I think that is up to each individual. I personally do not do late term
spays where the kittens have to be euthanized as they take them out, unless
there is some very good reason like the health of the mother. I do early
spays.
On 12/13/06, Tad Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then there
I may be wrong but I will make an educated guess
The shelter in question here is the largest No Kill shelter in the WORLD
The number of animals they rescue is astronomical compared to the shelters
that most of us know of
Yet even at this they are only able to put a very small dent
How can it be No Kill if it kills cats simply for testing positive for
corona? That is not No Kill.
I think the largest actual No Kill shelter is probably Best Friends in Utah,
which has several thousand cats and dogs at a time and does not kill based
on tests.
Michelle
In a message
So then the cat with the positive corona titer is not going to be killed? A
high corona titer does not cause suffering.
Michelle
In a message dated 12/13/2006 11:40:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It does not kill at all unless it is to end the suffering of
And do they except every cat that comes to their door with no medical
records ???
Our local county shelter likes to call themselves almost no kill... But
I have 2 old cat
that were an owner turn in that they refused to take because they were 8
years old
so the owner brought them to my vet to
We have a Humane Society no kill shelter fairly close to me. Their
policy for accepting owner relinquished animals is very strict, only the
most adoptable animals are admitted to the program. Completely
understandable. I heard a very disturbing report from a rescue friend
of mine that some
Kelley Saveika wrote:
My rescue is no kill. That doesn't mean that we accept every animal.
We aren't responsible for the actions of the people whose cats or dogs
we don't take in.
But I bet if you did a follow up on the animals that you don't accept
the end result is death...
This
On 12/13/06, Tad Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelley Saveika wrote:
My rescue is no kill. That doesn't mean that we accept every animal. We
aren't responsible for the actions of the people whose cats or dogs we don't
take in.
But I bet if you did a follow up on the animals that you
At 09:44 AM 12/13/2006, you wrote:
On 12/13/06, Tad Burnett
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly many shelters kill because if RingwormWe are preaching here
to the choir .I don't think it is far fetched to say all of us here
would and do all we can for our animals,
You'd be shocked at the actual definition of no kill in shelter circles.
In most, it simply means that when they run out of space, they stop taking
in new animals, rather than just killing the ones that have been there the
longest. Their testing policy, and euthanasia policy outside of the space
no, i wouldn't. it's a lot like, natural. or, organic. then there are
the ones who won't euthanize even when the animals are clearly suffering,
which to me is as bad as killing healthy positives have you read the
asilomar records, which is what the maddie's fund no-kill nation stuff is
based
Kelly, can I add your website to my list of no kill shelters?
Phaewryn
Please save Whitey! http://ucat.us/Whitey.html
VT low cost SpayNeuter, and Emergency Financial Assistance for cat owners:
http://ucat.us/VermontLowCost.html
Special Needs Cat Resources: http://ucat.us/domesticcatlinks.html
This is a good point. I guess when discussing no kill we should all agree
on a definition - if you don't agree on the definition then you can easily
be discussing two different things, although to me it seems easy enough - no
kill means you don't kill any animals, including those with FIV and/or
sure:)
On 12/13/06, Phaewryn - Controversy Queen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelly, can I add your website to my list of no kill shelters?
Phaewryn
Please save Whitey! http://ucat.us/Whitey.html
VT low cost SpayNeuter, and Emergency Financial Assistance for cat
owners:
hee hee--thought this went to the whole list. since the answer was to
more than just phaewyrn
-- Forwarded message --
From: TenHouseCats [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 13, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: about exposed FIP cat that needs a home/The Big Picture
To: Phaewryn -
And then there is the question of a pregnant mother... Is it OK to
abort the unborn babies ???
TenHouseCats wrote:
no, i wouldn't. it's a lot like, natural. or, organic. then there
are the ones who won't euthanize even when the animals are clearly
suffering, which to me is as bad as killing
16 matches
Mail list logo
