On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:07:26PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/7/2016 6:14 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> libavformat/utils.c |4 +++-
> >> > tests/ref/fate/copy-trac4914 |4 ++--
> >> > tests/ref/fate/copy-trac4914-avi |4 ++--
> >> > 3 files changed, 7 inse
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:07:26PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/7/2016 6:14 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> libavformat/utils.c |4 +++-
> >> > tests/ref/fate/copy-trac4914 |4 ++--
> >> > tests/ref/fate/copy-trac4914-avi |4 ++--
> >> > 3 files changed, 7 inse
On 9/7/2016 6:14 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> libavformat/utils.c |4 +++-
>> > tests/ref/fate/copy-trac4914 |4 ++--
>> > tests/ref/fate/copy-trac4914-avi |4 ++--
>> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> > 2dc146e807cbdbdbca653a22d827920e8c05b3c8
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:26:59PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:45:46PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 20
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:45:46PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:18:35PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:32:24AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/6/2016 9:57 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> >> We don't have time_base in codecpar, so why do we need ticks per frame in
> >> it?
> >> >
> >> > Which time_base does it modify the interpretation of? The field should
> >> > be bundled w
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:18:35PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:57:06AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 05,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:32:24AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/6/2016 9:57 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> >> We don't have time_base in codecpar, so why do we need ticks per frame in
> >> it?
> >> >
> >> > Which time_base does it modify the interpretation of? The field should
> >> > be bundled w
On 9/6/2016 9:57 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> We don't have time_base in codecpar, so why do we need ticks per frame in it?
>> >
>> > Which time_base does it modify the interpretation of? The field should
>> > be bundled with that, then.
> When do we have a mismatch of st->time_base and that "codec
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:18:35PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:57:06AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 05,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:18:35PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:57:06AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:04:35PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> > > On 9/5/2016 12:41 PM, M
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:18:35PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:57:06AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:04:35PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 9/5/2016 12:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:5
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:57:06AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:04:35PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 9/5/2016 12:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > >> From: Clément Bœsch
> > >>
> > >> The
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:04:35PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/5/2016 12:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> >> From: Clément Bœsch
> >>
> >> These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymore and prevent
> >> the co
On 9/5/2016 10:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/5/2016 12:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>>> From: Clément Bœsch
>>>
>>> These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymore and prevent
>>> the convert of ffmpeg*.c to cod
On 9/5/2016 12:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> From: Clément Bœsch
>>
>> These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymore and prevent
>> the convert of ffmpeg*.c to codecpar.
>
> ./ffmpeg -i ~/tickets/4914/xdcam8m
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:49:10PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:41:25PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > > From: Clément Bœsch
> > >
> > > These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymo
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:41:25PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > From: Clément Bœsch
> >
> > These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymore and prevent
> > the convert of ffmpeg*.c to codecpar.
>
> ./ffmpeg
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> From: Clément Bœsch
>
> These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymore and prevent
> the convert of ffmpeg*.c to codecpar.
./ffmpeg -i ~/tickets/4914/xdcam8mp2-1s_small.ts -c:v copy out.mxf
fails, no output anymore
From: Clément Bœsch
These adjusted codec fields do not seem to be in use anymore and prevent
the convert of ffmpeg*.c to codecpar.
---
ffmpeg.c | 42 --
1 file changed, 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ffmpeg.c b/ffmpeg.c
index d858407..9516b2d 100644
--- a/f
21 matches
Mail list logo