Both methods (printing and looking) are too subjective for my taste in
regard to this issue. I'd really like to see a objective map of the
changes. My personal sense is that jpeg is much better than most people
give it credit for.
It was designed with human vision in mind, so it does more
Bunch,
OK, the TB drive has been ordered, I'm almost ready to go. A few
more setting questions.
TIFF file type: The choices are 24, 48 and 64 bit RGBI. Which one
do I choose?
Use a Vuescan color balance preset, or set to none?
Thanks again for the help.
Carlisle
RGBI would make sense for raw, but I assume you are going do to light IR
cleanup.
I'd would use neutral. It compensates a bit for the dynamic range of the
film.
Personally, if I were to do what you are doing, i.e. batch scanning, I
would do it raw and RGBI TIFF. But if you just want to save RGB,
Carlisle Landel wrote:
Bunch,
Wow! The list lives!
Thanks to all for the advice.
Especiallly, thanks for the reminder that IR filtering doesn't work
for Kodachrome.
I've got the bulk slide feeder, so the plan is to simply drop a box
of slides in and start it up, then go away and drop
