Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-11 Thread MaiMaiPG
Plastic rubbermaid totes will help too.  If you cut a hole toward the  
end on one of the long sides and leave the lid on top, you can stuff  
it with a little hay or pine needles (no cloth please, it holds  
water).  Cutting the hole this way lets them get further out of the  
weather and feels safer than putting it in the middle or on a short  
side.  The top acts as a roof, repelling water and wind and makes it  
easier to tend to the box.  I like to put a little Sevin in for fleas  
during the season.
On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:03 AM, dlg...@windstream.net dlg...@windstream.net 
 wrote:


If the caregivers provide protection for them, even a styrofoam  
cooler wll protect frm rain, snow and with a bit of straw, they can  
be warm.


 GRAS g...@optonline.net wrote:
At least the cat colonies don't have to freeze in the winter in FL  
like they

do elsewhere.

Most TNR groups that I know of in this area don't tests at all.



From: felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org
[mailto:felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] On Behalf Of Heather
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:27 PM
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Subject: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR





-- Forwarded message --
From: Heather furrygi...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org



Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high  
volume TNR

and the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine testing of TNR
ferals...



While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year
nationally, the free roaming cat population on the streets may  
differ vastly
geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of  
thousands of
feral cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on  
the
population at large (or colonies where the feeders are not  
fixing--a huge
sore spot with us, too), meaning trapping pretty much every week,  
sometimes
more than once a week, cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some  
of my
friends trap anywhere from 10 - 50 cats per week for TNR (and of  
course
kittens and such are rescued as much as space/socialization/fosters  
permit,
sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine TNR's--not being rescued for  
adoption or
not being addressed/treated for illness are not tested.   If we  
tested every
cat, we could only spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.   
There
would be far more (exponentially, we all know how cats can  
reproduce--here
it's hot and a mama will have 3 litters a year) cats breeding,  
spreading
illness.  There would be more negative AND more positive cats, and  
therefore
since unfixed, also more positive (and negative) kittens being born  
on the
streets.   In our city, we are serving the greater good by fixing  
as many as
possible.   Since we all also do a lot of rescue, pulling  
friendlies/dumped
cats, or cats to be treated for illness, from colonies, I can say  
we run
into FELV fairly seldomly.  Despite my own very high # of colonies,  
in
addition to helping people rescue and fix cats all over, I have run  
into
FELV the most of anyone I know and it's really just been in two  
areas, close

in proximity, where the feeders are NOT fixing the cats.  Disease
definititely seems to proliferate where the cats are unsterilized,  
though of

course I realize it spreads in other ways besides reproducing.



As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats  
euthanized at our

county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is
interested, the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in  
direct
proportion in terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years  
ago
16K-18K cats were killed per year at this county shelter; now it is  
down to

around 9K.



Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR
clinic, but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded  
with the
ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing  
signs of
illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than  
on
testing.  They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and  
say they
feel a particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the  
decrease

in shelter euthanasia as well.



I have no qualms returning an FIV+ cat to a safe area with a good  
caretaker,
I had one FIV+ female who lived to be 14 outside until we brought  
her in to
live her last 9 months due to geriatric issues.  Granted, this was  
on a
university campus where we often have cats live to be over 10 years  
old
(just a little different environment from the true streets such as  
fast food

joints, etc.).



I hope me providing this perspective isn't resented--again, it's not
intended to argue, just some comments to explain why many embrace  
the ACA

perspective on not testing routine TNR's



Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion and best  
practices for
what they are doing.  The overpopulation problem in Florida is  
insane, that

is one

Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-11 Thread GRAS
A friend also used those wooden garbage bin holders that open from the
frontshe cut openings for entry, put in a shelf for more sleeping space,
filled with hay or straw, or even smaller individual Styrofoam cubicles
without lids, and it housed about 10 or more cats.
BTW - Rubbermaids also make great covered litter boxes for multiple cats.
Cut an appropriate opening in front, depending on cats' needs (low or higher
threshold), and presto, litter box with a lid!  Natalie  

-Original Message-
From: felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org
[mailto:felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] On Behalf Of MaiMaiPG
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 9:11 AM
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

Plastic rubbermaid totes will help too.  If you cut a hole toward the end on
one of the long sides and leave the lid on top, you can stuff it with a
little hay or pine needles (no cloth please, it holds water).  Cutting the
hole this way lets them get further out of the weather and feels safer than
putting it in the middle or on a short side.  The top acts as a roof,
repelling water and wind and makes it easier to tend to the box.  I like to
put a little Sevin in for fleas during the season.
On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:03 AM, dlg...@windstream.net dlg...@windstream.net
 wrote:

 If the caregivers provide protection for them, even a styrofoam cooler 
 wll protect frm rain, snow and with a bit of straw, they can be warm.

  GRAS g...@optonline.net wrote:
 At least the cat colonies don't have to freeze in the winter in FL 
 like they do elsewhere.

 Most TNR groups that I know of in this area don't tests at all.



 From: felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org
 [mailto:felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] On Behalf Of Heather
 Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:27 PM
 To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
 Subject: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR





 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Heather furrygi...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
 To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org



 Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high 
 volume TNR and the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine 
 testing of TNR ferals...



 While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year
 nationally, the free roaming cat population on the streets may  
 differ vastly
 geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of  
 thousands of
 feral cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on  
 the
 population at large (or colonies where the feeders are not  
 fixing--a huge
 sore spot with us, too), meaning trapping pretty much every week,  
 sometimes
 more than once a week, cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some  
 of my
 friends trap anywhere from 10 - 50 cats per week for TNR (and of  
 course
 kittens and such are rescued as much as space/socialization/fosters  
 permit,
 sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine TNR's--not being rescued for  
 adoption or
 not being addressed/treated for illness are not tested.   If we  
 tested every
 cat, we could only spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.   
 There
 would be far more (exponentially, we all know how cats can  
 reproduce--here
 it's hot and a mama will have 3 litters a year) cats breeding,  
 spreading
 illness.  There would be more negative AND more positive cats, and  
 therefore
 since unfixed, also more positive (and negative) kittens being born  
 on the
 streets.   In our city, we are serving the greater good by fixing  
 as many as
 possible.   Since we all also do a lot of rescue, pulling  
 friendlies/dumped
 cats, or cats to be treated for illness, from colonies, I can say  
 we run
 into FELV fairly seldomly.  Despite my own very high # of colonies,  
 in
 addition to helping people rescue and fix cats all over, I have run  
 into
 FELV the most of anyone I know and it's really just been in two  
 areas, close
 in proximity, where the feeders are NOT fixing the cats.  Disease
 definititely seems to proliferate where the cats are unsterilized,  
 though of
 course I realize it spreads in other ways besides reproducing.



 As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats  
 euthanized at our
 county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is
 interested, the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in  
 direct
 proportion in terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years  
 ago
 16K-18K cats were killed per year at this county shelter; now it is  
 down to
 around 9K.



 Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR
 clinic, but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded  
 with the
 ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing  
 signs of
 illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than  
 on
 testing.  They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and  
 say they
 feel a particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the  
 decrease
 in shelter

Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-10 Thread dlgegg
Forgot, good luck and my prayers are with you in Albuquerque.

 Sharyl cline...@yahoo.com wrote: 
 I am looking forward to hearing how this projects goes.  What you have been 
 able to accomplish in Albuquerque is amazing.  This next step will be watched 
 by rescue groups across the country.  
Keep up the good work
Sharyl
 


 From: HIDEYO YAMAMOTO hideyo.yamam...@msn.com
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org 
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd:  TNR
  

 
We here in Albuquerque, just signed a contract with Best Friends to do very 
agressive TNR project and the city is receiving 1 million dollars from Best 
Friends in an effort.
Any healthy cats (tame or feral) who are trapped and brought over to the 
shelters are going to be spayed/neutered and returned to where they come from - 
the idea is to create NO KILL city.
We are already very agressive about TNR effort working with the city, but this 
will allow us to go to the next step.
 
I personally don't believe in testing cats for Felk/FIV - the idea is 
population control by spay/neuter - we simplay put them back where they come 
from.
Also audlts cats are more resistent in getting transmitted the virus evey by 
sharing food/water bowls - this is a finding  from my personal experience -


___
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org


Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-10 Thread dlgegg
If the caregivers provide protection for them, even a styrofoam cooler wll 
protect frm rain, snow and with a bit of straw, they can be warm.

 GRAS g...@optonline.net wrote: 
 At least the cat colonies don't have to freeze in the winter in FL like they
 do elsewhere.
 
 Most TNR groups that I know of in this area don't tests at all.
 
  
 
 From: felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org
 [mailto:felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] On Behalf Of Heather
 Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:27 PM
 To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
 Subject: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR
 
  
 
  
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Heather furrygi...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
 To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
 
 
 
 Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high volume TNR
 and the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine testing of TNR
 ferals...
 
  
 
 While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year
 nationally, the free roaming cat population on the streets may differ vastly
 geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of thousands of
 feral cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on the
 population at large (or colonies where the feeders are not fixing--a huge
 sore spot with us, too), meaning trapping pretty much every week, sometimes
 more than once a week, cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some of my
 friends trap anywhere from 10 - 50 cats per week for TNR (and of course
 kittens and such are rescued as much as space/socialization/fosters permit,
 sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine TNR's--not being rescued for adoption or
 not being addressed/treated for illness are not tested.   If we tested every
 cat, we could only spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.  There
 would be far more (exponentially, we all know how cats can reproduce--here
 it's hot and a mama will have 3 litters a year) cats breeding, spreading
 illness.  There would be more negative AND more positive cats, and therefore
 since unfixed, also more positive (and negative) kittens being born on the
 streets.   In our city, we are serving the greater good by fixing as many as
 possible.   Since we all also do a lot of rescue, pulling friendlies/dumped
 cats, or cats to be treated for illness, from colonies, I can say we run
 into FELV fairly seldomly.  Despite my own very high # of colonies, in
 addition to helping people rescue and fix cats all over, I have run into
 FELV the most of anyone I know and it's really just been in two areas, close
 in proximity, where the feeders are NOT fixing the cats.  Disease
 definititely seems to proliferate where the cats are unsterilized, though of
 course I realize it spreads in other ways besides reproducing. 
 
  
 
 As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats euthanized at our
 county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is
 interested, the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in direct
 proportion in terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years ago
 16K-18K cats were killed per year at this county shelter; now it is down to
 around 9K.
 
  
 
 Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR
 clinic, but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded with the
 ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing signs of
 illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than on
 testing.  They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and say they
 feel a particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the decrease
 in shelter euthanasia as well.
 
  
 
 I have no qualms returning an FIV+ cat to a safe area with a good caretaker,
 I had one FIV+ female who lived to be 14 outside until we brought her in to
 live her last 9 months due to geriatric issues.  Granted, this was on a
 university campus where we often have cats live to be over 10 years old
 (just a little different environment from the true streets such as fast food
 joints, etc.).
 
  
 
 I hope me providing this perspective isn't resented--again, it's not
 intended to argue, just some comments to explain why many embrace the ACA
 perspective on not testing routine TNR's
 
  
 
 Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion and best practices for
 what they are doing.  The overpopulation problem in Florida is insane, that
 is one thing that goes without saying.
 
  
 
 Thanks everyone for caring about cats!
 
  
 
 Heather
 
 On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Beth create_me_...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 I agree, FeLV should be put down or homed. I have returned FIV cats
 
 Unfortunately, Alley Cat Allies thinks they all should be returned  not
 even tested. The place I have gotten ferals fixed believes this  refuses to
 test ferals.
 
 Crazy.
 
  
 


___
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo

[Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-08 Thread Heather
-- Forwarded message --
From: Heather furrygi...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org


Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high volume TNR
and the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine testing of TNR
ferals...

While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year
nationally, the free roaming cat population on the streets may differ
vastly geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of thousands
of feral cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on the
population at large (or colonies where the feeders are not fixing--a huge
sore spot with us, too), meaning trapping pretty much every week, sometimes
more than once a week, cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some of my
friends trap anywhere from 10 - 50 cats per week for TNR (and of course
kittens and such are rescued as much as space/socialization/fosters permit,
sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine TNR's--not being rescued for adoption or
not being addressed/treated for illness are not tested.   If we tested
every cat, we could only spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.
There would be far more (exponentially, we all know how cats can
reproduce--here it's hot and a mama will have 3 litters a year) cats
breeding, spreading illness.  There would be more negative AND more
positive cats, and therefore since unfixed, also more positive (and
negative) kittens being born on the streets.   In our city, we are serving
the greater good by fixing as many as possible.   Since we all also do a
lot of rescue, pulling friendlies/dumped cats, or cats to be treated for
illness, from colonies, I can say we run into FELV fairly seldomly.
Despite my own very high # of colonies, in addition to helping people
rescue and fix cats all over, I have run into FELV the most of anyone I
know and it's really just been in two areas, close in proximity, where the
feeders are NOT fixing the cats.  Disease definititely seems to proliferate
where the cats are unsterilized, though of course I realize it spreads in
other ways besides reproducing.

As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats euthanized at
our county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is
interested, the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in direct
proportion in terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years ago
16K-18K cats were killed per year at this county shelter; now it is down to
around 9K.

Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR
clinic, but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded with the
ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing signs of
illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than on
testing.  They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and say they
feel a particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the decrease
in shelter euthanasia as well.

I have no qualms returning an FIV+ cat to a safe area with a good
caretaker, I had one FIV+ female who lived to be 14 outside until we
brought her in to live her last 9 months due to geriatric issues.  Granted,
this was on a university campus where we often have cats live to be over 10
years old (just a little different environment from the true streets such
as fast food joints, etc.).

I hope me providing this perspective isn't resented--again, it's not
intended to argue, just some comments to explain why many embrace the ACA
perspective on not testing routine TNR's[?]

Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion and best practices for
what they are doing.  The overpopulation problem in Florida is insane, that
is one thing that goes without saying.

Thanks everyone for caring about cats!

Heather

  On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Beth create_me_...@yahoo.com wrote:

  I agree, FeLV should be put down or homed. I have returned FIV cats
 Unfortunately, Alley Cat Allies thinks they all should be returned  not
 even tested. The place I have gotten ferals fixed believes this  refuses
 to test ferals.
 Crazy.


332.gif___
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org


Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-08 Thread GRAS
At least the cat colonies don't have to freeze in the winter in FL like they
do elsewhere.

Most TNR groups that I know of in this area don't tests at all.

 

From: felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org
[mailto:felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] On Behalf Of Heather
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:27 PM
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Subject: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

 

 

-- Forwarded message --
From: Heather furrygi...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org



Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high volume TNR
and the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine testing of TNR
ferals...

 

While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year
nationally, the free roaming cat population on the streets may differ vastly
geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of thousands of
feral cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on the
population at large (or colonies where the feeders are not fixing--a huge
sore spot with us, too), meaning trapping pretty much every week, sometimes
more than once a week, cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some of my
friends trap anywhere from 10 - 50 cats per week for TNR (and of course
kittens and such are rescued as much as space/socialization/fosters permit,
sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine TNR's--not being rescued for adoption or
not being addressed/treated for illness are not tested.   If we tested every
cat, we could only spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.  There
would be far more (exponentially, we all know how cats can reproduce--here
it's hot and a mama will have 3 litters a year) cats breeding, spreading
illness.  There would be more negative AND more positive cats, and therefore
since unfixed, also more positive (and negative) kittens being born on the
streets.   In our city, we are serving the greater good by fixing as many as
possible.   Since we all also do a lot of rescue, pulling friendlies/dumped
cats, or cats to be treated for illness, from colonies, I can say we run
into FELV fairly seldomly.  Despite my own very high # of colonies, in
addition to helping people rescue and fix cats all over, I have run into
FELV the most of anyone I know and it's really just been in two areas, close
in proximity, where the feeders are NOT fixing the cats.  Disease
definititely seems to proliferate where the cats are unsterilized, though of
course I realize it spreads in other ways besides reproducing. 

 

As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats euthanized at our
county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is
interested, the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in direct
proportion in terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years ago
16K-18K cats were killed per year at this county shelter; now it is down to
around 9K.

 

Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR
clinic, but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded with the
ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing signs of
illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than on
testing.  They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and say they
feel a particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the decrease
in shelter euthanasia as well.

 

I have no qualms returning an FIV+ cat to a safe area with a good caretaker,
I had one FIV+ female who lived to be 14 outside until we brought her in to
live her last 9 months due to geriatric issues.  Granted, this was on a
university campus where we often have cats live to be over 10 years old
(just a little different environment from the true streets such as fast food
joints, etc.).

 

I hope me providing this perspective isn't resented--again, it's not
intended to argue, just some comments to explain why many embrace the ACA
perspective on not testing routine TNR's

 

Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion and best practices for
what they are doing.  The overpopulation problem in Florida is insane, that
is one thing that goes without saying.

 

Thanks everyone for caring about cats!

 

Heather

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Beth create_me_...@yahoo.com wrote:

I agree, FeLV should be put down or homed. I have returned FIV cats

Unfortunately, Alley Cat Allies thinks they all should be returned  not
even tested. The place I have gotten ferals fixed believes this  refuses to
test ferals.

Crazy.

 

attachment: image001.gif___
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org


Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-08 Thread Heather
Yeah, it's a catch-22, the elements are much kinder to the cats here...and
thus we have many more cats with year round reproduction...kitten season
never really ends here, though it does slow down considerably and when it
hits--it's like kitten hurricane season.   Worried about this one as we had
an extremely mild winter, shelters are already filling up with kittens and
nursing mamas[?]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:40 PM, GRAS g...@optonline.net wrote:

  At least the cat colonies don’t have to freeze in the winter in FL like
 they do elsewhere…

 Most TNR groups that I know of in this area don’t tests at all.

 ** **

 *From:* felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org [mailto:
 felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather
 *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:27 PM
 *To:* felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
 *Subject:* [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

 ** **

 ** **

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: *Heather* furrygi...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
 To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org

 

 Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high volume
 TNR and the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine testing of TNR
 ferals...

  

 While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year
 nationally, the free roaming cat population on the streets may differ
 vastly geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of thousands
 of feral cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on the
 population at large (or colonies where the feeders are not fixing--a huge
 sore spot with us, too), meaning trapping pretty much every week, sometimes
 more than once a week, cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some of my
 friends trap anywhere from 10 - 50 cats per week for TNR (and of course
 kittens and such are rescued as much as space/socialization/fosters permit,
 sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine TNR's--not being rescued for adoption or
 not being addressed/treated for illness are not tested.   If we tested
 every cat, we could only spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.
 There would be far more (exponentially, we all know how cats can
 reproduce--here it's hot and a mama will have 3 litters a year) cats
 breeding, spreading illness.  There would be more negative AND more
 positive cats, and therefore since unfixed, also more positive (and
 negative) kittens being born on the streets.   In our city, we are serving
 the greater good by fixing as many as possible.   Since we all also do a
 lot of rescue, pulling friendlies/dumped cats, or cats to be treated for
 illness, from colonies, I can say we run into FELV fairly seldomly.
 Despite my own very high # of colonies, in addition to helping people
 rescue and fix cats all over, I have run into FELV the most of anyone I
 know and it's really just been in two areas, close in proximity, where the
 feeders are NOT fixing the cats.  Disease definititely seems to proliferate
 where the cats are unsterilized, though of course I realize it spreads in
 other ways besides reproducing. 

  

 As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats euthanized at
 our county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is
 interested, the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in direct
 proportion in terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years ago
 16K-18K cats were killed per year at this county shelter; now it is down to
 around 9K.

  

 Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR
 clinic, but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded with the
 ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing signs of
 illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than on
 testing.  They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and say they
 feel a particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the decrease
 in shelter euthanasia as well.

  

 I have no qualms returning an FIV+ cat to a safe area with a good
 caretaker, I had one FIV+ female who lived to be 14 outside until we
 brought her in to live her last 9 months due to geriatric issues.  Granted,
 this was on a university campus where we often have cats live to be over 10
 years old (just a little different environment from the true streets such
 as fast food joints, etc.).

  

 I hope me providing this perspective isn't resented--again, it's not
 intended to argue, just some comments to explain why many embrace the ACA
 perspective on not testing routine TNR's

  

 Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion and best practices for
 what they are doing.  The overpopulation problem in Florida is insane, that
 is one thing that goes without saying.

  

 Thanks everyone for caring about cats!

  

 Heather

 On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Beth create_me_...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I agree, FeLV should be put down or homed. I have

Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-08 Thread HIDEYO YAMAMOTO

We here in Albuquerque, just signed a contract with Best Friends to do very 
agressive TNR project and the city is receiving 1 million dollars from Best 
Friends in an effort.
Any healthy cats (tame or feral) who are trapped and brought over to the 
shelters are going to be spayed/neutered and returned to where they come from - 
the idea is to create NO KILL city.
We are already very agressive about TNR effort working with the city, but this 
will allow us to go to the next step.
 
I personally don't believe in testing cats for Felk/FIV - the idea is 
population control by spay/neuter - we simplay put them back where they come 
from.
Also audlts cats are more resistent in getting transmitted the virus evey by 
sharing food/water bowls - this is a finding  from my personal experience -



Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:40:17 -0500
From: g...@optonline.net
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR








At least the cat colonies don’t have to freeze in the winter in FL like they do 
elsewhere…
Most TNR groups that I know of in this area don’t tests at all.
 

From: felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org 
[mailto:felvtalk-boun...@felineleukemia.org] On Behalf Of Heather
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:27 PM
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Subject: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR
 
 

-- Forwarded message --
From: Heather furrygi...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] TNR
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org



Definitely not to argue, but to provide some perspective on high volume TNR and 
the ACA (and Neighborhood Cats) stance on routine testing of TNR ferals...

 

While millions of cats are of course killed in shelters each year nationally, 
the free roaming cat population on the streets may differ vastly 
geographically.  In my city (Tampa), there are hundreds of thousands of feral 
cats.   There are several of us constantly practicing TNR on the population at 
large (or colonies where the feeders are not fixing--a huge sore spot with us, 
too), meaning trapping pretty much every week, sometimes more than once a week, 
cats who are not at our own colonies.  Some of my friends trap anywhere from 10 
- 50 cats per week for TNR (and of course kittens and such are rescued as much 
as space/socialization/fosters permit, sick cats treated, etc.)  Routine 
TNR's--not being rescued for adoption or not being addressed/treated for 
illness are not tested.   If we tested every cat, we could only 
spay/neuter/vaccinate a fraction of the cats.  There would be far more 
(exponentially, we all know how cats can reproduce--here it's hot and a mama 
will have 3 litters a year) cats breeding, spreading illness.  There would be 
more negative AND more positive cats, and therefore since unfixed, also more 
positive (and negative) kittens being born on the streets.   In our city, we 
are serving the greater good by fixing as many as possible.   Since we all also 
do a lot of rescue, pulling friendlies/dumped cats, or cats to be treated for 
illness, from colonies, I can say we run into FELV fairly seldomly.  Despite my 
own very high # of colonies, in addition to helping people rescue and fix cats 
all over, I have run into FELV the most of anyone I know and it's really just 
been in two areas, close in proximity, where the feeders are NOT fixing the 
cats.  Disease definititely seems to proliferate where the cats are 
unsterilized, though of course I realize it spreads in other ways besides 
reproducing. 

 

As TNR has steadily increased in our county, the # of cats euthanized at our 
county AS has steadily declined--I can share a graph if anyone is interested, 
the results are absolutely amazing and pretty much in direct proportion in 
terms of euth decrease/TNR increase.   Several years ago 16K-18K cats were 
killed per year at this county shelter; now it is down to around 9K.

 

Even our own local Humane Society--which has the most awesome s/n/TNR clinic, 
but was very firm on testing for years, finally conceded with the 
ACA/Neighborhood Cats stance that, on routine TNR's not showing signs of 
illness, the resources are best spent in sterilizing more cats than on testing. 
 They do sometimes call us while assessing/operating and say they feel a 
particular cat needs to be tested.  They are elated by the decrease in shelter 
euthanasia as well.

 

I have no qualms returning an FIV+ cat to a safe area with a good caretaker, I 
had one FIV+ female who lived to be 14 outside until we brought her in to live 
her last 9 months due to geriatric issues.  Granted, this was on a university 
campus where we often have cats live to be over 10 years old (just a little 
different environment from the true streets such as fast food joints, etc.).

 

I hope me providing this perspective isn't resented--again, it's not intended 
to argue, just some comments to explain why many embrace the ACA perspective on 
not testing routine TNR's

 

Of course everyone is entitled to their own

Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd: TNR

2012-03-08 Thread Sharyl
I am looking forward to hearing how this projects goes.  What you have been 
able to accomplish in Albuquerque is amazing.  This next step will be watched 
by rescue groups across the country.  
Keep up the good work
Sharyl
 


 From: HIDEYO YAMAMOTO hideyo.yamam...@msn.com
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org 
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] Fwd:  TNR
  

 
We here in Albuquerque, just signed a contract with Best Friends to do very 
agressive TNR project and the city is receiving 1 million dollars from Best 
Friends in an effort.
Any healthy cats (tame or feral) who are trapped and brought over to the 
shelters are going to be spayed/neutered and returned to where they come from - 
the idea is to create NO KILL city.
We are already very agressive about TNR effort working with the city, but this 
will allow us to go to the next step.
 
I personally don't believe in testing cats for Felk/FIV - the idea is 
population control by spay/neuter - we simplay put them back where they come 
from.
Also audlts cats are more resistent in getting transmitted the virus evey by 
sharing food/water bowls - this is a finding  from my personal experience -___
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org