nice
job on that image that you showed. I now have hope.
Thanks,
Jerry
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 00:00:02 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Sat 18 Oct, 2003
I have made a couple
of terrific medium format scans ) due to the whole who-knows-what
-Polaroid-is-going-be-doing issue.
Any thoughts from Nikon users,
or the future stability of Polaroid.
Thanks,
Jerry
From:
>> Michael Grecco
>> 310-452-4461
>> [EMAIL
soon.
Jerry
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:03 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Tue 14 Oct, 2003
>
>> o o o
>>
>> The BW CN films, why use them?
nner info. Not a threat I assure you.
Tony you are the best and I support you whatever you do.
Jerry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscri
sed on the honor system. I know
this is not for most the posters to this group. But maybe you know someone
who wants to get started.
Please reply directly if you are interested or know someone who is as I get
the digest and sometimes miss thin
>As I've suggested before, why don't you save the raw scan that has the
>detail (using NScan), and then color process it in Vuescan?
Hi Bob,
It's good to have that as a work-around, I just wanted to know what was
going on and why it was happening out of intellectual curio
turned up
>all the way).
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the info.
This particular slide wasn't Kodachrome, and the scanner did record the
deepest shadow detail, it's just that the color management didn't keep it.
I'll look into a cust
>
>Which version of Nikonscan? The CM was very broken in earlier versions...
Hi Tony,
It is version 3.1.2 of NikonScan.
Jerry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe f
e.
Thanks
Jerry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Didier,
I usually shoot both Portra NC 160 and VC 160, and have great results with
wet darkroom printing.
Does Portra VC 160 also scan well?
---
Jerry M. Pine
San Jose, CA
Photographs are made, not taken.
- Original Message -
From: "DRP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon
emove dust from
negatives I still get 3 to 30 dustspots on every scan. Perhaps our
living-room is too dust for filmscanning and the scanwit has acquired a fair
amount of dust internally.
BTW. Its not 2 and 2 and 4 pixels, but a lot more with my scanner.
Jerry
> -Original Message-
>
do with negatives:
scans are sharp, especially the spots, so you will have work to do.
Jerry
BTW. The 2740S may have a completely different type of CCD with much better
quality. My suggestion however is to test whatever scanner you buy with a
high-contrast negative film with a shot of large highlights and
nybody out there use other
> programs. Paint Shop Pro looks good, but doesn't handle 16-bit data. What
>
> about Ulead PhotoImpact, Corel Photo-Paint, Micrographix Picture
> Publisher,
> etc. ?
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] I use Picture Window Pro which has windows colo
> -Original Message-
> From: David Gordon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:21 PM
> To: Filmscanners
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Good neg stck on Scanwit
>
> Oostrom, Jerry [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Mon, 13 Aug
> 2001 15
umber
tranny films lately and they mentioned which films were contrasty and which
were less contrasty. This will ensure that the Scanwit will be able to scan
the shadows. Also tranny film will scan very smoothly compared to the grainy
appearance of negative film.
Jerry
> -Original Message
ED and the Coolscan 4000 ED, both
35mm scanners share the same lens, but the Coolscan 8000 which is a medium
format scanner does not. Not too surprising.
---
Jerry M. Pine
San Jose, CA
Photographs are made, not taken.
- Original Message -
From: "Jawed Ashraf" <[EMAIL PRO
v. PS 5.0 LE v. Jasc Paintshop Pro
> 7.02
>
>
> Picture Window Pro is another cheap photo editing program which you might
> consider in addition to PSP because it *does* support 16 bit editing.
>
> http://www.dl-c.com/
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] PWP uses the windows col
Sorry, I thought I had replied to him directly.
8-7
> -Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:30 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Stains and Grains (was Yellow St
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Tyson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Stains and Grains (was Yellow Stain)
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
> So if it's only occasiona
Thanks for your extensive research Frank!
BTW. I received your mail twice.
Could I ask you to try your photoshop correcting example with the BMW image
if it is not too much trouble?
Thanks Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Nichols [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday
r price.
>
> Jack Phipps
> Applied Science Fiction
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] Why? ... Who, you or he?
Jerry Oostrom
Acer Scanwit user.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 20
if it contains articles I am especially interested in.
Not that PP UK contains better tests, jut better photos printed on more
expensive paper, more tips and articles that don't spread over 20 pages
(continued here... continued there...).
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: R
contact you offlist,
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: Henk de Jong [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: ScanWit Yellow stain
>
> > Jerry, I'd suggest you find another p
Sorry Nikon, it was the the LS with the IV that had normal contrast and the
one with the 4000 that had high contrast. It was my memory that had no
contrast.
> -Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:53 PM
> T
Original Message-
> From: Arthur Entlich [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan + flat colors (that disappear with
> Mika
>
> Jerry,
>
> I think that the majority of any perce
LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
> But I've just read a review od the 4000ED in German magazine "digit"
> ftp://ftp.lasersoft.com.pl/SFPrasa2001/Digit_3-2001.pdf which says, that
> the
> true Dmax of this scanner is 2,3! It was even
erfix/toWebFlatbedquart.jpg 132k
(also PWP'd and saved at 100% jpg quality)
So is it user error, is it scanner error (bad lamp / bad CCD) or is it me
pushing the envelopes of what a decent scanner can do?
Thank you all for your interest, I've used you comments to make my point at
Acer NL,
Jerry
not write personal accusations on somebody's acts or more importantly
intentions etc. in public, even if they are true. (this is how I try to make
my mail less of a personal accusation is it working? 8-)
Saint Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikael Risedal [SMTP:[
I'll try your solution with the blank frame.
I once tried to insert a piece of blank frame into the calibration hole and
it made the whole scan stripy!
Thanks,
Jerry.
BTW. I Bcc'd Mr. Honda Lo, so that's why I included all of your mail.
> -Original Message-
>
n from negative
and on dark colored parts of a positive. Its ruining the wedding shots we
have taken from our family.
Thank you for your interest,
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:47 AM
> To:
I cable in aluminium foil, but it was to no avail. I'll try
one last thing this week: hook up the scanner on another group than the PC.
This is my last hope. I've seen the monitor flickering, so it could be that
the current or voltage is not stable enough in the group of the PC.
almost sc
out the Canon FS2710 and the
> > Acer is also in this price range.
> >
> > Photography is my hobby and I have slides going back many years.
> > I also take slides when I travel.
> >
> > What are your suggestions for a scanner to meet my needs?
> >
> > Jerry
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
t;
good luck to your problem with the scanner Alan,
I wouldn't mind seeing a few examples of scans with that problem from you,
so we can see if it is the same problem we are talking about.
Kind regards,
Jerry Oostrom
BTW. I think such symptoms could be solved by either replacing the CCD or
addi
start at $800.
Recently, I have seen messages about the Canon FS2710 and the
Acer is also in this price range.
Photography is my hobby and I have slides going back many years.
I also take slides when I travel.
What are your suggestions for a scanner to meet my needs?
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans
>
>
>
> Oostrom, Jerry wrote:
>
>
> > BTW. Lately I had sent in my scanner for service, and when I received it
> > back (problem
res
> scans"
> question I posted yesterday!
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
> Jerry, is the 675 ppi scan on the Acer Scanwit 2740S REALLY done in under
> 10
> seconds?
[Oostrom, Jerry] I don't know, I don't have one (I have a 2720S). If you
have the dust-removal enabled it w
e are some Epson
flatbeds that do a good job, and I recently saw an ad in Popular Photography
on a Canon flatbed that does 2400x4800ppi and I believe that was optical. I
don't think it is cheap though.
Jerry
Mike,
The 2000P Color Cartridge is also 5 color, but uses a pigment based ink,
while the 1270 uses a dye based ink.
---
Jerry M. Pine
Photographs are made, not taken.
- Original Message -
From: "Mystic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lynn Allen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Cleaning slides
>
>
> I hope that Honda Lo is still auditing this list. If not, Jerry, I'd
Beautiful reply with masterful selection of original text serves to prove
your and my point!
;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Noise correction alg
gt; repairs or replacement when a product doesn't meet functionality after
> minimal usage?
>
> To their everlasting credit, Acer *does* in fact replace, rather than
> repair, defective Scanwits with new ones. At least in the US, as I know
> firsthand.
[Oostrom, Jerry] I
I already asked this question to Ed and later to this list, all some time
ago. Ed replied that his algorithms were "of course" already doing such a
thing. Then I asked, where can you set the threshold on black (slides) or
white (negs) for what is considered to be dust and waited... (no answer to
t
ich [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s20
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> If these spots are in an area that can be isolated, and they are
> different enough fro
attention of Mr. Lo and Mr. Hamrick. Nice to have them
here.
Jerry.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canoscan 4000
>
>
> The
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Geraghty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s20
>
> "Oostrom, Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
le to damage the negs (very slight scratches), regardless of how
careful I am.
Jerry
BTW
Recently I have come up with a problem in several dias that if it would be
cured by ICE would certainly put the 2740s high on my list: black spots all
over the dia like filth-cristals. It was a Fuji Provia 100F
ar
>
> How many list members does it take to change a light bulb???
>
> Answer: 578.
>
> 1 to change the light bulb and post to the list that the light bulb has
> been changed.
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
> 27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different
This may be especially useful after aging of the scanner.
Thank you in advance for your thoughts and time,
Jerry Oostrom
For the interested ones a part of the mail discussion with Ed and an example
(if the list lets me send it) of a negative scan out of many scans in which
the error is shown: y
the next (to be done) preview.
I hope I made myself clear, it is hard to tell what I mean without showing
it.
Of course: I do not have the newest Vuescan version, but I know it is in the
6.7.x range.
Jerry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ezio [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday
late
522 Mbit as 522*1024*1024=522*1048,576=547,356,672 bits is 25,356,672 too
many. Luckily I was pointed to my error very soon.
> -----Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:57 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: f
)multiples of
powers of 1024.
Jerry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Paris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 3:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.5 Available
>
> 1kb = 1024. 857,211 / 1kb = 837.
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Horton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 7:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000>Vuescan>Grafics Program
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &
> other hand, Picture Window may have simply assumed sRGB ... assigned
> the profile without changing the data. Do you know how PW works??
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] With the Pro version that facilitates CM:
* You can specify a scanner profile for TWAIN input,
* you can specif
cal program that takes N files at arbitrary exposure levels
> and
> combines them into one "longpass" result. It accounts for charge bleeding
> and a number of other issues. The result has none of the gross errors
> that
> Vuescan currently shows and works far better.
[Oostrom,
s a flatbed and is
>
> > said to scan 1600x3200dpi)
>
> What does 1600x3200dpi mean? Does it scan at 1600 dpi along one dimension
> and 3200 dpi along the perpendicular dimension? I've also been puzzled by
> a similar claim on Epson's website. It gives a maximum pr
se settings the whole scene, but especially the
faces seem to have a magenta cast. How do you correct for this using levels
and curves without the scene getting too green? Can it be done, or should I
rescan using another film type setting or put color restore option off?
Thanks for your time,
Jerry
1:
From:
"Jonathan Sachs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Save Address - Block Sender
Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
"Jerry & Fiona Oostrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Save Address
Subject:
RE: A new problem with Picture
with that
setting. Anyway, I asked the creators of the package about this and until
now they responded to my previous questions with a free update of their
software!
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Berman [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 1:34 PM
>
buy images, I want to shoot them
myself, but you have inspired me (and my wife if I
show her you pictures). Your 'less is really more')
Jerry Oostrom
> -Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Julie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:54 PM
> To:
Just a question:
how do you remove an embedded color space from your large tiff file?
I have a color profiling capable software package, but it didn't allow me to
profile convert to color profile 'none'. It seemed it just didn't do any
conversion if you selected none. Without the conversion I ge
want to. If you change the
> brightness, it changes the output...changes in the life of the tube change
> the output. Unless you calibrate it TO something it has no idea what it
> is
> outputting. Every monitor is different too.
[Oostrom, Jerry] We once played a practical joke on one o
lbums,even carry succesfull snaps with
> you so you can recreate
> them whilst under pressure.
[Oostrom, Jerry] We usually go one day before the wedding to the scenes
where it is all about to take place and see the lighting for that time of
day on several spots etc. At night we look into e.g. we
Duh!
> -Original Message-
> From: shAf [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 6:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Fw: Color Profiles for Scanners
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] [znibh..]
> Not much of a point really.
g the shots we make.
Perhaps then they become worthy of the fuss related to scanning them etc.
Jerry (& Fiona)
OT mumbling:
We (Fiona and me) keep getting asked by our large family to shoot their
weddings, and while we have some success in persuading the few "richer" ones
to use pr
ver have edited in ProPhotoRGB but in a smaller gamut color
space or
* should have archived the 16-bit files instead (I am reluctant to do
this, I have a little crowded home)
Does anyone care to say something about the pros and cons of the three
approaches?
Thank you in advance,
even for readin
Thank you Tony Sleep for answering the questions.
Andrew Rodney also mailed a link to an article that itself links to another
article which confirmed my suspicions. (Thank you too, Andrew)
His link:
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/8582.html
The other linked article states IMP that a wide
color space) or are image files not coded in such way?
Thank you in advance,
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Fw: Co
nverting it to Adobe RGB isn't going to expand
> the gamut of the file. It's fixed after becoming sRGB. You can't increase
> the color gamut simply by converting into a space that can hold a larger
> number of colors.
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] I wonder about this, are th
http://www.nikon.co.uk/rangeele.htm
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikael Risedal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 9:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: New scanners from Nikon
>
>
> Nikon Coolscan IV ED, LS-40
> Nikon
[Oostrom, Jerry] I heard that with ftp sites (Ok whalemail isn't
one) you sometimes get a small (html) file telling you or containing a code
that should tell you there are too many simultaneous users.
Perhaps that is the reason that at times it didn't work for s
Am I the only one receiving this error:
File Not Found
The requested URL /base1.css was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 File Not Found error was encountered while trying to use
an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
?
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Geraghty [SMTP:[E
remove the
> dust spots. It doesn't result in any color shift, it works
> with Kodachrome, and it doesn't apply a softening filter
> in areas where there's no dust spot.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick
[Oostrom, Jerry] A ha, so Vuescan cleaning still uses the in
of the pixels in the previous larger
image for each pixel in the new image?
It more or less explains why I have some grainy images that retain a lot of
their graininess when downsampled. But why is downsampling often called
better than downsizing?
Thank you all in advance,
Jerry
> -Origi
servation Institute:
>
>
> But basically, while testing is still being done, the following generally
> hold true;
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] [snip: look into archives to find this long mail]
Some quick answers from my memory below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Tyson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: cd storage
>
> Dear Jerry,
>
> It would be
's a general magazine for consumer
products.
Jerry Oostrom
http://home.wanadoo.nl/joostrom
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Geraghty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: cd storage
Weird, I thought I did this myself intentionally in the threads that I
started, but considering the way my memory works that could or could as well
not have been true...
perhaps it is time to go on celebrate weekend!
Sorry...
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sume some extra bandwidth by sending this
reply to the filmscanner list i.s.o. you. I do this because I also like to
signal, just like many others have done, that I don't like to have so many
off-topic threads.
Have a nice weekend,
Jerry
BTW.
All my filmscanner mail is redirected to one
pecially the pants, compare them to dark
parts in the other scans).
http://home.wish.net/~jerfi/prisonandme.jpg
Thanks in advance for your time and insight.
Jerry Oostrom
http://home.wanadoo.nl/joostrom
> -Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sen
Sorry, the scans will have to come later (begin of next week), something
came in between...
> -Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 8:19 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: filmscanne
e scan by adding noise when using the
> b/w
> NEG settings of the scanner application, while possible registering as an
> overall purple cast when scanned with a color setting.
>
[Oostrom, Jerry] This is why I wondered whether the outcome of the
b/w scan with color setting shou
> That's great to hear.
> Someone with some positive feedback for a change!
[Oostrom, Jerry] I am happy too though, I am just focusing on the few
problems I still have at this time. Anyway, I am veeer happy for the
money I spent on this scanner. I also have enlarged prints (4xA4)
the squares on this page
(http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Usingmira.htm), which is btw. a page of
someone on this list, who has been so smart/well-mannered/ethical not to
join in this thread.
Thank you again for all information on XP2,
Jerry.
> -Original Message-
> From: L
People of the list,
Thank you for your on-list and off-list replies. You know, it's not that my
images are really worth the fuss, but it is the feeling that counts for me
that I retain most of the original info and hopefully quality in my image
edits.
Thank you,
Jerry.
softer grain # softer grain
If the scans should look black and white the generic color negative setting
is i.m.o. preferable to the black and white Ilford XP2 setting of vuescan.
Now I just need to test Miraphoto for my scanwit with these settings.
Thanks in advance.
Jerry O
resampling,
then go from 16 bit / pixel to 8 bit / pixel.
2. Go from 16 bit / pixel to 8 bit / pixel, then downsize an image (w.r.t.
number of pixels) using bicubic resampling.
Many, many many thanks for any answer to the last question!
> -Original Message-
> From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:
ust wondered if the
difference is still if at all visible in jpegs. Perhaps it is only visible
when you are upsizing?
(Oh oh that's two questions! I'll leave it at that)
Thanks in advance.
Jerry Oostrom
homepage: http://home.wanadoo.nl/joostrom with some Scanwit scans
http://community
Hello to the scanning community you folks are great and I have been getting
a lot of good info-thanks,
I have been doing most of my scans through an outside lab (?), but a local
magazine went bankrupt and since my chance of collecting any money ($200 US)
was minimal they gave me a Polaroid Sprint
re in BruceRGB even though the profile is not embedded.
Have a nice weekend,
Jerry
http://home.wanadoo.nl/joostrom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
,
Jerry
NB
There was another (more general and most useful, imo worth repeating) tip
from Alan Womack, not per se related to Scanwit, vuescan or filmholder
positioning:
- There is no need to reboot the PC to let the SCSI card see the filmscanner
if you turned the filmscanner on after your PC, just
point), but in my older version of
Linux there was no support for a CMS that uses these embedded profiles.
Jerry
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Armstrong [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 3:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Embe
n does the intensity calibration take place (at power-on of the scanner /
at start of a scan (strip) session)?
Any suggestions what I can do about the problem?
Thanks in advance,
Jerry.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 18
92 matches
Mail list logo
