2019-02-03 18:37 GMT+01:00, frhun :
> Please write example
$ ffmpeg -i input -i raw.yuv -filter_complex overlay out.mov.
Please don't top-post here, Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
2019-02-03 21:16 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
> Am 03.02.19 um 21:06 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
>> It's a shortening of "Top Field First" (TFF). With interlaced video
>> you have a choice of whether the top or bottom field (odd numbered
>> lines/even numbered lines) comes before the other in the digital
Ulf Zibis wrote:
>Does the 'p' in yuv420p mean "progressive"?
No, it means "planar". Best regards, Reto
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
Am 03.02.19 um 21:06 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
> It's a shortening of "Top Field First" (TFF). With interlaced video
> you have a choice of whether the top or bottom field (odd numbered
> lines/even numbered lines) comes before the other in the digital stream.
I know this, but Carl Eugen said, that
Am 03.02.19 um 16:52 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
> Hi Carl Eugen,
>
> For me it's ok to close that discussion here. You did a lot of effort to
> explain me many details, much thanks for that. I can live with the
> remaining unclarity.
But could you please tell me the meaning of "top first" in ffprobe
On 2/3/2019 11:58 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
But could you please tell me the meaning of "top first" in ffprobe
output of the vob file, which is missing after transcoding to mp4.
It's a shortening of "Top Field First" (TFF). With interlaced video you have
a choice of whether the top or bottom field
Am 03.02.19 um 17:17 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> They do not look like comb artefacts as caused by interlaced
> recording to me.
Thanks, here I respect your experience with video material I don't have.
But these artefacts must have to do with horizontal motion, as they
don't appear in "normal"
Please write example
thanks!
Robert
2019. 02. 01. 20:11 keltezéssel, Carl Eugen Hoyos írta:
2019-01-28 19:39 GMT+01:00, frhun :
Hi all
I am new in the mail list.
I from Hungary, I usualy helped sport competition, streaming to youtube...
I hope someone helps me.
I have a ip cam ( hikvision)
Am 02.02.2019 um 19:34 schrieb Michael Koch:
Am 02.02.2019 um 19:28 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On 2/2/19, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 02.02.2019 um 19:01 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On 2/2/19, Michael Koch wrote:
Hi all,
I have two suggestions for improvement:
1. It would be nice if the curves filter
Hi Mustafa Al Ani,
How do you deal with the delay variations when loss of unrecoverable
packets occurs? In my case, the delay decreases. For example, it goes from
400ms to 0ms. The playback jumps forward. At the moment I do not know how
to avoid this.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:36 AM Mustafa Al Ani
2019-02-03 11:58 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
> Am 01.02.19 um 20:00 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>>> But for the rest of the video, I'm wondering that I nowhere notice such
>>> dropouts. IIRC I read, that the film was produced with a budget of
>>> 20.000 DM, which IMHO is not enough for a 76 min.
Am 03.02.19 um 16:47 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> 2019-02-03 16:31 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
>> Also I'm missing even few celluloid dropouts in the whole video.
> But this does not rule out progressive digital video.
There was no digital video in 1982.
-Ulf
Hi Carl Eugen,
Am 03.02.19 um 14:06 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>>> Second:
>>> libx264 does support interlaced encoding (but not field
> (It appears as if you didn't read this sentence: It does not
> mean "you can feed anything into libx264, it will somehow
> deal with it", it means "libx264 does
2019-02-03 16:31 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
> Also I'm missing even few celluloid dropouts in the whole video.
But this does not rule out progressive digital video.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Am 03.02.19 um 13:56 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> Otherwise I can't explain the comb artefacts at some
>> areas.
> I don't really see them, I see many artefacts.
I have marked what I interpret as comb artefacts in the attachment.
Also I'm missing even few celluloid dropouts in the whole video.
2019-02-03 11:57 GMT+01:00, Christian Knoefel :
> i need one ffmpeg for windows7 64bit, but with pthread support.
Could you explain what does not work with a Zeranoe binary?
Carl Eugen
(who still hasn't seen a non-broken compile script.)
___
2019-02-02 21:22 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
> Am 02.02.19 um 02:18 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> Second:
>> libx264 does support interlaced encoding (but not field
(It appears as if you didn't read this sentence: It does not
mean "you can feed anything into libx264, it will somehow
deal with it",
2019-02-02 20:32 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
> Am 02.02.19 um 19:27 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
>> But if I have a interlaced encoded stream with interlaced content, I
>> guess only both steps at same time ensure to get a progressive stream
>> with good visual quality.
>
> For this case I see 2 options.
2019-02-02 19:27 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
> Am 02.02.19 um 18:38 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> 2019-02-01 23:46 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>>> Am 30.01.19 um 15:08 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Without interpolation, this is what all video players do if you disable
all de-interlacing.
The
2019-02-03 11:58 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis :
>
> Am 01.02.19 um 20:00 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>>> But for the rest of the video, I'm wondering that I nowhere notice such
>>> dropouts. IIRC I read, that the film was produced with a budget of
>>> 20.000 DM, which IMHO is not enough for a 76 min.
On 03-02-2019 04:27 PM, Christian Knoefel wrote:
Hello,
i need one ffmpeg for windows7 64bit, but with pthread support.
can i download it anywhere? Or *must* i compile it complicated under
my windows?
The comping process is not easy...
Look into this autobuild script:
Am 01.02.19 um 20:00 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> But for the rest of the video, I'm wondering that I nowhere notice such
>> dropouts. IIRC I read, that the film was produced with a budget of
>> 20.000 DM, which IMHO is not enough for a 76 min. celluloid film.
>>
>> Additionally in the turning
Hello,
i need one ffmpeg for windows7 64bit, but with pthread support.
can i download it anywhere? Or *must* i compile it complicated under my
windows?
The comping process is not easy...
Christian
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
I second Alex,
We use SRT to send low latency stream from Copenhagen Denmark to NY, Ohio,
and LA in the USA.
R,
Mustafa
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 4:30 PM Alex Molon wrote:
> SRT forever!
>
> Simple, stable, low latency, transports any MPEG-TS content.
> It is designed expressely for hi quality
I'm streaming from an ip camera to youtube live. Windows 10 installed some
update when I had to reboot. Now ffmpeg only does about 15fps and the
upload bandwidth seems limited to 6000kbps. I've tried with a couple
different ip cameras and it's the same. I also tried with the newest
version of
25 matches
Mail list logo
