Hi all
@mentors, you all probably received the mail from Google about
community bonding. Please encourange your students to participate
in FFmpeg in some form
@students, google asked us to report any student that shows no activity
by the 16th may. Thus be active and participate in FFmpeg in some
Please ignore.
Problem was in system.
On 04/29/2016 05:56 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/29/2016 05:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 05:08:39PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
This is for the developers:
Building ffmpeg-20160428.tar.bz2
.
.
.
.
yasm -f elf -m amd64 -DPIC -I.
-I"/sdb3
On 4/29/2016 8:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 05:08:39PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>> This is for the developers:
>> Building ffmpeg-20160428.tar.bz2
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> yasm -f elf -m amd64 -DPIC -I.
>> -I"/sdb3/home/jd/rpmbuild/BUILD/ffmpeg-20160428" -Pconfig.asm -I
>>
On 04/29/2016 05:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 05:08:39PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
This is for the developers:
Building ffmpeg-20160428.tar.bz2
.
.
.
.
yasm -f elf -m amd64 -DPIC -I.
-I"/sdb3/home/jd/rpmbuild/BUILD/ffmpeg-20160428" -Pconfig.asm -I
libavcodec/x86/ -o lib
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 05:08:39PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> This is for the developers:
> Building ffmpeg-20160428.tar.bz2
> .
> .
> .
> .
> yasm -f elf -m amd64 -DPIC -I.
> -I"/sdb3/home/jd/rpmbuild/BUILD/ffmpeg-20160428" -Pconfig.asm -I
> libavcodec/x86/ -o libavcodec/x86/vp3dsp.o libavcodec/x86/vp
This is for the developers:
Building ffmpeg-20160428.tar.bz2
.
.
.
.
yasm -f elf -m amd64 -DPIC -I.
-I"/sdb3/home/jd/rpmbuild/BUILD/ffmpeg-20160428" -Pconfig.asm -I
libavcodec/x86/ -o libavcodec/x86/vp3dsp.o libavcodec/x86/vp3dsp.asm
libavcodec/x86/h264_qpel_mmx.c: Assembler messages:
libavcode
On 4/27/16, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 4/18/14, Peter Ross wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ross
>> ---
>> samples: www.acoust.rise.waseda.ac.jp/1bitcons/data.html
>>
>> Changelog| 1 +
>> doc/general.texi | 1 +
>> libavformat/Makefile | 1 +
>> libavformat/allfor
> I found another bug, this time in lossy mode - the file encoded as "joint
> stereo" decodes after a few seconds into noise:
>
> https://www.datafilehost.com/d/c2e8b332
There seems to be infinite loop while decoding fuzzed file:
https://www.datafilehost.com/d/eab97154
Please fix it as well in
Resolves https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4209
---
libavformat/movenc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/movenc.c b/libavformat/movenc.c
index b9c0f7a..c237736 100644
--- a/libavformat/movenc.c
+++ b/libavformat/movenc.c
@@ -3084,6 +3084,7 @@ static int mov_write_udt
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:09:34AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that the only reason that demuxers and decoders
> > are written like that is that we all want FFmpeg to support invalid streams
>
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:11:26 +0300
Александр Слободенюк wrote:
> { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '1') },
> +{ AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '3') },
> { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '5') },
i wonder if we can add m702 + m704 as wel
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:39:34 +0200
Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] avformat/riff: assign g721 and g723 codec tags to
> g726 decoder
> +{ AV_CODEC_ID_ADPCM_G726, 0x0014 },
> +{ AV_CODEC_ID_ADPCM_G726, 0x0040 },
i wonder if we should make a comment that these are diffe
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> I was under the impression that the only reason that demuxers and decoders
> are written like that is that we all want FFmpeg to support invalid streams
> as long as this doesn't affect valid streams.
It's too broad. I want to know
Hi Ronald!
> So, since you're stating this as fact, I would like to point out that this
> was never formally agreed by any group of FFmpeg developers, and this is
> certainly not the official position.
Your message surprises me: The mpegts demuxer (before this discussed patch)
accepts all kind
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Kieran Kunhya obe.tv> writes:
>
> > > It is very important that FFmpeg also decodes invalid
> > > files as long as no valid files are affected.
> >
> > Nonsense,
>
> > should FFmpeg be able to decode any file created by using netcat
On 27.04.2016 16:08, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:10:25PM +0200, Thomas Volkert wrote:
Hi,
,
On 21.03.2016 21:49, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 21.03.16 um 20:42 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Hi,
last weekend
On 4/18/16, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> I think only the 2 first patches are needed, but I prefer the code
> from the 3rd+4th patches. Overall, it's still not the nicest code, and
> valgrind-proofing the patchset is needed (not possible atm for me).
>
> The SSE4 implementation is not worthwhile in
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:46:49 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > The deprecated avcodec_decode_video2() and avcodec_decode_audio4()
> > functions called av_packet_split_side_data() on the input packets. This
> > is required for packets produ
Am 28.04.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> Please review, Carl Eugen
Is there a ticket number?
Matthias
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Hi,
2016-04-27 23:58 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> Mark Thompson jkqxz.net> writes:
>
>> Unless someone can show what created this file and that
>> it might make more, I suggest that the hack workaround
>> should be removed.
>
> Is there a valid file affected by the applied patch?
> It is very i
20 matches
Mail list logo
