http://www.nikontechusa.com/
and Nikonscan 3.1.2 is listed
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Shunith Dutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC
James/Enoch
You know, i
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2001 01:52
James/Enoch
You know, i must have spent an hour hunting for it on the
Nikon sites... going in thru www.nikon.com and then following
links... on the us site (it's a black and white effect)
Hi Paul,
There are a few people on this list who use the Canon FS4000, so
hopefully someone will come to your aid soon.
Your do have another option in a 4000 dpi 35mm scanner under $1000 US.
That is the Polaroid SS4000, which is being offered in the $500-700 US
range after rebate. Although
I just released VueScan 7.3.6 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.3.6
* Set the default monitor color space on Mac OS to Apple RGB
* Enabled 14 bit scans on AGFA Arcus 1200
* Increased range of focus
For those that cant get it via HTTP or FTP it available from my site.
Here
http://www.jgrove.dynodns.net
--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
Ed writes ...
I just realized I have something backwards in VueScan 7.3.5.
The ICC profile for Adobe RGB has a gamma of 2.2 and
the ICC profile for Apple RGB has a gamma of 1.8. I had
this backwards in the code.
I'll fix this in 7.3.6 in the next day or so. Sorry for the
inconvenience.
I disagree ... what we end up with in Photoshop should never go thru the
gamut funnel you describe above. What we end up in Photoshop should be
the result of as few profile conversions as possible, and only one should
be
needed ... i.e.:
sorry, didnt i say that?
device space = scanner
Ed,
will this scanner ever be supported on Vuescan?
Thanks
Tim A
In a message dated 12/19/2001 10:47:33 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
will this scanner ever be supported on Vuescan?
This scanner uses the National Semiconductor LM983X
chip to control the scanner. It turns out that this
is very complex to program, and it will be at least
a few months
Vuescan (for windows) is putting my scan and crop tifs in the wrong
location. That is, in spite of me setting the default location for a
specific drive and directory, Vs is putting these tifs in the 'c:\vuescan'
directory. I don't know for sure, but it may be because I saved options in
the
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC
snip
It's there. Honest it is:
I have been unable to get my Sprintscan 4000 to
work with Microtech Firewire/scsi adapter. Have tried Winows 98se and Windows
2000. No joy. If anyone can help it would be great! Thank
you.
In a message dated 12/18/2001 11:44:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Vuescan use the same technique with infrared passes on all scanners,
Yes.
and therefore any difference between say an LS30 and FS4000 in the OEM
software are avoided.
The problem with the FS4000 is that there
seems that i was fooled by the Adobe RGB/Apple RGB bug.
Color spaces look like working ok now. Congratulations.
I tested various settings:
Result:
if i set for monitor space the most proximate match to my image in pshop,
then no matter what file space i choose, there is always a pretty good
Upon closer use of vuescan 7.3.6:
When BP is set to 0 or at 0.0001 i get unexpected RGB=0 values in my scans.
The complete border area of the negative stays at RGB=0, likeways some very
dark points in the image. Before i had always some non rgb=0 values in this
area when i wanted.
I have to use
For Vs users' comments and Ed's attention:
With respect to my earlier post, and trials with Vs v.7.3.6, attached are
2 images ... (1) the IR channel (2) the RGB. Both of them are in exact
registration, but I believe the IR is mis-registered with respect to the
defect. These scans have
This is the first time I've been able to sit down and play with Vs my
LS-2000 since early in v.7.
I'm scanning Supra 100 today ... and for Vuescan exposures I am getting
numbers like:
RGB = 3.33
IR = 4.57
It seems to me, for earlier versions of Vuescan, possibly as early as
v.6.x, I was
Hi list
I have a problem with this (newish) scanner. In almost everything
I've scanned so far I'm getting very patchy focus across the files.
I'm comparing the file sharpness with 35mm scans from my Nik LS200
and 120 scans from an old Minolta Dimage Scanmulti.
The problem appears to be the
In a message dated 12/19/2001 3:42:13 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can't speak or Vuescan focus, never tried that feature but SilverFast for
the Polaroid scanners does NOT allow you to pick a focus point.
VueScan doesn't allow you to pick a focus point either.
The SS120 seems to use a
Does the scanner allow control of the exposure for an individual scan?
To explain the question: suppose I have a very dense negative and detail
is lost unless there is more light allowed through it during the scan,
either by varying the brightness or the time.
I know there is an
You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run the
regsweep utilitity in the Utils folder of that versions download, then
install the new version after reboot.
--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
-Original Message-
The site http://www.nikontechusa.com says this is for Windows XP. Did you
find that it improved your Win2K version's performance?
thanks,
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc.
I'm thinking of getting the iCorrect software for Christmas. Does anyone
know whether I should get the stand-alone application or the Photoshop
plug-in version. (Yes, I have PS6.01)
Preston Earle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Grove
You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run
the regsweep utilitity in the Utils folder of that versions
download, then install the new version after reboot.
I made registry snapshots before and after installing NS
In a message dated 12/19/2001 6:05:00 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just started scanning some Kodachromes with the SS120, with
disastrous results. I had previously scanned them on an Epson 1640 (which
I was using before the SS120) with default settings and got satisfactory,
I made registry snapshots before and after installing NS version 3.12
with ConfigSafe Complete Recovery 4.0. Examination of the keys that NS
uses shows no compelling reason to do that with this version. As I'm
very likely the only person on this list who's written an entire book on
the NT
iCorrect Professional, the Photoshop plugin is probably the better option as
it provides more functionality than the iCorrect application, see:
http://www.picto.com/icorrect/iCorrectCompare.htm
BTW: you can (at least they tell me you can) get a discount (I think 10%) if
you insert a
So, does 3.1.2 run on Win98SE as well?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT
|
I have only downloaded the demo but I would certainly get the plug-in:
with the stand-alone you would have two procedures to do separately. With the plug-in
you can make any adjustments you want first (levels, contrast or whatever) if you
wish, run iCorrect as a filter, and then finish up
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:23:39 -0600 (CST) patton paul
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've also been looking at the
specs for the Nikon Coolscan IV and Minolta Dimage Scan Elite II. For
both these scanners, the dynamic range is calculated based on the A/D
conversion, which is 12 bits for the
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:49:25 -0800 Robert E. Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Many of the recent suggestions make me question the strategy behind =
Vuescan. This is certainly up to Ed Hamrick, but my long time =
understanding has been that the aim was to create a scanned image file =
that
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:07:13 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
a few months later I can state that PAN-F scans a lot better, with
respect
to the D-Max problems, with my new Canon FS4000 (and latest Vuescan
version).
That says something very positive about the
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:43:25 +0100 Alessandro Pardi
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
why is that? I mean, that conventional test target images don't work
properly with digital systems? I was just wondering why nobody had come
up
yet with MTF tests for scanners. Once you can print a MTF target
If you put in INTRODUCTION as the code you get to buy the non-Pro version
for $29.95. I just did. Don't be suckered into the extra $4.99 multiple
download fee in case your download fails. I was. Read the form carefully -
they pre-tick that box.
IB
At 23:48 19/12/01 +, you wrote:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian
D. Plikaytis
The site http://www.nikontechusa.com says this is for Windows
XP. Did you find that it improved your Win2K version's performance?
It's only been 24 hours since I installed NikonScan NS) 3.12 so there's
not enough mileage on it
Ron,
We have done some testing and know the
Microtech does NOT work reliability. The most compatible is the Adaptec but for
the PC I STRONGLY recommend you purchase a inexpensive SCSI card such as the
Adaptec 2906.
David
-Original
Message-
From: Ron Erter
[mailto:[EMAIL
At 04:06 PM 12/19/01, Ian Lyons wrote:
With Silverfast, the scans are so far off color-wise that it is
virtually impossible to correct, while with Insight, I was able to get
reasonably close with PS modifications.
Hmm, if SilverFast colour management is correctly configured you should
The clue might be that the one you are having trouble with has a huge amount of color shift. I don't know why that would keep any scanner software package from scanning the transparency so that it looked the same in Photoshop as the original.
I assume you know how to set up Silverfast correctly.
I also recommend the plug-in version. It supposedly is integrated with Photoshop's color management system.
If you buy the download version, make sure you decline the $5US charge that would allow you to make additional downloads if you needed to (such as might happen in a bad computer crash). The
Enoch
Thanks for the feedback...
Cheers...
SD
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 11/12/2001
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 7:23 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC
environments. Having worked at Microsoft for six years I know enough to
- Original Message -
From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:38 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT
You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run the
regsweep utilitity in
It seems I've been having problems with sending the #1 post ... most
likely my attached JPEG was too large. The previous included an example
which didn't show this artifact, accomplished with Nikonscan ... please take
my word ... you couldn't tell where the defect was ... I'll not include it
Generally I've avoided Photoshop plug-ins. I've tried to do things 'the
hard way' in order
to learn Photoshop. Correcting color casts and manipulating specific colors
are two
things I've found to be challenging using just Photoshop.
ICorrect has become a vital tool for me for assuring that the
My friend has a Nikon LS-20 and I'm wondering why she can't get the
whole frame to scan (the vertical dimension get clipped about 1/8 on
one side). This is with the standard Nikon software on a Mac G3.
Also, she is having focus problems so is there a secret to using the
manual focus
I am upgrading the NikonScan software for my LS2000 from version
2.5 to 3.1. I have firmware version 1.31.
Are there any special procedures/gotchas/tricks that I should be aware
of as I go about upgrading the S/W? I have Win98 SE.
Thanks very much,
Gaspar
46 matches
Mail list logo
