Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #50 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-12-22
20:35:15 EDT ---
> Also, the package in comment #30, which seems to be t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #49 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 15:37:10
EDT ---
So what's up with this ticket? The last comment from the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #48 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 14:28:00
EDT ---
rpm may now support noarch subpackages,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #47 from Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-03 12:01:35
EDT ---
Re comment #6 about building a "noar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #46 from Jonathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-22
13:31:26 EDT ---
Actually comment #43 was aimed at t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #45 from Jonathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-22
13:24:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> > Micha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #44 from Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-22 13:20:39
EDT ---
> Michal, you need a emacs-%{name} s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
Jonathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #42 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-20 16:43:53 EDT ---
my bad, i had not installed the cert.
--
Configu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #41 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-20 16:07:53 EDT
---
I can access that page...
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #40 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-20 00:18:51 EDT ---
sorry, i was unable to access the page.
--
Confi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #39 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-19 07:25:30 EDT
---
I you have rpms, I'd like to look at the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #38 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-14 08:55:09 EDT ---
I had tried building a multi-lib package before, a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #37 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-09 11:32:02 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #36)
> > If there i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #36 from Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-09 10:53:18
EDT ---
> If there is %{_host} ...
You mean
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #35 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-09 05:18:23 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Was this an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #34 from Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-09 00:48:20
EDT ---
Files in rep/%{version}/%{_host}/ we
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #33 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-05 15:47:43 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #32)
> > The file /
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #32 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-05 13:03:09 EDT ---
> The file /usr/bin/rep-config will conflict in mu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #31 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-04 12:56:25 EDT
---
* rpmlint output ignorable:
librep-deve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #30 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-04 07:30:14 EDT ---
> I understand why the .la could be needed at runt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #29 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-04 05:58:40 EDT
---
The %{_libdir}/rep/%{version}/ dir seems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #28 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-04 04:16:19 EDT ---
updated package
http://people.redhat.com/rkhadga
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #27 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-04 04:04:59 EDT ---
> Using rep in /usr/share, and in bindir is bad, i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #26 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 20:30:01 EDT ---
here -
http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #25 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 20:20:49 EDT
---
Where is the updated srpm?
--
Configur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #24 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 19:11:58 EDT ---
> Since you use autogen now, I guess that autoconf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #23 from Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 18:59:18
EDT ---
> Regarding the emacs subpackages, m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 18:35:26 EDT
---
The release is not right for svn snapsho
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #21 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 17:59:30 EDT ---
> I notice a bunch of .la files packaged. General
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #20 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-28 16:50:10 EDT
---
Also in librep.pc there is no Libs: entr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #19 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-28 16:35:42 EDT
---
I think it is better to keep changelog,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
Itamar Reis Peixoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #18 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-08 07:20:30 EDT ---
updated. thanks for the inputs.
http://people.red
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 07:25:57 EDT
---
There is an example of emacs subpackages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Comment #16 from ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-13 12:48:45 EDT ---
updated
http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/persona
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remove
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remove
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remove
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remove
57 matches
Mail list logo
