On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 1:23 PM Timo Rothenpieler
wrote:
> On 09/09/2024 12:02, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Rémi Denis-Courmont (2024-09-09 09:32:07)
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Le 8 septembre 2024 19:57:38 GMT+03:00, Timo Rothenpieler <
> t...@rothenpieler.org> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Well, the reality
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:40 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-07-17):
> > He is not. Stop spreading propaganda or further emails will be forwarded
> to
> > CC for disciplinary action.
>
> Can you quote the article of the code of conduct that you
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:22 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Anton Khirnov (12024-07-17):
> > What do you think gives you the right to make such decisions on your
> > own?
>
> Despite what some people might think, including on occasion himself,
> Michael is still our project leader, appointed by our f
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 2:25 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 9:55 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 1
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:06 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:18PM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 9:45 AM Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel <
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > &g
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 9:45 AM Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FFmpeg will have a booth at the next IBC from September 13th to 16th
> 2024 in Amsterdam [1]!
>
> We received a corporate sponsorship for the booth, so there are no costs
> for the FFmpeg pr
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 9:55 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 02:50, Kacper Michajlow
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 00:45, Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:44 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> on "INT is 64bit" systems they may have been false
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> ---
> libavutil/imgutils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavutil/imgutils.c b/libavutil/imgutils.c
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:50 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Fixes: CID1559901 Resource leak
>
> Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_tiltandshift.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavfilter/
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 9:29 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-07-02 10:45 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
> > ---
> > doc/filters.texi | 8
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
> > index 0ff7c142b6..c9c4f7cf6b 100644
> > -
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:00 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 10:19:31PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 08:50:24PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> > > On 01.07.2024 15:39, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > coverity se
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 1:47 PM Niklas Haas wrote:
>
> Open questions:
>
> 1. Is this a good idea, or do the downsides outweigh the benefits?
> 2. Is an "advanced configuration" API still needed, in addition to the
>quality presets?
>
Having a sort of preset is a good idea, esp to simplify t
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 1:16 AM James Almer wrote:
> Given that a video stream/frame may have only one or both views coded with
> the packing information being unavailable, this commit adds a new type
> value
> AV_STEREO3D_UNSPEC for this purpose.
>
not to bikeshed the name, but why UNSPEC inste
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 7:57 PM James Almer wrote:
> On 6/22/2024 7:19 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > Needless to say I support the plan of renaming the library so that it can
> > be inline with the other libraries names, and the use of a separate
> header
> > since down
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 9:57 PM James Almer wrote:
> On 6/22/2024 12:31 PM, James Almer wrote:
> > We need a way to signal the frame has a single view that doesn't map to
> any
> > particular eye, and it should be the default one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Almer
> > ---
> > Now updating all t
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 3:22 PM Niklas Haas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> As some of you know, I got contracted (by STF 2024) to work on improving
> swscale, over the course of the next couple of months. I want to share my
> current plans and gather feedback + measure sentiment.
>
> ## Problem statement
>
>
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 7:09 PM James Almer wrote:
> diff --git a/libavformat/nal.h b/libavformat/nal.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..ce49ea70b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libavformat/nal.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +/*
> + * NAL helper functions for muxers
> + *
> + * This file is part of F
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 9:01 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12024-06-17):
> > also if you look at google trends, even today more people search for
> ffserver
> > than txproto. In fact at every point in time more people searched for
> ffserver
> > than txproto.
> >
> > https://tre
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:34 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 07:42:53PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:32:27PM +0200, Lynne wrote:
> > > Apr 22, 2024, 13:07 by stefa...@gmail.com:
> > >
> > > > On date Sunday 2024-04-21 22:12:56 -0300, Jam
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 6:32 PM Sean McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024, 10:15 Vittorio Giovara
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:49 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> > mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 202
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:49 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:26:37PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 11 juin 2024 12:59:23 GMT+03:00, Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc> a écrit :
> > >On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:52:08PM -0400, Sean McGovern
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 2:41 PM Timo Rothenpieler
wrote:
> > In either case, my point is that email is not a good system for these
> > reports, because they cannot be tracked nor analyzed, and if they do
> pose a
> > security risk they shouldn't be advertised so openly. Having a small
> bounty
>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 2:29 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 04:08:48PM -0400, Sean McGovern wrote:
> [...]
> > Side note: it seems GMail now prevents sending patches directly with
> > git send-email
>
> I have difficulty believing this, but if so, the problem is gmail
> a
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 12:04 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 03:10:09PM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 12:50 AM Timo Rothenpieler >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 08.06.2024 21:49, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 9:58 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara:
> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 9:45 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> > andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Andreas Rheinhard
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 12:50 AM Timo Rothenpieler
wrote:
> On 08.06.2024 21:49, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 6:02 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 01:38:16AM +0200,
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 9:45 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Andreas Rheinhardt:
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
> > ---
> > libavcodec/dnxhdenc.c | 33 +
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --gi
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 6:02 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 01:38:16AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > To keep people updated (and as this is not vissible on the ML)
> > heres my current list of issues marked as false positives / intentional
> in Mai &
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 3:19 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> ---
> libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.c b/libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.c
> index 5fc55d5de9..88f2bcecad 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.c
> +++ b/lib
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:07 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 12:31:28PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 5 juin 2024 12:18:57 GMT+03:00, "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <
> r...@remlab.net> a écrit :
> > >But by reacting *only* to Vittorio trying to defend himself and
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:21 AM Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>
> >> If you stop responding with mails on all FFmpeg mailing lists from now
> to
> >> indefinite time in future nothing of value would be lost.
> >>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 11:22 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > Sure I'm happy to work on this with you! Let's talk offline about it
>
> Why should discussions about a FFmpeg booth be offline ?
>
That's a great question, CC-ing Thilo about it.
--
Vittorio
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:47 PM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 2024, at 11:53 PM, Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via ffm
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:39 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:53 PM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:59 PM Vittorio Gio
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:59 PM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:09 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Vittorio Gio
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:09 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:55 AM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:53 AM Vittorio Gio
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:16 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > Breakages are expected when you remove API.
>
> Are Breakages also expected when you do not remove API ?
>
If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a
sound?
--
Vittorio
___
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:55 AM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:53 AM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > Reposting my question/comment here since Thilo hasn't had a chance to
> > respond, but shouldn't these kinds of requests go through the GA? If
> > anybody can do whatever they want with the ffmpe
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 10:57 PM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 2024, at 12:26 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont
> wrote:
> >
> > Le maanantaina 3. kesäkuuta 2024, 21.58.48 EEST Cosmin Stejerean via
> ffmpeg-
> > devel a écrit :
> >> Not sure why you ke
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 8:50 AM Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> Am 02.06.24 um 22:14 schrieb Tomas Härdin:
> > sön 2024-06-02 klockan 20:01 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 05:19:26PM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> >>
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:49 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> ---
> libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.h | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.h b/libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.h
> index 8208268460..33ad4ac0aa 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/hevc/hevcdec.h
> +++ b/libavcodec/hevc/
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:50 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Before this is forgotten again, better start some dicsussion too early
> than too late
>
> I propose that if we have the oppertunity again next year to receive a
> grant
> from STF. That we use it to fund:
>
> * Paul to work
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:35 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > - secure funding for larger projects
>
> what project you want to get funding for ?
> A wide range of things are funded, and last i asked when STF money was
> available
> i couldnt even find enough people willing to submit a project to
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 3:09 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 02:04:16PM -0400, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 9:06 AM Ondřej Fiala wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat May 4, 2024 at 3:11 AM CEST, flow gg wrote:
> > > > I have
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 9:06 AM Ondřej Fiala wrote:
> On Sat May 4, 2024 at 3:11 AM CEST, flow gg wrote:
> > I have tried git-send-email, but it failed. You can say that I am stupid,
> > but I would say that this is because of various reasons such as my area
> and
> > the network. It is really not
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:35 AM Ondřej Fiala wrote:
> On Thu May 2, 2024 at 4:20 PM CEST, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > > [...]
> > I feel it's a huge selection bias to have arguments about Gitlab vs
> Mailing
> > list handled on a mailing list.
> >
> > [...]
> You will get similar selection bias anyw
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 6:24 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:15:27AM -0700, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:00 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Microsoft expande
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:00 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > Microsoft expanded into new fields with Xbox and Azure, yes. But Windows
> is still an OS, and Office is still a (un)productivity suite.
> >
> > Accordingly, maybe you can innovate with a new project within the same
> legal entity as
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:55 AM Andrew Sayers
wrote:
> The hypothetical me wants not to throw away a week's work
> because he did everything through AVOptions then came across some edge case
> that doesn't fit into the AVOptions model.
Out of curiosity, what are those edge cases?
--
Vittorio
_
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 2:06 PM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM Diederick C. Niehorster <
> > dcni...@gmail.com>
> &g
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM Diederick C. Niehorster
wrote:
> If i recall correctly, there was a conversation not too long ago about what
> to do with all the SPI money. This seems to be a perfect use for it.
> 1. Set up and manage a gitlab instance
> 2. Move tickets from trac to there (possi
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 6:02 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12024-04-11):
> > Maybe its just me but i find it desireable to be able to just
> > pull ffmpeg master head, build it and have it work on as many systems
> > as possible.
>
> While the last time FFmpeg added features… is
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:19 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:57:02PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > [Apologies for continuing the conversation, Rémi]
> >
> > Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 14:05, Tomas Härdin a écrit :
> >
> > > mån 2024-04-08 klockan 13:13 -0500 skrev
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:14 PM Romain Beauxis
wrote:
> I would like to offer a constructive feedback really not intended as
> trolling. I believe that supporting a more modern development workflow such
> as the GitHub PR or gitlab MR would go very long way in helping onboarding
> new developers.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, at 23:18, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > As attached.
>
> Updated version attached (v2).
>
lgtm with AV1 capitalized
--
Vittorio
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel
Dijkstra time!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:22 AM wrote:
> My choice would be Dijkstra as well.
>
> On 2 Apr 2024, at 7:45, AV Preservation by reto.ch (lists) wrote:
>
> > Sean McGovern wrote:
> >
> >> Not sure if I am allowed to pick, my choice is Dijkstra.
> >
> > When I started programming in 19
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:55 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:38 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> > andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhard
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:38 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
> ---
> libavutil/avstring.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavutil/avstring.c b/libavutil/avstring.c
> index 2071dd36a5..8
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:04 PM Niklas Haas wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:59:53 + Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 19, 2024, at 2:39 PM, Derek Buitenhuis <
> derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The reason I never implement
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:20 PM Marth64 wrote:
> I have not interacted with this user and I am just a mediocre contributor.
> But from my experience running forums and IRC networks in the past,
> this always ends in one process...
>
>1. toxic user comes along
>2. upsets people repeatedly,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 6:01 PM Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 16:50, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > Kieran Kunhya (12024-03-08):
> > > New contributors are not interested in your biased history lessons.
> They
> > > want to write code and have a modern, well run project, not a
> > dys
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:34 PM Sean McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 10:31 Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:21 PM Vittorio Giovara <
> > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Sean M
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Sean McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 08:20 Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > Andreas Rheinhardt (12024-03-08):
> > > What maintenance cost and complexity are you referring to? I checked
> and
> > > could not find a single commit where one had to fix an ff_get_buff
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:18 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> -1: This adds avoidable runtime checks.
> >
> > What checks and why is that a problem?
> >
> It adds a runtime check to every call to ff_get_buffer() by every
> decod
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 12:25 AM Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > instead of backroom deals, for a
> > change.
>
> iam sorry, but these accusations are not acceptable
> The application was and is on a public wiki
> the SoWs where collected by pierre and it
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 3:50 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:45:02AM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:57 AM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 a
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:57 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 03:49:33AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> [...]
>
> > +If a TC member is aware of a conflict of interest with regards to the
> case, they must announce it
> > +and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:46 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > Again, the effective way to work-around this problem is to keep a large
> and
> > diverse enough TC membership to offset the one or few hypothetical
> dishonest
> > votes.
>
> This doesnt work. The set of people is very specific, and t
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:34 PM Lynne wrote:
> >> If it's the last case, or simply being a one-off, I can agree with
> deprecating
> >> and remove it next bump. But if the developer thinks they will have
> time and
> >> have motivation to work on it in the future, I think we should leave it
> at
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 2:31 PM Lynne wrote:
> Feb 29, 2024, 02:50 by vittorio.giov...@gmail.com:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:13 PM Lynne wrote:
> >
> >> Feb 28, 2024, 14:29 by mich...@niedermayer.cc:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0100, J. Dekker wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> This
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:13 PM Lynne wrote:
> Feb 28, 2024, 14:29 by mich...@niedermayer.cc:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0100, J. Dekker wrote:
> >
> >> This was an experimental/research codec of which ffmpeg is the only
> >> encoder and decoder,
> >>
> >
> >
> >> development has
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 1:56 PM J. Dekker wrote:
> Inactive since 2007.
>
> Signed-off-by: J. Dekker
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
lgtm
--
Vittorio
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmp
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:38 PM J. Dekker wrote:
>
> Michael Niedermayer writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0100, J. Dekker wrote:
> >> This was an experimental/research codec of which ffmpeg is the only
> >> encoder and decoder,
> >
> >
> >> deve
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 3:50 PM wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Feb 2024, at 15:38, Niklas Haas wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:43:30 +0200 Jan Ekström wrote:
> >> Do note that the idea was that this would only be for management of
> >> the main archive, so it would not affect clients/runners rsync'ing
>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:40 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-19 08:00 pm, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:11 AM Gyan Doshi wrote:
> >
> >> The TC is invoked when there's an intractable dispute. So the dispute
> >> prece
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:28 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-02-19):
> > By that reasoning, someone could argue that you forced the inclusion of
> > this rule being discussed only to set up a backdoor in the process and
> > thwart any chance of a functi
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:30 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-02-19):
> > I understand your concerns regarding the potential consequences of
> changing
> > this rule, and I acknowledge the importance of upholding the principles
> > that underpin
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:11 AM Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-19 03:16 am, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:02 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 2024-02-18 11:33 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >>> Quoting Gyan Dos
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 9:54 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-02-18):
> > While I understand that you're referencing the existing rules that we've
> > collectively agreed upon, I believe it's crucial for us to periodically
> > review and refi
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 9:45 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-02-18):
> > If it helps, I'll block the patch so that Anton can vote in the TC.
> > Do you see how slippery (and insane) this interpretation of the rule
> > becomes?
>
> The rules ar
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:17 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 11:48:59PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 11:34 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > * A disagreement implies that there are 2 parties
> > > * And we assume here that what one
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 11:34 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 07:20:43PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-18 01:43:14)
> > > "If the disagreement involves a member of the TC"
> > > does IMHO not preclude commenting on a patch.
> >
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:25 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-02-18):
> > While I value your insights, I'd like to offer a different
> > viewpoint regarding the practice of recusing oneself from discussions.
>
>
>
> That might be your
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:02 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-18 11:33 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-18 05:06:30)
> >> b) what "maximalist" interpretation?
> > A non-maximalist interpretation would be that a TC member is only
> > excluded from voting when they auth
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 7:40 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Anton Khirnov (12024-02-18):
> > That is absurd and makes no sense.
>
> That makes absolute sense, unless you consider your opinion is worth
> more than the opinion of the other people in the project.
>
> A spot on the TC is no
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 4:02 PM Jerome Martinez
wrote:
> In other words, I would like to know if AVFrame is intended at long term
> to handle also fields in addition to frames, and if so is there a way to
> signal that the AVFrame structure actually contains a field
>
I may be missing something
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 6:38 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Anton Khirnov (12024-02-07):
> > ...so they are precisely broken by design.
>
> Words words words.
>
> Words to try and hide that something used to work for people and now you
> are done with it it no longer works.
>
> Exactly the kind of att
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:11 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le torstaina 1. helmikuuta 2024, 19.45.52 EET Vittorio Giovara a écrit :
> > The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be
> > either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up th
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:18 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:06 PM Michael Niedermayer >
> wrote:
>
> > 2. Deliverables
> > Patches submitted for review to the FFMPEG dev mailing list.
> >
>
> I think the goal is to get patches merged, not submitted.
>
┓┏┓┏┓┃
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:08 AM Michael Koch
wrote:
> Removing SDL2 sounds like a very bad idea. There are many examples which
> are using these output devices, and all these examples would be broken.
> A quick search in my book
> http://www.astro-electronic.de/FFmpeg_Book.pdf
> finds about 40 occ
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:06 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> As Jonatan reminded the ML we need to provide SoWs if we want to
> participate in STF-SPI
>
> We need one for each project (they do not need to list a person ATM)
> but obviously we do need someone who will do the work
>
> I d
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community
> wants.
> We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say we should
> skip the vote)
> (i am also CCing jonatan to make sure the option in
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 11:32 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf
wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> FOSDEM is upon us, in a few days.
>
> It would be a great idea to meet for a FFmpeg discussion, since quite a
> few of us will be there.
> So please bring your technical topics with you :)
>
Maybe it's more infra than
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:16 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 06 September 2023 at 18:27, Cosmin Stejerean via
> ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 17, 2023, at 11:36 PM, Damiano Galassi
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ping
> > >
> >
> > I believe this
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:15 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-01-30):
> > Sorry, but this feels a lot like “I have nothing to add to the
> > conversation, but I feel like I need to speak up anyway”.
>
> Well...
>
> > It's not a veto when mul
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:07 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Vittorio Giovara (12024-01-30):
> > Sorry but this feels a lot like "thanks for your feedback, I'm going to
> do
> > this anyway".
>
> Sorry, but this feels a lot like “I gave an objection, you ha
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:48 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> after people said they would help and start a wiki page (no not thilo dont
> blame him)
> I again wrote one myself. This is really early WIP
> it contains the application we would send to STF, this is NOT written by me
> and
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:19 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2024-01-29 21:09:42)
> > This is not something that should be discussed on a public ML
>
> Where do you think it should be discussed then?
>
IMO anywhere with a more limited set of constituents,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:22 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> > I have yet to see an actual project of "this magnitude" materialize as a
> proposal.
>
> you can suggest one ?
>
libavscale!
or there is nothing you want improved in FFmpeg ?
> Or only if SPI isnt involved or iam not sure what exact
1 - 100 of 603 matches
Mail list logo
