Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg-devel signup and patch status

Hi, I tried to sign up on FFmpeg-devel, but the reset password is not reaching me. your mail is not subscribed to ffmpeg-devel (yet). Did you check your spam for registration mails? GMail behaves very strict sometimes, trying another mail address might be worth it in the long run if this

[FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg-devel signup and patch status

Hello, I tried to sign up on FFmpeg-devel, but the reset password is not reaching me. The patch I would submit is just this patch but based on version 7.0 and with an updated doc/protocols.texi. I think that was the reason this was not merged before?

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and ffprobe 7.0 cannot read video files from the Sony A7SIII camera

Good evening, I have upgraded ffmpeg (and ffprobe) from 6.1.1 to 7.0 and the Sony A7SIII video files can no longer be read. I can supply a test file if required. Regards, Jean Example with 6.1.1 (correct) ffprobe C0033.MP4 ffprobe version 6.1.1 Copyright (c) 2007-2023 the FFmpeg developers

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg built without liblensfun

Hi all, I've been trying to figure out how to correct lens distortion in video for a very long time, but tonight have discovered that ffmpeg has a plugin for the excellent lensfun library but the ubuntu PPA packaged versions for 22.04 are built with --disable-liblensfun (why oh why?). Does

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 01:23 schrieb John Hawkinson: Zathras: It appears your assumption (6) that the files are "exactly the same" because the spectrograms are the same is not correct. I downloaded https://www2.cs.uic.edu/~i101/SoundFiles/BabyElephantWalk60.wav as a test file and converted it with

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 02:23:16 +0200, Ferdi Scholten wrote: > > what is this supposed to be? > > 16 Bit with 44,1 kHz (CD) are sufficient. > > So, we have PCM_S16BE and PCM_S16LE. > > > > Whats the exact command to get it done? > > Youtube simply does not accept lossless audio in a video (at

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 1:12 AM Zathras Yes wrote: > Hi, > > as i have mentioned to Mr. Reindl, the online-converter > https://www.freeconvert.com/wav-to-mov does the trick. > > ffmpeg should be able to do the same, I suppose. > May be, I am in error, may be not... > > 1. make a wav-files (16

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Hi, what is this supposed to be? 16 Bit with 44,1 kHz (CD) are sufficient. So, we have PCM_S16BE and PCM_S16LE. Whats the exact command to get it done? Thx Youtube simply does not accept lossless audio in a video (at all). You have to encode according to their specifications. They

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Zathras: It appears your assumption (6) that the files are "exactly the same" because the spectrograms are the same is not correct. I downloaded https://www2.cs.uic.edu/~i101/SoundFiles/BabyElephantWalk60.wav as a test file and converted it with the freeoconvert.com online converter, and ffprobe

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Hi, as i have mentioned to Mr. Reindl, the online-converter https://www.freeconvert.com/wav-to-mov does the trick. ffmpeg should be able to do the same, I suppose. May be, I am in error, may be not... 1. make a wav-files (16 Bit, 44.1 kHz) "sound.wav" 2. use the mentioned online converter from

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

пт, 24 мая 2024 г., 01:37 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 24.05.24 um 00:34 schrieb Zathras Yes: > > Yes, I know that. Just add a picture and it's fine. > > MOV with PCM/WAV is never fine > from compatibility with older software? yes. Youtube probably does not want to serve relatively huge lossless

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:34 schrieb Zathras Yes: Yes, I know that. Just add a picture and it's fine. MOV with PCM/WAV is never fine Please don't repeat all this over and over, because it is tiresome. if you won't be an idiot you would understand it by telling once For this now, I will not

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:31 schrieb Zathras Yes: Well, I am not ignorant, just stating the facts, especially about the online-converter. What you are writing contradicts with the facts here: It's not a matter of liking or not, it's a fact. * Now, I tell you what: 1. make a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Yes, I know that. Just add a picture and it's fine. Please don't repeat all this over and over, because it is tiresome. For this now, I will not further answer to you! Thx. On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:32 AM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 24.05.24 um 00:29 schrieb Zathras Yes: > > Supported

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:29 schrieb Zathras Yes: Supported file formats: - - PCM audio in WAV container So, it seems possible to put a wav into a youtube-video, right? How to do it? https://support.google.com/youtube/troubleshooter/2888402?hl=en Note: Audio files, like MP3, WAV, or PCM

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Well, I am not ignorant, just stating the facts, especially about the online-converter. What you are writing contradicts with the facts here: It's not a matter of liking or not, it's a fact. * Now, I tell you what: 1. make a wav-files (16 Bit, 44.1 kHz) "sound.wav" 2.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Supported file formats: - - PCM audio in WAV container So, it seems possible to put a wav into a youtube-video, right? How to do it? On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:26 AM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 24.05.24 um 00:22 schrieb Zathras Yes: > > Now, I tell you what: > > > > 1. make a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:25 schrieb Zathras Yes: Well, why being so rude? because you are ignorant Than would you be so kind to explain, why the online converter does the trick? it don't I would expect, that ffmpeg could do the same, right? a MOV-CONTAINER can't contain WAV/PCM youtube

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:22 schrieb Zathras Yes: Now, I tell you what: 1. make a wav-files (16 Bit, 44.1 kHz) "sound.wav" i did 2. use the mentioned online converter from "sound.wav" to "upload.mov" i did and i posted you the error screen 3. Upload this "upload.mov" to youtube impossible

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Well, why being so rude? Than would you be so kind to explain, why the online converter does the trick? I would expect, that ffmpeg could do the same, right? On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:22 AM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 24.05.24 um 00:17 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > > > > Am 24.05.24 um

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Now, I tell you what: 1. make a wav-files (16 Bit, 44.1 kHz) "sound.wav" 2. use the mentioned online converter from "sound.wav" to "upload.mov" 3. Upload this "upload.mov" to youtube. 4. Go to the youtube-link and download the file "download.mov" 5. extract the sound file out of "download.mov"

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:17 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 24.05.24 um 00:12 schrieb Zathras Yes: Ok, instead of repeating here over and over: First question: Is video with lossless sound possible for youtube? Yes or No answer please. no - and whatever you upload to youtube will be finally

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Hi, what is this supposed to be? 16 Bit with 44,1 kHz (CD) are sufficient. So, we have PCM_S16BE and PCM_S16LE. Whats the exact command to get it done? Thx On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:14 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > пт, 24 мая 2024 г., 01:00 Reindl Harald : > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 24.05.24 um 00:12 schrieb Zathras Yes: Ok, instead of repeating here over and over: First question: Is video with lossless sound possible for youtube? Yes or No answer please. no - and whatever you upload to youtube will be finally re-encoded anyways - you won't find any WAV audio on

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

пт, 24 мая 2024 г., 01:00 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 23.05.24 um 23:44 schrieb Zathras Yes: > > And yes, a conversion of the soundfiles is not wanted, exactly. > > > > In a picky manner of speaking, it is a conversion of one file to another, > > but let''s not go into this nitpicking here. > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Ok, instead of repeating here over and over: First question: Is video with lossless sound possible for youtube? Yes or No answer please. Second question: How to create such a files with ffmpeg? (The mentioned online converter can do this) What's the ffmpeg command for it? Thx On Fri, May

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 23.05.24 um 23:44 schrieb Zathras Yes: And yes, a conversion of the soundfiles is not wanted, exactly. In a picky manner of speaking, it is a conversion of one file to another, but let''s not go into this nitpicking here. again: "-acodec copy" is NOT a conversion - you are pumping a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 23.05.24 um 23:44 schrieb Zathras Yes: Sorry, but what you are saying here is simply plain *wrong* ! There *is* lossless music in mov. The online converter does exactly that https://www.freeconvert.com/wav-to-mov You can try this for yourself, if you don't believe it. i did and it IS

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 23.05.24 um 23:30 schrieb Zathras Yes: Hello, I like to upload lossless sound to youtube. ok, i forgot to add a picture. so, we take this ffmpeg.exe -i picture.jpg -i music.wav -acodec copy upload.mov This gives a video with lossless audio, right? (It's playing perfectly on my

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Hello, I like to upload lossless sound to youtube. ok, i forgot to add a picture. so, we take this ffmpeg.exe -i picture.jpg -i music.wav -acodec copy upload.mov This gives a video with lossless audio, right? (It's playing perfectly on my computer) But youtube does not except his. If the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 23.05.24 um 23:01 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 23.05.24 um 22:10 schrieb Zathras Yes: Hello, what is the command to put a wav-Sound file lossless into a mov-File in order to upload it correctly to youtube? For example, this does *not* work for youtube ffmpeg.exe -i music.wav -acodec

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Am 23.05.24 um 22:10 schrieb Zathras Yes: Hello, what is the command to put a wav-Sound file lossless into a mov-File in order to upload it correctly to youtube? For example, this does *not* work for youtube ffmpeg.exe -i music.wav -acodec copy upload.mov what makes you think you can use

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg wav lossless to youtube mov?

Hello, what is the command to put a wav-Sound file lossless into a mov-File in order to upload it correctly to youtube? For example, this does *not* work for youtube ffmpeg.exe -i music.wav -acodec copy upload.mov Thx ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 6.1.1 fails to compile with mingw-w64 gcc 14

Am 17.05.24 um 19:20 schrieb Andrew Randrianasulu: maybe - but it's nonsense to start a topic with an older version - the first thing you have to do in case of compiler errors is to try the latest version why? because it maybe already fixed and you waste everyobdys time playing yround and

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 6.1.1 fails to compile with mingw-w64 gcc 14

пт, 17 мая 2024 г., 20:02 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 17.05.24 um 17:58 schrieb Biswapriyo Nath: > >> what about trying the latest version instead 6.1.1 from last year when > >> you use a compiler even newer than on Fedora 39? > > > > The same issue was reported with 7.0 release > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 6.1.1 fails to compile with mingw-w64 gcc 14

Am 17.05.24 um 17:58 schrieb Biswapriyo Nath: what about trying the latest version instead 6.1.1 from last year when you use a compiler even newer than on Fedora 39? The same issue was reported with 7.0 release https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11004. I am using msys2/mingw-w64 toolchain to

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 6.1.1 fails to compile with mingw-w64 gcc 14

> what about trying the latest version instead 6.1.1 from last year when > you use a compiler even newer than on Fedora 39? The same issue was reported with 7.0 release https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11004. I am using msys2/mingw-w64 toolchain to compile ffmpeg. I guess the same compiler error

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 6.1.1 fails to compile with mingw-w64 gcc 14

Am 17.05.24 um 15:32 schrieb Biswapriyo Nath: * gcc version: 14.1.0 * build options: https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-ffmpeg/PKGBUILD * compiler error: ffmpeg-6.1.1/libavutil/hwcontext_qsv.c:756:68: error: passing argument 3 of 'devmgr->lpVtbl->LockDevice' from

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 6.1.1 fails to compile with mingw-w64 gcc 14

* gcc version: 14.1.0 * build options: https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-ffmpeg/PKGBUILD * compiler error: ffmpeg-6.1.1/libavutil/hwcontext_qsv.c:756:68: error: passing argument 3 of 'devmgr->lpVtbl->LockDevice' from incompatible pointer type

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg

Am 17.05.24 um 06:42 schrieb Keith Reno: I have ffmpeg-7.0-full_build downloaded on my computer. When I select ffmpeg the screen flashes but nothing loads. Do I have the correct version or am I doing something wrong? ffmpeg is a CLI program

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg

Keith: On 2024-05-16 21:42, Keith Reno wrote: I have ffmpeg-7.0-full_build downloaded on my computer. When I select ffmpeg the screen flashes but nothing loads. Do I have the correct version or am I doing something wrong? Keith Welcome to the fun, fun world of FFmpeg! Apologies for

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg

On 2024-05-17 10:12 am, Keith Reno wrote: I have ffmpeg-7.0-full_build downloaded on my computer. When I select ffmpeg the screen flashes but nothing loads. Do I have the correct version or am I doing something wrong? Read

[FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg

I have ffmpeg-7.0-full_build downloaded on my computer. When I select ffmpeg the screen flashes but nothing loads. Do I have the correct version or am I doing something wrong? Keith Sent from Mail for Windows

[FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG concatenating a transcode as 59.88 fps instead of 60 fps

Hello all, I am transcoding an image sequence to a 10 frame 60fps .mov files using the first command below. I am then concatenating the exported videos using the second command below. *Transcode* ffmpeg -y -r 60 -probesize 13M -start_number 1001 -i 'input_video.%04d.jpeg' -c:v libx265 -pix_fmt

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg] getting errors while running ffmpeg locally.

Hello Reindl, Thank you for reverting back Following are the details you have asked package version : 6.1.1 Operating System : Windows 10 I will install the nasm and yasm packages and revert back to you after the installation. Thanks again. On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 7:18 PM Reindl Harald wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg] getting errors while running ffmpeg locally.

Am 16.04.24 um 15:43 schrieb B-2014 Ariyan Kashyap: Getting this err while running ./configure --enable-shared ./configure --enable-shared nasm/yasm not found or too old. Use --disable-x86asm for a crippled build. so why don't you just install "nasm" or "yasm" or at least tell us your

[FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg] getting errors while running ffmpeg locally.

Getting this err while running ./configure --enable-shared ./configure --enable-shared nasm/yasm not found or too old. Use --disable-x86asm for a crippled build. If you think configure made a mistake, make sure you are using the latest version from Git. If the latest version fails, report the

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg doesn't generate a ISO/IEC 14496-17 (MPEG-4 text) track when ingesting WebVTT subtitles to produce MPEGTS

Hi everyone, We are trying to create a mpegts with a ISO/IEC 14496-17 (MPEG-4 text) subtitles track, using WebVTT, but seems like ffmpeg creates a ISO 13818-1 PES private data instead. The following is the ffmpeg command: ffmpeg -i subtitle.vtt -c:s mov_text -f mpegts output3GPP.ts And the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture Datum: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:39:54 +0100 Von: Paul B Mahol Antwort an: FFmpeg user questions An: FFmpeg user questions On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:21 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 13/02/2024 03.24, Paul B Mahol wr

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

> Why you insist on 'should' is question for you, I doubt we will ever get > the answer. > My impression is he's looking for a way to use/turn a swiss army knife as/into a scalpel, if this analogy makes sense. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 3:11 AM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 13/02/2024 20.27, amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote: > >>> params *before* "-i" are *input params* > >>> params *after* "-i" are *output params* > >>> > >>> that has *always* been the case at least for 15 years and so it's > >>> logical

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 13/02/2024 20.27, amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote: params *before* "-i" are *input params* params *after* "-i" are *output params* that has *always* been the case at least for 15 years and so it's logical that you can't place a param at a random position by common sense and expect the same

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

> > params *before* "-i" are *input params* > > params *after* "-i" are *output params* > > > > that has *always* been the case at least for 15 years and so it's > > logical that you can't place a param at a random position by common > > sense and expect the same result > > Thank you, Harald. I

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 13/02/2024 14.13, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.02.24 um 19:39 schrieb Paul B Mahol: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:21 PM Mark Filipak wrote: On 13/02/2024 03.24, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:37 AM Carl Zwanzig wrote: Paul, Carl, I assume you are both familiar with the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

Am 13.02.24 um 19:39 schrieb Paul B Mahol: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:21 PM Mark Filipak wrote: On 13/02/2024 03.24, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:37 AM Carl Zwanzig wrote: Paul, Carl, I assume you are both familiar with the source code. I'm not. Fact: '-ss'-before-'-i'

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:21 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 13/02/2024 03.24, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:37 AM Carl Zwanzig wrote: > > Paul, Carl, I assume you are both familiar with the source code. I'm not. > > Fact: '-ss'-before-'-i' and '-i'-before-'-ss' _do_ give

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 13/02/2024 03.24, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:37 AM Carl Zwanzig wrote: Paul, Carl, I assume you are both familiar with the source code. I'm not. Fact: '-ss'-before-'-i' and '-i'-before-'-ss' _do_ give different results. I suggested that the difference might result

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 2/13/2024 8:37 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: "read time" reaL time z! ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 2/13/2024 12:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Even if implemented properly it will not make real-time not working. FFmpeg does not have real variable filter chains. Everything is static, there are only filters that can be auto inserted once in a while. Granted, AFAICT much of how ffmpeg is used

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:37 AM Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 2/12/2024 2:59 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > I doubt anything above applies to FFmpeg, also I doubt it makes > difference > > for real-time streaming. > > Hmm, actually it looks like a lot of it could apply if implemented > properly >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

Am 13.02.24 um 00:31 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed: Go away, or at least shut up after dozens of useless posts why don't you? ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 2/12/2024 3:31 PM, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote: Go away, or at least shut up. I encourage you do do that if you can't add to the conversation. z! ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture

On 2/12/2024 2:59 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: I doubt anything above applies to FFmpeg, also I doubt it makes difference for real-time streaming. Hmm, actually it looks like a lot of it could apply if implemented properly (there are a fair few video programs which implement some form of

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture (was: Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented)

Even though I used the word "or" in my post, the use of any of the architectural techniques can be mixed. On the subject of you being a troll, you wrote that you posted no more than 6 posts a year. That turns out to be ‘a day’ Go away, or at least shut up.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture (was: Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented)

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:40 PM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 12/02/2024 11.30, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:48 AM Mark Filipak > > > wrote: > >> Does FFmpeg do any internal scripting or dynamic code building/linking? > > > > Please define what you mean by these concepts. > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture (was: Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented)

On 12/02/2024 11.30, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:48 AM Mark Filipak wrote: Does FFmpeg do any internal scripting or dynamic code building/linking? Please define what you mean by these concepts. Happy to, Paul. Internal scripting is when a task is built using a scripting

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture (was: Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented)

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:48 AM Mark Filipak wrote: > On 12/02/2024 03.21, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Mark wants single command example to work 100% correct in 100% situations > > and that output is 100% correct 100% of time. > > Yes. Of course. > > > That is possible only for very trivial

[FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg Architecture (was: Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented)

On 12/02/2024 03.21, Paul B Mahol wrote: Mark wants single command example to work 100% correct in 100% situations and that output is 100% correct 100% of time. Yes. Of course. That is possible only for very trivial containers only currently. And because libs are very low level it can not be

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg interrupted (SIGSTOP signal) but pipewire shows its node is still running

On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:34:09 GMT, Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote: gnusuario--- via ffmpeg-user (12024-02-05): > I want to know if it is possible to stop recording sound while the > process is paused (stopped in signal terms). FFmpeg cannot do ANYTHING after receiving a SIGSTOP. So you

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg interrupted (SIGSTOP signal) but pipewire shows its node is still running

gnusuario--- via ffmpeg-user (12024-02-05): > I want to know if it is possible to stop recording sound while the > process is paused (stopped in signal terms). FFmpeg cannot do ANYTHING after receiving a SIGSTOP. So you would need either sending TSTP and see if it behaves better, or take it to

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg interrupted (SIGSTOP signal) but pipewire shows its node is still running

To be more precise, the node in pw-top is named after the library FFmpeg uses: Lavf60.16.100. In top all threads of ffmpeg are suspended (T). On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:33:20 GMT, gnusuario--- via ffmpeg-user ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org wrote: Forgot to mention that the FFmpeg version is the ome from

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg interrupted (SIGSTOP signal) but pipewire shows its node is still running

Forgot to mention that the FFmpeg version is the ome from Packman repositories. 6.1.1. On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:29:13 GMT, gnusuario--- via ffmpeg-user ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org wrote: I'm using FFmpeg to save screencasts to disk. I start FFmpeg and pause, continue or stop the screencast

[FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg interrupted (SIGSTOP signal) but pipewire shows its node is still running

I'm using FFmpeg to save screencasts to disk. I start FFmpeg and pause, continue or stop the screencast by sending signals to the process. I found out that in recorded screencasts with pauses the audio does not pause and continues as if FFmpeg was actively running. Because of that, after

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg destroying the video stream when copying from m2ts to m2ts

Dear all, I have a m2ts file that contains one video track and 14 other audio and subtitle tracks. I'd like to copy the video track into a new m2ts file. This basically works, but ffmpeg is doing something bad to the video track while copying. The new file plays in VLC and MPC-HC, but the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月22日 周一18:20写道： > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 13:10, Steven Liu wrote: > > > Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月21日周日 00:42写道： > > > > > > > > > Perfect, and thanks for considering a revert of this deprecated > feature. > > > > Hi Dennis, > > > > Need more talk, Why don't try to use

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 13:10, Steven Liu wrote: > Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月21日周日 00:42写道： > > > > > > Perfect, and thanks for considering a revert of this deprecated feature. > > Hi Dennis, > > Need more talk, Why don't try to use hls_flags > +delete_segments+append_list. ? > > > Thanks > Steven >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月21日周日 00:42写道： > > > Perfect, and thanks for considering a revert of this deprecated feature. Hi Dennis, Need more talk, Why don't try to use hls_flags +delete_segments+append_list. ? Thanks Steven ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 18:42, Steven Liu wrote: > Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月20日 周六23:15写道： > > > On Sat, 20 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm Steven Liu, > wrote: > > > > > Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月20日 周六21:02写道： > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Is there a valid technical reason as to why FFmpeg's HLS muxer >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月20日 周六23:15写道： > On Sat, 20 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm Steven Liu, wrote: > > > Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月20日 周六21:02写道： > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Is there a valid technical reason as to why FFmpeg's HLS muxer dropped > > the > > > hls_wrap option? > > > > > > eg. three player

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

On Sat, 20 Jan 2024, 6:09 pm Steven Liu, wrote: > Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月20日 周六21:02写道： > > > Hello, > > > > Is there a valid technical reason as to why FFmpeg's HLS muxer dropped > the > > hls_wrap option? > > > eg. three player playing the list and every fragment less or equal 1 second > , > 1.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg's HLS muxer's deprecation of the hls_wrap option

Dennis Mungai 于2024年1月20日 周六21:02写道： > Hello, > > Is there a valid technical reason as to why FFmpeg's HLS muxer dropped the > hls_wrap option? eg. three player playing the list and every fragment less or equal 1 second , 1. Player 1 from fragment1, fragment2 2. Now Player 2 from fragment 1,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG filter_complex overlays work well on windows but generates error on Linux and OSX

Suraj Kadam (12023-12-22): >for (let i = 0; i < pngPaths.length; i++) { Hi. Nobody will try to understand your script in order to help you. You need to simplify your command-line as much as possible while still exposing the issue, and post it as is on the list along with the complete console

[FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG filter_complex overlays work well on windows but generates error on Linux and OSX

So, I am applying multiple overlays on a video using FFMPEG, on windows it always works fine for every size and number of overlays, but in case of MAC or Linux, it generates error for reinitializing filters. Let's say I have a video of 190MB, and about 182 overlay PNGs which will be overlayed

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

> On 19 Dec 2023, at 17:24, Erik Dobberkau wrote: > >> >> @Shuto: I'm sure you've noticed already that you will want to adjust the >> frame rate (option "-r"). But I'm not sure if that does also require an >> adjustment of the -bufsize . >> > > @Bouke: and it works without explicitly

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

> I understand that RDD-9 is necessary, but even after reading the article, I > don't know where RDD-9 is. > RDD 9 is Sony's Registered Disclosure Document for the XDCAM file format [1]. You can download the document from IEEExplore [2] if you have an account (e.g. via a SMPTE membership,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

@Eril Thank you for answering I understand that RDD-9 is necessary, but even after reading the article, I don't know where RDD-9 is. I couldn't fix it myself. Please tell me more details. 2023年12月20日(水) 1:16 Erik Dobberkau : > > > > Trust me, this command (besides audio parsing, depending on

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

@ Bouke Thank you for answering. It didn't work. I tried referring to your command, but the situation did not change. Please let me know if there are any other improvements. Also, it seems that the -map_channel option will be removed. If you know an alternative pan filter command, please let me

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

>> On 19 Dec 2023, at 17:16, Erik Dobberkau wrote: >> >>> >>> Trust me, this command (besides audio parsing, depending on sources) >>> has made thousands of broadcast compliant files over here, where >>> XDCAM is also mandatory. >>> >> >> Does that mean the issue mentioned here: >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

> On 19 Dec 2023, at 17:16, Erik Dobberkau wrote: > >> >> Trust me, this command (besides audio parsing, depending on sources) has >> made thousands of broadcast compliant files over here, where XDCAM is also >> mandatory. >> > > Does that mean the issue mentioned here: >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

> > @Shuto: I'm sure you've noticed already that you will want to adjust the > frame rate (option "-r"). But I'm not sure if that does also require an > adjustment of the -bufsize . > @Bouke: and it works without explicitly specifying a GOP size of 12 (for 50Hz 15 for 60-ish Hz) and a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

> > Trust me, this command (besides audio parsing, depending on sources) has > made thousands of broadcast compliant files over here, where XDCAM is also > mandatory. > Does that mean the issue mentioned here: https://www.mail-archive.com/ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org/msg26313.html (and its follow-up

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

Top posting, as my mail client does now allow for decent parsing, and I’m fed up with that. My command to create ‘’proper” XDcam HD 50Mb, as required by the broadcasters here. Read between the filenames, it does work. /Applications/ffmpeg -hide_banner -threads 0 -i /Users/bouke/yadda.mov -f

[FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg default processing(invisible processing)

I'm trying to use ffmpeg to generate an MXF file that can be played on an XDCAM XDS-PD2000. Please tell me what default processing is performed in ffmpeg when no options are entered. [background] Sony's check tool outputs an error saying "MXF metadata contains non-standard values". The data

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

On 2023-12-17 13:22, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote: On 17 Dec 2023, at 20:44, Nik Armstrong wrote: On 2023-12-16 15:01, Erik Dobberkau wrote: The ildct flag appears only to be making the output file "think" it is interlaced, when it is, in fact, progressive. It does not seem to be doing

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

Sometimes it’s wanted / needed to have all files ’the same’. > If that is interlaced, it’s interlaced. Codec should say ‘interlaced’, no > matter the actual content. > > For Avid media, that might (depending on the version of MC) be important > for a ‘fast import’, or omitting adapters you don’t

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

> On 17 Dec 2023, at 20:44, Nik Armstrong wrote: > > On 2023-12-16 15:01, Erik Dobberkau wrote: >> The ildct flag appears only to be making the output file "think" it is >>> interlaced, when it is, in fact, progressive. It does not seem to be doing >>> anything to change the footage

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

On 2023-12-16 15:01, Erik Dobberkau wrote: The ildct flag appears only to be making the output file "think" it is interlaced, when it is, in fact, progressive. It does not seem to be doing anything to change the footage (quality-wise and it's still progressive). Since someone other than myself

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

The ildct flag appears only to be making the output file "think" it is > interlaced, when it is, in fact, progressive. It does not seem to be doing > anything to change the footage (quality-wise and it's still progressive). > Since someone other than myself set the flag on this command, I am

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

On 2023-12-14 12:50, Nik Armstrong wrote: I've encountered a scenario where someone else has programmed an ffmpeg encoding command with flags that seem puzzling, and I'm having difficulty understanding their purpose. The command in question is: ffmpeg -loglevel info -y -r 29.97 -start_number 0

[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and use of the ildct flag in progressive encoding

I've encountered a scenario where someone else has programmed an ffmpeg encoding command with flags that seem puzzling, and I'm having difficulty understanding their purpose. The command in question is: ffmpeg -loglevel info -y -r 29.97 -start_number 0 -i image_sequence_%4d.png -vcodec dnxhd

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >