On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 09:23:35PM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> lör 2023-09-09 klockan 15:53 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 09:04:25AM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > > fre 2023-09-08 klockan 15:09 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > AI based
lör 2023-09-09 klockan 15:53 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 09:04:25AM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > fre 2023-09-08 klockan 15:09 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> [...]
>
> > > AI based filters are neglegted at a time everything is shifting
> > > to neural networks
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 11:22 AM Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 9:10 AM Michael Niedermayer >
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:42:17PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Propose a talk, from 5min to 30min.
> >
> > As i will not be at the
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 03:09:49PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:42:17PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> [...]
> > Propose a talk, from 5min to 30min.
[...]
> Clientside / "in browser" also has become very important but
> is absent from our documentation, our
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 06:42:49PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le perjantaina 8. syyskuuta 2023, 16.09.49 EEST Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
[...]
> > Should decissions in FFmpeg be made to maximize benefit / be optimal for
> > FFmpeg ?
>
> How do you define benefit for FFmpeg? This is
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 03:53:59PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 9/8/2023 2:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Whats the scope of FFmpeg ?
> > And is this direction that is taken optimal for FFmpeg, and what people
> > want ?
>
> Not that I don't think this is an issue worth discussing
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 09:04:25AM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> fre 2023-09-08 klockan 15:09 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
[...]
> > AI based filters are neglegted at a time everything is shifting
> > to neural networks and AI.
>
> Good. AI is a meme. Polynomial regression is just as good.
fre 2023-09-08 klockan 15:09 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> the video encoder core we had, which encoded from mpeg1 to mpeg4,
> msmpeg*, rv* and others
> and at the time was the best encoder available (not anymore now, no)
> but after mpeg4-asp,
> modern video encoders where no longer added to
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 12:19:45PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/8/2023 10:09 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > There has been a marked shift of project goals over the years. While long
> > ago FFmpeg
> > was "all of multimedia". With time the scope of the project has shrunk.
> > FFserver was
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 18:39, Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 8, 2023, at 6:09 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > modern video encoders where no longer added to ffmpeg
>
> Writing a good modern video encoder is a massive undertaking, and i
> On Sep 8, 2023, at 6:09 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> modern video encoders where no longer added to ffmpeg
Writing a good modern video encoder is a massive undertaking, and i think it's
likely that encoders are going to be mostly integrated via libraries.
Along those lines
Le perjantaina 8. syyskuuta 2023, 16.09.49 EEST Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> In the past, most developers in FFmpeg where primarly FFmpeg developers. But
> as FFmpeg is used by almost everyone now, that has changed and many
> developers in FFmpeg today are primarly developer of 3rd party
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 9:10 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:42:17PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> [...]
> > Propose a talk, from 5min to 30min.
>
> As i will not be at the conference, here are some quick words
>
I really think you should reconsider this
On 9/8/2023 10:09 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
There has been a marked shift of project goals over the years. While long ago
FFmpeg
was "all of multimedia". With time the scope of the project has shrunk.
FFserver was removed not improved, not replaced.
the video encoder core we had, which
On 9/8/2023 2:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Whats the scope of FFmpeg ?
> And is this direction that is taken optimal for FFmpeg, and what people want ?
Not that I don't think this is an issue worth discussing (it is), but I thought
it
was important to note that most/many of the people who
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:42:17PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
[...]
> Propose a talk, from 5min to 30min.
As i will not be at the conference, here are some quick words
In the past, most developers in FFmpeg where primarly FFmpeg developers. But as
FFmpeg is
used by almost everyone now,
On Sun, 20 Aug 2023, at 15:01, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> Will it be possible to attend via Jitsi Meet or similar?
For the FFmpeg meeting, of course. For the rest, I dunno yet.
jb
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel
Will it be possible to attend via Jitsi Meet or similar?
/Tomas
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with
Hello FFfolks,
I'm glad to invite you to VDD 2023 in Dublin, at the end of next month.
I wish I could have invited you to Iceland, but it proved too difficult to
organize over there. I'll do better next year, I promise :)
What is it?
---
The format of the conference is going to be
19 matches
Mail list logo
