to gnome panel/desktop can be found in: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ btw, as i memtioned before in comment #13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 19:10 EST --- suse's patches to gnome panel/desktop can be found in: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/slab/patch/ btw, as i memtioned before in comment #12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: slab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 19:27 EST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Recently used has been replaced with places. We probably need to provide
them
both as options.
This would require 2 patches to the gnome-{desktop,panel} packages, for which
i'm in no position to decide if thats something that fedora (core) wishes to
do
or not .. i'd prefer that too, but it is a core decision, and not extras.. If
you wish to lobby to the core commity / maintainer of panel/desktop to include
these patches, please do :-)
It just requires you to file RFE's against the relevant packages preferably with
spec patches and a brief explanation. If its not too intrusive it would probably
be accepted.
Help option doesnt work (use yelp)
its already patches to use gnome-yelp.desktop, maybe you don't have it
installed? Its not in the requires yet (WIP), will investigate more tomorrow
Installing yelp didnt make a difference.
Application browser context menu doesnt offer to uninstall (call pirut) or
upgrade (call pup) the application
Whats the pirut call for removing a package? --help gave me no sugestions, nor
is there a man page .. Same with pup .. please advice what command line calls
you'd like to see there
There is some docs in %docs but not sure whether it is documented or even
possible currently. Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED], jeremy on fedora-devel irc is
the developer and maintainer of both these packages for contact.
and help is unavailable in the context menu
in all of the application listed in the application browser.
Still under investigation .. i need sleep and have a full time job to you
know :-)
I am just a volunteer from the Fedora perspective so take your time. Just
reviewing the functionality.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 19:47 EST --- The Yelp problem was fixed by removing and adding back the applet after installing yelp. Apparently its not dynamic. You can just provide a BR and fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 20:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) It just requires you to file RFE's against the relevant packages preferably with spec patches and a brief explanation. If its not too intrusive it would probably be accepted. This i can gladly do, though looking at the patches they might be called 'intrusive'. The meat of those patches is a new lib (for tracking recently used) but there is also a part which rewrites some of the application launching code, which ofcource is anything but trivial .. if it would ever break, there would be no desktop worth mentioning for the end users :-) For the time being i've replaced the recently used with places, but i'll file the bugs with the RFE's, and see how it floats.. if there accepted i'll build it so that it has both recently used and places (seeing how nautilus has this as a prominent thing too, we might as well include it) Installing yelp didnt make a difference. Glad to hear in comment #27 it did :-) Requires and build requires still need a lot of spit and polish, i'm basing my work on the original spec and it still needs a good scrubbing :-) Yelp and beagle are definatly 2 packages that will make the requires list, however I'm still weighing if i should expand the requires to include openoffice writer/impress/calc, firefox and evolution ... it comes hardcoded with a list of pre-set 'favorite applications' and it would be a shame to have this menu be empty (ie .desktop files not found for those apps).. however it might be a (to) heavy dependency to pull in? There is some docs in %docs but not sure whether it is documented or even possible currently. Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED], jeremy on fedora-devel irc is the developer and maintainer of both these packages for contact. I'll have to ping Jeremy for this, no docs make any mention of such functionality, and where there is a system-install-packages, there's no uninstall .. Alternativly for the time being i considered patching out those menu options if we can't provide them with functionality for now I am just a volunteer from the Fedora perspective so take your time. Just reviewing the functionality. Sorry if i sounded a bit grumpy before, just been a long day :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 20:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) This i can gladly do, though looking at the patches they might be called 'intrusive'. The meat of those patches is a new lib (for tracking recently used) but there is also a part which rewrites some of the application launching code, which ofcource is anything but trivial .. if it would ever break, there would be no desktop worth mentioning for the end users :-) For the time being i've replaced the recently used with places, but i'll file the bugs with the RFE's, and see how it floats.. if there accepted i'll build it so that it has both recently used and places (seeing how nautilus has this as a prominent thing too, we might as well include it) Right. Places seems the best option if you dont manage to get the other patches in which seems unlikely from your comments. I would actually prefer places as a option even if we have a recently used apps feature. Yelp and beagle are definatly 2 packages that will make the requires list, however I'm still weighing if i should expand the requires to include openoffice writer/impress/calc, firefox and evolution ... it comes hardcoded with a list of pre-set 'favorite applications' and it would be a shame to have this menu be empty (ie .desktop files not found for those apps).. however it might be a (to) heavy dependency to pull in? Apparently the favorite applications are treated as bookmarks and assuming the applications in the default desktop group to be present in the system is very reasonable. I would prefer these apps to be not defined as dependencies. Nothing would happen if the user clicks on a non installed application currently which is less of a evil (maybe a quick dialog box that its not installed or offering to install it using pirut might be a option) compared to pulling in the the kitchen sink as dependencies. I'll have to ping Jeremy for this, no docs make any mention of such functionality, and where there is a system-install-packages, there's no uninstall .. Alternativly for the time being i considered patching out those menu options if we can't provide them with functionality for now Ok. That makes sense. I am just a volunteer from the Fedora perspective so take your time. Just reviewing the functionality. Sorry if i sounded a bit grumpy before, just been a long day :-) Thats fine. People assume everyone with a @redhat id has a Fedora job. Just clarifying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-31 20:59 EST --- File the RFE bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200863 Not counting on it floating, but you never know right :-) btw, when apps are not installed (aka their .desktop file is missing from /usr/share/applications/), the menu item is just not showed .. a lot more gracefull way of dealing with it then having dead buttons, so i'll leave that the way it is, and try to make the default 'favorite applications' as sane as possible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 06:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) Rahul, I don't think we have gnomesu command on Fedora systems. When i check Desktop files of main-menu from CVS repository, i found that its calling gnomesu rug update unstable command . Similarly, Ubuntu OS changed that command to gnomesu gnome-app-install. So the problem of not able to use main-menu desktop file is that we don't have gnomesu and i need to know what will be the similar command i can use there instead to use gnomesu? If you see main-menu desktop file's description, you will find Desktop file for SuSE is [Desktop Entry] X-SuSE-translate=true _Name=Software Update Exec=gnomesu rug update unstable Icon=system-software-update Terminal=true Type=Application StartupNotify=true Encoding=UTF-8 NoDisplay=true and Desktop file for Ubuntu is [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Name=No name X-SuSE-translate=true _Name=Software Update Exec=gnomesu gnome-app-install Icon=system-software-update Terminal=true Type=Application StartupNotify=true NoDisplay=true GenericName[en_US]= What should i change in that desktop file for Fedora OS? Wouldn't that be Package Updater (pup)? See /usr/share/applications/pup.desktop from the pirut package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 06:37 EST --- Using consolehelper requires this arrangement: 1. The program to be run as root is installed into /usr/sbin or /sbin, and not /usr/bin, e.g. /usr/sbin/pup 2. A symlink is made from /usr/bin, e.g. /usr/bin/pup - consolehelper So when a regular user types pup, it invokes consolehelper, which prompts for the root password, switches to root and then runs the appropriate program from /usr/sbin or /sbin, i.e. /usr/sbin/pup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 07:06 EST --- What i did is 1)cd /usr/sbin 2)ln -s /usr/bin/consolehelper slab 3)touch /etc/security/console.apps/slab 4)cp /etc/pam.d/halt /etc/pam.d/slab Then i added command /usr/sbin/slab /usr/bin/pup But when i reinstall package and then i click desktop icon under Application-Settings i got new console which even did not ask me for root password and nothing happened. What may go wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 07:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) What i did is 1)cd /usr/sbin 2)ln -s /usr/bin/consolehelper slab This creates a symlink /usr/sbin/slab - /usr/bin/consolehelper This is not the arrangement I described in Comment #6 3)touch /etc/security/console.apps/slab 4)cp /etc/pam.d/halt /etc/pam.d/slab Then i added command /usr/sbin/slab /usr/bin/pup But when i reinstall package and then i click desktop icon under Application-Settings i got new console which even did not ask me for root password and nothing happened. What may go wrong? I am not familiar with slab; what is it *supposed* to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 07:19 EST --- its just substitute to foo given under http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-access-console-enable.html Do i need to use pup instead foo given in above link? I used slab a new file name which is link to consolehelper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 07:24 EST --- The actual program needs to be in /usr/sbin The symlink needs to be in /usr/bin Otherwise, it doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
