The current version of Vuescan is v7.6.61. It provides for histograms of
both the Preview scan and the record scan. That's what the Preview Hist.
and Scan Hist. tabs are.
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
of the discussion appears to
involve Vuescan since that is what many of his fellow debaters are using.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Austin Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: 24bit vs more
Hi Laurie,
Given the new information, I would say that Austin needs to update his
familiarity with VueScan as well since much of the discussion appears to
involve Vuescan since that is what many of his fellow debaters are using.
You are correct that I (and apparently you as well ;-) weren't
You're not alone. I didn't check them until this question came up. I
actually thought that Preview Hist. was a log of some kind ;-0
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
I didn't write any of this, nor was I even quoted in any of the
exchange. A bit of prejudicial assumption on your part, perhaps?
As you will note from your own email software, these quotes were written
by Austin.
I also do not use Vuescan, but I have not made any comments about it
relative to
Austin Franklin writes:
I have little experience with Viewscan,
No experience at all I think. Austin doesn't know how to spell the name
right...
--
Henk de Jong
http://www.hsdejong.nl/
Nepal and Burma (Myanmar) - Photo Galleries
Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't write any of this, nor was I even quoted in any of the
exchange. A bit of prejudicial assumption on your part, perhaps?
No, no. Just me being dizzy and too hasty. Abject apologies.
I also do not use Vuescan, but I have not made any comments
Austin Franklin wrote:
How does the color calibration in
VS work? To close the calibration loop,
you really need to take a picture of a
known target and do so for each
film/development/camera and/or
lense (as different lenses render colors
differently) etc., and even then there
may be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: 24bit vs more
I didn't write any of this, nor was I even quoted in any of
the exchange
Austin,
From what I remember Ed Hamrick saying, he uses Kodak calibration data on
film types.
Bob Frost.
Hi Bob,
From my experience, I've found that to be rather inaccurate...as I've said,
development and exposure play a big part on tonality.
Regards,
Austin
Henk,
Austin Franklin writes:
I have little experience with Viewscan,
No experience at all I think. Austin doesn't know how to spell the name
right...
My spelling of it is in fact correct. If you want to fuss about
capitalization of the S, fine, but if you look through my posts, you will
Henk,
I have little experience with Viewscan,
No experience at all I think. Austin doesn't know how to spell the name
right...
I sit corrected, this product that we are discussing is spelled VUEScan!
Which, of course, has no bearing on much of anything...and my misspelling is
all you seem
compressed, medium quality)
to 95 (not compressed very much, high quality).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more
Hi
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
I just checked my copy of VueScan
...It does not present a visual histogram
of the scanned image...
I guess you are using a pretty old version of Vuescan, Laurie?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Austin Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more
Hi David,
But do you scan negative films as
positive and invert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Austin Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more
Henk,
Austin Franklin writes:
I have little experience
Frank,
But they don't need being picked on. You do.
You're supposed to be an adult. Why not behave like one, especially in
public? This is a technical forum, and I believe that most everyone here
would appreciate it if you kept your personal issues out of this forum.
Austin
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter
Marquis-Kyle
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: 24bit vs more
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
I just checked my copy of VueScan
...It does not present
Delurk
Its the Preview Hist and Scan Hist tabs at the top of the right hand panel.
/Delurk
At 11:31 PM 9/17/2003, LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
I would welcome any suggestins
as to the location of the comand that produces a visual histogram.
--
Clive
http://clive.moss.net
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying this applies when using Vuescan - especially with negs?
That is probably how every filmscanner that you or I would
use, works... The issue is the software (and possibly hardware), and
how it allows you to control this...but if you can get
Hi Rob,
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying this applies when using Vuescan - especially with negs?
That is probably how every filmscanner that you or I would
use, works... The issue is the software (and possibly hardware), and
how it allows you to control this...but
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Austin Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more
Hi Rob,
Well, I've been around since long before Viewscan...and IMO
Frank,
By low end scanners, do you mean something like the Polaroid SS4000?
Because VueScan produces much better scans than Polacolor Insight.
Viewscan, nor Insight, nor any scanner software produces the scans, the
scanner and the scanner operator does. Perhaps it's true that for someone
who
It is with the Nikon 4000. Vuescan simply saves it as an extra channel if
you ask it to. You can then look at it and see what it has marked for
removal.
Bob Frost.
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IR data is simply a fourth channel, and could
easily be
Thanks for that info Bob. Does the Nikon 4000 suffer from any focus
issues, at least in your experience (assuming you have one)?
BTW, do you think the IR dust removal works well? It seems to me that it's
(dust problem) exacerbated on scanners that use point light sources, like
LEDs... I've
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Austin Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 24bit vs more
Frank,
By low end scanners, do you mean something like
Frank,
Perhaps it's true that for someone who wants the software to
simply hand then a scan, Viewscan does a better job at
automating the process.
And I presume you think this is me? How condescending.
Frank, did I say that was you? No, I didn't. Don't read things into what I
say that
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have little experience with Viewscan,
FWIW, Arthur, your cheapshots against Vuescan are really stupid; you don't
know what you are talking about. It's a powerful, flexible, scanner driver.
It's not about automation at all. The software provided with
Hi David,
The last I checked, Vuescan doesn't have a curves tool, although it's high
on the author's list of things to add. What it does have support for is
color calibration.
Some of the scanner software has film profiling, and I've done quite a bit
of work with it, unfortunately, that only
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last I checked, Vuescan doesn't have a curves tool, although it's high
on the author's list of things to add. What it does have support for is
color calibration.
Some of the scanner software has film profiling, and I've done quite a bit
of work
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should either get raw data from the scanner, or do the setpoints/tonal
curves correctly in the scanner software. Keep in mind, every time you
re-do setpoints/tonal curves, you are degrading the data. It's just a
fact
of how setpoints/tonal curves
Hi Rob,
I dispute the claim that
if you have
to do a significant amount of adjustment after scanning that you haven't
done it right. It depends on the circumstances.
Hum. Obviously, I disagree, and note, it's not just after scanning but
after scanning and letting the scanner do setpoints
32 matches
Mail list logo
