Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates

2023-11-10 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel (2023-11-11 08:22:19) > Hi, > > in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list > updates" > vote. > > This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2]. The word 'correlate' does not mean what you seem to think it

[FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates

2023-11-10 Thread Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel
Hi, in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list updates" vote. This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2]. Neither does this list of 51 people [1] correlate to the 54 authorized voters (distinct email addresses) the CIVS system actually counted,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread James Almer
On 11/10/2023 11:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 19:15, Michael

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 19:15, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > On Thu, Nov 09,

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/sbrdsp: R-V V hf_apply_noise functions

2023-11-10 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
This is restricted to 128-bit vectors as larger vector sizes could read past the end of the noise array. Support for future hardware with larger vector sizes is left for some other time. hf_apply_noise_0_c: 2319.7 hf_apply_noise_0_rvv_f32: 1229.0 hf_apply_noise_1_c: 2539.0

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] checkasm: test the noise case of sbrdsp.hf_apply_noise

2023-11-10 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
The tested functions treat s_m[i] == 0 as a special case. Other than that, the functions are slightly complicated vector additions. This actually makes the zero case happen pseudorandomly. --- tests/checkasm/sbrdsp.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Vittorio Giovara
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 2:31 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > [...] or at least allow people to resign from the GA discretionarily. > > I think this makes alot more sense > > Asking "I want to be in the GA" fully in public

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools/ffplay: use SDL_WaitEvent instead of SDL_PeepEvents while paused

2023-11-10 Thread Marton Balint
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Bolshoy Toster wrote: Currently, when ffplay is paused, it still constantly polls for events at the REFRESH_RATE (100 times per second). This leads to a high (5-10% on the latest commit, using SDL2 2.28.5-1) CPU usage, when it should be idle. This commit changes this

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 09:42:19PM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > If we imaginge every citizen in a country would have to publically demand > > in front of the whole citizenship their vote right, explain why they should > > have the right and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Michael Niedermayer wrote: If we imaginge every citizen in a country would have to publically demand in front of the whole citizenship their vote right, explain why they should have the right and then be voted on by all before receiving the right. Nobody said that there

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > [...] or at least allow people to resign from the GA discretionarily. I think this makes alot more sense Asking "I want to be in the GA" fully in public is something thats a very high bar for some people. It certainly is a

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools/ffplay: use SDL_WaitEvent instead of SDL_PeepEvents while paused

2023-11-10 Thread Bolshoy Toster
Currently, when ffplay is paused, it still constantly polls for events at the REFRESH_RATE (100 times per second). This leads to a high (5-10% on the latest commit, using SDL2 2.28.5-1) CPU usage, when it should be idle. This commit changes this behaviour to use SDL_WaitEvent while paused,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] web: add release notes for version 6.1

2023-11-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 6:51 AM Gyan Doshi wrote: > > > On 2023-11-10 11:09 am, Lynne wrote: > > Nov 10, 2023, 05:08 by ffm...@gyani.pro: > > > >> > >> On 2023-11-10 03:23 am, Lynne wrote: > >> > >>> Contents: > >>> > >>> + November 10th, 2023, FFmpeg 6.1 "Heaviside" > >>> + > >>> +FFmpeg

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv2 2/2] sws/rgb2rgb: fix unaligned accesses in R-V V YUYV to I422p

2023-11-10 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
In my personal opinion, we should not need to support unaligned YUY2 pixel maps. They should always be aligned to at least 32 bits, and the current code assumes just 16 bits. However checkasm does test for unaligned input bitmaps. QEMU accepts it, but real hardware dose not. In this particular

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv2 1/2] sws/rgb2rgb: rework R-V V YUY2 to 4:2:2 planar

2023-11-10 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
This saves three scratch registers and three instructions per line. The performance gains are mostly negligible. The main point is to free up registers for further rework. --- libswscale/riscv/rgb2rgb_rvv.S | 25 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] treewide: Spelling fixes

2023-11-10 Thread Diederik de Haas via ffmpeg-devel
Fix spelling issue as reported by Debian's lintian tool: accomodate -> accommodate addtional -> additional auxillary -> auxiliary bellow -> below betweeen -> between Calulate -> Calculate coefficents -> coefficients Defalt -> Default defaul -> default higer -> higher neccesary -> necessary orignal

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Kempf
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, at 14:16, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> First, because noone said anything else on that thread to ask for it to be >> public. > >> And then, because people complained after that it was not public, at the >> following meeting. >> So we said that we would do differently the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 19:15, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > On Thu, Nov

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel
Am 10.11.23 um 13:39 schrieb Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel: The list does not match your list, for example Gautam is on your list but not on joshs So my question is still standing, can you explain how your list was created? or where its from? How was the list of your root admins created? Who

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Reimar Döffinger
Hi! > On 9 Nov 2023, at 13:28, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting James Almer (2023-11-09 13:24:45) >> Hendrik Leppkes and Reimar Döffinger are active, at least. I agree they >> should be in the GA. > > Right, I did not mean to imply ALL the people in the above list are > inactive. But many

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> The list does not match your list, for example Gautam is on your list > but not on joshs > > So my question is still standing, can you explain how your list was created? > or where its from? How was the list of your root admins created? Who decided they would be root? Kieran

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavfilter/dnn/openvino: Reduce redundant memory allocation

2023-11-10 Thread Guo, Yejun
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > wenbin.chen-at-intel@ffmpeg.org > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 4:13 PM > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavfilter/dnn/openvino: Reduce > redundant memory allocation > > From: Wenbin Chen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le 10 novembre 2023 12:54:30 GMT+02:00, Hendrik Leppkes a écrit : >On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:04 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: >> >> Le torstaina 9. marraskuuta 2023, 18.50.52 EET Michael Niedermayer a écrit : >> > that said, i checked ML subscribers and found >> > 16 of the people above to be

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:31:13PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 18:24, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > theres a list of voters in 2020 and 2023 > > The list of voters in 2020 comes from the script written by Josh (IIRC?) and > run by Thilo (?) IIRC when Thilo

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: [...] > You want everything public, for everything, even for list of voters, and > emails, and SPI reimbursements, (for things that are something a clear > privacy and GDPR violations). But now, you want to keep private the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:24 PM James Almer wrote: > > On 11/9/2023 9:21 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-11-09 12:55:25) > >> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:44:12AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > >>> As nobody expressed a preference, the vote will start next Monday > >>>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:04 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > Le torstaina 9. marraskuuta 2023, 18.50.52 EET Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > that said, i checked ML subscribers and found > > 16 of the people above to be currently subscribed with email addresses > > that i found by greping their

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA

2023-11-10 Thread Tobias Rapp
On 09/11/2023 12:55, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:44:12AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: As nobody expressed a preference, the vote will start next Monday (2023-11-13). It should run for a week, and will be followed by TC/CC elections. The only extra GA candidate I see