[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forTue 14 Oct, 2003

2003-10-15 Thread Arthur Entlich
I would suggest a different tact. The Epson 3200 probably will not help improve your postcard scans, since they simply don't have more than about 200 dpi resolution themselves, so you can be sure a 800 or 1600 dpi scanner has picked up whatever they can offer. Also, reflective work is much

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forTue 14 Oct, 2003

2003-10-15 Thread Arthur Entlich
I would consider things a little differently. My approach would be if you have a small number slides to be scanned then definitely consider using a service bureau of some sort to do it, because the slide scanner will set you back about $300, and the learning curve can be large. The cost per scan

[filmscanners] Re: wet mount adaptor for LS-8000

2003-10-15 Thread Arthur Entlich
In opened them in Photoshop. The first one is a TIFF the second ones are jpegs, as I recall. Art Nagaraj, Ramesh wrote: Are these TIFF files? How to open theM? Thanks Ramesh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Hadam Sent:

[filmscanners] Re: scanning TMAX 3200

2003-10-15 Thread KARL SCHULMEISTERS
I don't think the dynamic range of chromogenic BW is nearly as great as silver BW. Note that since both chromo and silver BW is film, it is 'wet darkroom' until the scanning stage. Its true that 'Zone System' includes the work done on the print itself, but the goal of Zone System printing is to

[filmscanners] Re: TMAX/grain/BWscanning/dynamic range

2003-10-15 Thread KARL SCHULMEISTERS
On BW film, doing my own 'speed test' of FP4 demonstrated a dynamic range of 11 stops of solid exposure range! Now I know paper won't render all of them, so this is where a good scanner does come into play. The gotcha with multiple exposure is that if the scene you are imaging has any dynamism

[filmscanners] Re: scanning TMAX 3200

2003-10-15 Thread Austin Smith
It's true that high quality silver-based BW film, when properly exposed and developed, has a higher dynamic range than chromogenic BW. It's also true that it is not a classic wet darkroom film, since it's normally developed by a one-hour type color lab. However, based on my experience with a

[filmscanners] Re: scanning TMAX 3200

2003-10-15 Thread KARL SCHULMEISTERS
Good point about the one hour type lab. I develop my own BW - though I know of 3 good labs in town to which I send most of the color work. One of them does excellent drum scans which I go to when I have an image I really want to get 'right'. Still saving up for my own Imacon. - Original

[filmscanners] Re: scanning TMAX 3200

2003-10-15 Thread Berry Ives
on 10/15/03 1:05 PM, Austin Smith at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's true that high quality silver-based BW film, when properly exposed and developed, has a higher dynamic range than chromogenic BW. It's also true that it is not a classic wet darkroom film, since it's normally developed by a