On 12/6/2020 8:13 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:28 PM James Almer wrote:
On 12/1/2020 3:09 PM, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
Ian, can you please take a look into it? And if it's fine to push it.
Thanks,
Mohammad
I removed the packet side data addition since it was not used
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:28 PM James Almer wrote:
>
> On 12/1/2020 3:09 PM, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> > Ian, can you please take a look into it? And if it's fine to push it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mohammad
>
> I removed the packet side data addition since it was not used by any
> module. It can be
On 12/1/2020 3:09 PM, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
Ian, can you please take a look into it? And if it's fine to push it.
Thanks,
Mohammad
I removed the packet side data addition since it was not used by any
module. It can be added when a demuxer needs to propagate it.
Also removed the entry for
Ian, can you please take a look into it? And if it's fine to push it.
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:29 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to
> be decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream.
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
The fate test file can be found here:
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:44 AM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Mohammad Izadi (2020-11-20 04:57:11)
> > From: Mohammad Izadi
> >
> > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs
> to be decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is
Quoting Mohammad Izadi (2020-11-20 04:57:11)
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
> decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
> data packet to be used or passed through.
> ---
> The fate test
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
The fate test file can be found here:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:19 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mohammad Izadi:
> > From: Mohammad Izadi
> >
> > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs
> to be decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred
> to
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
The fate test file can be found here:
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
The fate test file can be found here:
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
The fate test file can be found here:
Mohammad Izadi:
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
> decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
> data packet to be used or passed through.
>
> The fate test file can be found here:
>
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
The fate test file can be found here:
Thank you Ian for your great detailed comments.
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:10 PM Jan Ekström wrote:
> On 14.10.2020 2:53, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> > From: Mohammad Izadi
> >
> > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs
> to be decoded from ITU-T
On 14.10.2020 2:53, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
> decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
> data packet to be used or passed through.
>
> The fate test file can
Is anybody there? Any update? Can we push it to the head?
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:42 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> Any update? Can we push it to the head?
> Thanks,
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:53 AM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Jan! I hope you feel
Any update? Can we push it to the head?
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:53 AM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> Thank you, Jan! I hope you feel better soon.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 5:49 PM Jan Ekström wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:54 AM Mohammad Izadi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
Thank you, Jan! I hope you feel better soon.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 5:49 PM Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:54 AM Mohammad Izadi
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Mohammad Izadi
> >
> > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs
> to be decoded from ITU-T
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:54 AM Mohammad Izadi
wrote:
>
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
> decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
> data packet to be used or passed through.
>
> The
> On 23 Oct 2020, at 05:57, Mohammad Izadi
> wrote:
>
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:53 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
>
>> From: Mohammad Izadi
>>
>> [..]
Hi Mohammad,
Your change is in Patchwork here
Any comments?
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:53 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to
> be decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to
> side data packet to be used
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
The fate test file can be found here:
I will add the test by the end of this week.
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:09 AM Mohammad Izadi
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:30 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> > andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Mohammad
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:09 AM Mohammad Izadi
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:30 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mohammad Izadi:
> > > From: Mohammad Izadi
> > >
> > > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs
> > to be
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:22 PM Harry Mallon wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On 12 Aug 2020, at 21:58, Vittorio Giovara
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:40 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> >
> >> Vittorio,
> >>
> >> What is the next step for me?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mohammad
> >>
> >
> > Hi, I don't
> On 12 Aug 2020, at 21:58, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:40 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
>
>> Vittorio,
>>
>> What is the next step for me?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mohammad
>>
>
> Hi, I don't have any more comments for the patch, except that it would be
> nice if there
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:40 PM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> Vittorio,
>
> What is the next step for me?
>
> Thanks,
> Mohammad
>
Hi, I don't have any more comments for the patch, except that it would be
nice if there were some kind of fate testing.
See for example
Vittorio,
What is the next step for me?
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:51 AM Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> Any more comments? Are you OK to merge?
> Thanks,
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:06 AM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 27,
Any more comments? Are you OK to merge?
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:06 AM Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:44 PM Mohammad Izadi <
> izadi-at-google@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
> > It seems FATE is for the regression test. Here is a sample that you can
> use
> >
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:44 PM Mohammad Izadi <
izadi-at-google@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> It seems FATE is for the regression test. Here is a sample that you can use
> and check:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/3ewr2t2lvv2cy8d/20200727_143643.mp4?dl=0
>
>
Thanks I will check it out.
Fate is
It seems FATE is for the regression test. Here is a sample that you can use
and check:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3ewr2t2lvv2cy8d/20200727_143643.mp4?dl=0
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 7:53 AM Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:09 PM Mohammad Izadi <
>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:09 PM Mohammad Izadi <
izadi-at-google@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:30 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mohammad Izadi:
> > > From: Mohammad Izadi
> > >
> > > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment -
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:30 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mohammad Izadi:
> > From: Mohammad Izadi
> >
> > HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs
> to be decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred
> to
Mohammad Izadi:
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
> decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
> data packet to be used or passed through.
> ---
> libavcodec/avpacket.c | 1 +
>
On 7/23/2020 7:26 PM, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
>>> void av_fast_padded_malloc(void *ptr, unsigned int *size, size_t
>> min_size)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2346,3 +2359,170 @@ int ff_int_from_list_or_default(void *ctx, const
>> char * val_name, int val,
>>> "%s %d are not supported. Set to default
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
libavcodec/avpacket.c | 1 +
libavcodec/decode.c | 1 +
I am not sure if you received the patch in reply to the thread? I used:
git send-email 0001-Support-HDR10-metadata-for-HEVC.patch --to=
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org --in-reply-to=
422719c5-f010-6b39-6415-b3bf46dcb...@rothenpieler.org
It seems it created a new thread. Did you receive it?
Thanks,
From: Mohammad Izadi
HDR10+ is dynamic metadata (A/341 Amendment - SMPTE2094-40) that needs to be
decoded from ITU-T T.35 in HEVC bitstream. The HDR10+ is transferred to side
data packet to be used or passed through.
---
libavcodec/avpacket.c | 1 +
libavcodec/decode.c | 1 +
Thanks,
Mohammad
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:14 AM zhilizhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson <
> steinar+ffm...@gunderson.no> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:34:31PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >>> static AVMutex codec_mutex = AV_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>
Please see my answers inline:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:34 PM James Almer wrote:
> On 7/16/2020 4:23 PM, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> > From: Mohammad Izadi
> >
> > ---
> > libavcodec/avpacket.c | 1 +
> > libavcodec/decode.c | 1 +
> > libavcodec/hevc_sei.c | 40 +++---
> >
On 23/07/2020 10:13, zhilizhao wrote:
On Jul 17, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:34:31PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
static AVMutex codec_mutex = AV_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+static const uint8_t usa_country_code = 0xB5;
+static const uint16_t
> On Jul 17, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:34:31PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> static AVMutex codec_mutex = AV_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>>> +static const uint8_t usa_country_code = 0xB5;
>>> +static const uint16_t smpte_provider_code = 0x003C;
>>>
Please see my answers inline:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:30 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Do., 16. Juli 2020 um 21:24 Uhr schrieb Mohammad Izadi
> :
>
> > -user_identifier = get_bits_long(gb, 32);
> > -
> > -switch (user_identifier) {
> > -case MKBETAG('G', 'A', '9', '4'):
>
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:34:31PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> static AVMutex codec_mutex = AV_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>> +static const uint8_t usa_country_code = 0xB5;
>> +static const uint16_t smpte_provider_code = 0x003C;
>> +static const uint16_t smpte2094_40_provider_oriented_code = 0x0001;
>>
On 7/16/2020 4:29 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Do., 16. Juli 2020 um 21:24 Uhr schrieb Mohammad Izadi
> :
>
>> -user_identifier = get_bits_long(gb, 32);
>> -
>> -switch (user_identifier) {
>> -case MKBETAG('G', 'A', '9', '4'):
>
> Why did you have to change this existing
On 7/16/2020 4:23 PM, Mohammad Izadi wrote:
> From: Mohammad Izadi
>
> ---
> libavcodec/avpacket.c | 1 +
> libavcodec/decode.c | 1 +
> libavcodec/hevc_sei.c | 40 +++---
> libavcodec/hevc_sei.h | 5 ++
> libavcodec/hevcdec.c | 7 ++
> libavcodec/internal.h | 9 +++
>
Am Do., 16. Juli 2020 um 21:24 Uhr schrieb Mohammad Izadi
:
> -user_identifier = get_bits_long(gb, 32);
> -
> -switch (user_identifier) {
> -case MKBETAG('G', 'A', '9', '4'):
Why did you have to change this existing code?
Could you elaborate a little on the use-cases this patch
From: Mohammad Izadi
---
libavcodec/avpacket.c | 1 +
libavcodec/decode.c | 1 +
libavcodec/hevc_sei.c | 40 +++---
libavcodec/hevc_sei.h | 5 ++
libavcodec/hevcdec.c | 7 ++
libavcodec/internal.h | 9 +++
libavcodec/packet.h | 9 +++
libavcodec/utils.c| 180
49 matches
Mail list logo
