I admit to being a serial rebaser and force-pusher to pull-requests. :P
Anyway, I can't run FATE on that setup, because although the ffmpeg libs compile
the ffmpeg command line tool doesn't compile.
The old "stdin->_cnt" hack no longer works since "FILE" in the new C runtime
is just a struct with
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:30:21PM +0100, Peter wrote:
> I originally send a patch without the libavutil/internal.h changes (with a
> wrong email address so I thought it didn't show up) but without them linking
> fails since it will then search avpriv_strtod and avpriv_snprintf but it will
> find n
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:40 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 06/03/15 6:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:06:23PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 06/03/15 6:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
On 06/03/15 6:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:06:23PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 06/03/15 6:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:23:43PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:06:23PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 06/03/15 6:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -050
I originally send a patch without the libavutil/internal.h changes (with a
wrong email address so I thought it didn't show up) but without them linking
fails since it will then search avpriv_strtod and avpriv_snprintf but it will
find neither.
So, yeah the changed line in libavutil/internal.h is a
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:06:23PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 06/03/15 6:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:06:23PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 06/03/15 6:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 22:06:25 +0100
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:00 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:59:43 -0500
> > "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
> >>
> >> > From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f
On 06/03/15 6:06 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:00 PM, wm4 wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:59:43 -0500
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
>>>
From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:00 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:59:43 -0500
> "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
>>
>> > From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Peter Tissen
>> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 20
On 06/03/15 6:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
>>>
From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:58:37PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
> >
> > > From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Peter
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:59:43 -0500
"Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> > From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Peter Tissen
> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Make compilable
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:59:43PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> > From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Peter Tissen
> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Make compila
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Peter wrote:
> From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Peter Tissen
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Make compilable with VS2015
>
> So Visual Studio 2015 has some breaking changes regarding the
>From c72344d2b1dc8b087e5da904724c959005f36f4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Tissen
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:39:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Make compilable with VS2015
So Visual Studio 2015 has some breaking changes regarding the C
runtime. In short, they made C99 compatable runtime.
Refer t
17 matches
Mail list logo