Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
James Almer gmail.com> writes: > Why does configure even check for 2.x if the actual > lavc wrappers don't currently support it? It is possible to use openjpeg2 with current FFmpeg (I use it for testing) but it is everything but user-friendly. Carl Eugen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Michael Bradshaw gmail.com> writes: > tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. > Currently, I've opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I > proceed with preparing this patch for submission, or > should I alter it to keep 1.5 support? Do distributions support (contain) 2.x? Carl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:03:43AM -0700, Michael Bradshaw wrote: > tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. Currently, I've > opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I proceed with preparing this patch for > submission, or should I alter it to keep 1.5 support? > > > > The

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Nicolas George
Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : > Definitely not. Even Arch Linux, generally an early adopter, does not > use openjpeg2, but instead openjpeg for most things. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/openjpeg2/ Are you sure of your statement? Regards, --

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 24.10.2015 18:59, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Michael Bradshaw gmail.com> writes: > >> tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. >> Currently, I've opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I >> proceed with preparing this patch for submission, or >> should I alter it to keep 1.5

[FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Michael Bradshaw
tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. Currently, I've opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I proceed with preparing this patch for submission, or should I alter it to keep 1.5 support? The OpenJPEG API went through a bit of an overhaul in the 1.x to 2.x transition. This

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Michael Bradshaw gmail.com> writes: > >> tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. >> Currently, I've opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I >> proceed with preparing this patch for submission, or >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : >> Definitely not. Even Arch Linux, generally an early adopter, does not >> use openjpeg2, but instead openjpeg for most things. > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Nicolas George
Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : > I did not say it is not present, just that more packages rely on > openjpeg instead of openjpeg2. Ok. But having it available is enough, we do not really care how many other programs use it, only that Michael, the maintainer for this

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread James Almer
On 10/24/2015 1:03 PM, Michael Bradshaw wrote: > tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. Currently, I've > opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I proceed with preparing this patch for > submission, or should I alter it to keep 1.5 support? > > > > The OpenJPEG API went

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Nicolas George
Le tridi 3 brumaire, an CCXXIV, James Almer a écrit : > No idea about other distros, but in any case, if there's any that doesn't > ship it then we should keep supporting it for a while, even if it means > adding some ugly macros. Depending on the ugliness of the macros, maybe duplicating the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Michael Bradshaw
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Timothy Gu wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM James Almer wrote: > > > Gentoo and Debian both seem to ship it. Arch does as well but on their > > Community repository (ffmpeg adopting it may be incentive enough

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sat, 24 Oct, 2015 at 21:37:57 GMT, Michael Bradshaw wrote: > Crap, you're right. Before I started this I checked if Ubuntu had openjpeg2 > and they do[1] but it turns out it's really just openjpeg 1.3 (if anyone > knows why they made a separate package named libopenjpeg2 when it's really >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 18:59, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Michael Bradshaw gmail.com> writes: > > > tl;dr: I've got a patch that updates OpenJPEG to 2.0/2.1. > > Currently, I've opted to drop OpenJPEG 1.5. Should I > > proceed with preparing this patch for submission, or > > should I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Can we drop OpenJPEG 1.5 in favor of 2.x?

2015-10-24 Thread Michael Bradshaw
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > James Almer gmail.com> writes: > > > Why does configure even check for 2.x if the actual > > lavc wrappers don't currently support it? > > It is possible to use openjpeg2 with current > FFmpeg (I use it for testing)