On 4/13/2019 10:46 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2019-04-13 15:28 GMT+02:00, James Almer :
>
>> It would be nice to know what the reference decoder does
>
> That's why I told you;-)
I must have missed it. Outside of saying its output is bitexact for the
first sample as ffmpeg after my patch, i d
2019-04-13 15:28 GMT+02:00, James Almer :
> It would be nice to know what the reference decoder does
That's why I told you;-)
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscr
On 4/13/2019 10:28 AM, James Almer wrote:
> On 4/13/2019 5:44 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2019-04-10 21:47 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>>> 2019-04-09 20:32 GMT+02:00, James Almer :
Fixes ticket #7174.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
This makes what's essentially a non
On 4/13/2019 5:44 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2019-04-10 21:47 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> 2019-04-09 20:32 GMT+02:00, James Almer :
>>> Fixes ticket #7174.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>>> ---
>>> This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant
>>> stream decodable again with no v
2019-04-10 21:47 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2019-04-09 20:32 GMT+02:00, James Almer :
>> Fixes ticket #7174.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant
>> stream decodable again with no visual artifacts, and
>> without reintroducing the risk
2019-04-09 20:32 GMT+02:00, James Almer :
> Fixes ticket #7174.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant
> stream decodable again with no visual artifacts, and
> without reintroducing the risk of overflows.
Your patch leads to bit-exact output with
On 4/10/2019 5:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:32:26PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> Fixes ticket #7174.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant stream decodable again
>> with
>> no visual artifacts, and without r
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:32:26PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> Fixes ticket #7174.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant stream decodable again with
> no visual artifacts, and without reintroducing the risk of overflows.
>
> Alternatively, we
Fixes ticket #7174.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
This makes what's essentially a non spec compliant stream decodable again with
no visual artifacts, and without reintroducing the risk of overflows.
Alternatively, we could clip the luma and chroma values to the -128..127
range instead of settin
