On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:06:46AM +0100, JULIAN GARDNER wrote:
[...]
I tried your suggestion of splitting the -map [vid[0:a] into -map [vid]
-map [0:a] and I get the following error message
Output with label '0:a' does not exist in any defined filter graph, or is
already used elsewhere.
The only sse4 instruction is pextrw, which is used on rather minor
functions for small blocks. Therefore use whichever GPR is available
to extract the output word.
Before (sse4), for block_w == 6:
4627 decicycles in epel_uni, 16377 runs, 7 skips
7422 decicycles in epel_bi, 65501 runs, 35 skips
---
libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm b/libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm
index e2236ec..9ce6bd1 100644
--- a/libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm
+++ b/libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ cglobal
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 08:46:31AM +, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
---
libavcodec/x86/hevc_mc.asm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
When you are offended at any man's
Hi,
2014-08-24 12:13 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at:
[...]
-if( avctx-bits_per_raw_sample )
+if ( avctx-bits_per_raw_sample
+ av_pix_fmt_desc_get(avctx-pix_fmt)-comp[0].depth_minus1 7)
maxdepth = (1 avctx-bits_per_raw_sample) - 1;
So
Carl Eugen Hoyos cehoyos at ag.or.at writes:
Attached patch fixes pnm encoding for me if
bits_per_raw_sample is set to a value different
from the pix_fmt's native value.
I should have mentioned that this was planned as
a [RFC] since I am not completely convinced we
want this but current
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 02:22:37PM -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Gu timothyg...@gmail.com
---
README| 12 +---
generate-doc.sh | 41 +
src/template_doctitle | 1 -
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 12
Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisquet at gmail.com writes:
Hi,
2014-08-24 12:48 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos cehoyos at ag.or.at:
I think [PATCH 2/5] pnmenc: use bits_per_raw_sample
is wrong then
Definitely, I still wonder how you tested it.
ljpeg 36bits from #2966 and having the
Am 24.08.14 00:23, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:24:33PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
--- This is 100% untested and probably doesn't even compile.
it does compile, but i dont have a ppc so i cant say if it would work
I can test that later today.
'make test' is what
Hi,
I think a first point must be cleared, seeing your reaction to my
pnmdec comment. Here' are the opinions:
- Mine: bits_per_raw_sample should indicate the dynamics of the signal
when it is different from the colorspace bitdepth
- ffmpeg's and yours (if I'm not mistaken): the signal bitdepth
Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisquet at gmail.com writes:
- ffmpeg's and yours (if I'm not mistaken): the signal
bitdepth should always match the colorspace one, and
bits_per_raw_sample should indicate the original bitdepth
I believe that my opinion is mostly irrelevant
but that FFmpeg's
Clément Bœsch u at pkh.me writes:
+OBJS-$(CONFIG_PIXELUTILS) += ppc/pixelutils_init.o
+
ALTIVEC-OBJS += ppc/float_dsp_altivec.o \
+ALTIVEC-OBJS-$(CONFIG_PIXELUTILS) += ppc/pixelutils_altivec.o \
Something is wrong here, I suspect the \ have
to be
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:28:56 +0200
Clément Bœsch u...@pkh.me wrote:
Hi,
Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms.
The proposition would be a mailing-list where the 2 projects would send
the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 07:26:32PM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
Hi,
2014-08-18 13:40 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at:
Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisquet at gmail.com writes:
If a profile was set, the automatic setting should
probably not overwrite it.
(If this is
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014, at 02:28 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup such
mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?
The neutral party should also be willing to regularly parse the pending
moderator requests for valid messages from
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:57:04 -0800
Lou Logan l...@lrcd.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014, at 02:28 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup
such mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?
The neutral party should also be willing to
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 08:59:41PM +0800, Hii wrote:
Currently -b_qfactor and -chromaoffset have no effect in libx264,
the attached patch is an attempt to fix the issue.
Move the corresponding lines after x264_param_default_preset() to
prevent them being overwritten by it, make the two
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:54:19PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:28:56 +0200
Clément Bœsch u...@pkh.me wrote:
Hi,
Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms.
The
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:11:26PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 13/08/14 1:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On 13.08.2014, at 12:48, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote:
Might it be useful to add some of those special samples to fate?
Probably. The first 10 frames of the sample
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:35:28 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:54:19PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:28:56 +0200
Clément Bœsch u...@pkh.me wrote:
Hi,
Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 07:37:59PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:11:26PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 13/08/14 1:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On 13.08.2014, at 12:48, Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com wrote:
Might it be useful to add some of those
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:47:02PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Fixes CID1231992
Suggested-by: Timothy Gu timothyg...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
In a
On 24.08.2014, at 14:02, Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisq...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think a first point must be cleared, seeing your reaction to my
pnmdec comment. Here' are the opinions:
- Mine: bits_per_raw_sample should indicate the dynamics of the signal
when it is different from the
23 matches
Mail list logo
