Steve Greenbank wrote:
The music CDs were just one part of the examples. Some of the later music
CD's are MP3 discs that are standard ISO data discs. I don't think I have
ever used a RW for an Audio CD. Also the examples of saving data to transfer
from one computer to another is again
Message -
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD from Scanner
| Steve wrote:
|
| Most of the information I have seenis via http://www.cdmediaworld.com
| and
| links from there. My own personal experience
somebody in Yukon Territory discovered a lode.
--LRA
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD from Scanner
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 04:23:21 -0700
Lynn Allen wrote:
Out of 20 Kodak Gold CD-Rs distributed, I've had
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD from Scanner
Steve Greenbank wrote:
The music CDs were just one part of the examples. Some of the later
music
CD's are MP3 discs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to express my deepest thanks to all those who provided me
with
such helpful information. You have saved me probably weeks of
frustration.
Hopefully I will now only have hours of frustration figuring out how
to
implement your suggestions g.
Steve Greenbank wrote:
Most of the information I have seenis via http://www.cdmediaworld.com and
links from there. My own personal experience is that CD-RW is more
temperamental.
Steve
Thank you and others for the links. I will read them, and try to decide
if CD-RW should continue
Steve wrote:
Most of the information I have seenis via http://www.cdmediaworld.com
and
links from there. My own personal experience is that CD-RW is more
temperamental.
I haven't seen that to be the case, but then my experience is limited to
only a few 10-packs of CD-RW. I've yet to
I wrote:
My own personal experience is that CD-RW is more
temperamental.
Since a few people have commented on this I think I should give a little
more detail.
I have extensively used CD-R even some dodgy cheap brands in my car 10
CD-stack. These discs are exposed to temperatures from
]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD from Scanner
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:08:55 +0100
I wrote:
My own personal experience is that CD-RW is more
temperamental.
Since a few people have commented on this I think I should give a little
more
Your first paragraph refers to CD-RWs, but your second says CD-Rs. Have you
used both or just the Kodak CD-Rs?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD from Scanner
| Steve
: filmscanners: CD from Scanner
Hi, Steve--
I get from your post that you're recording a lot of music CDs. This, I
think, is a little different from data CDs (even photo CDs), in that music
CDs are *extremely* time-sensitive, while data CDs are not. Having the
fastest possible CD burner
It's best generally to use CD-R as they are generally more reliable than CD-RW and
they are cheaper too.
Can you supply me with any references for this statement, in terms of
reliability?
This concerns me since I use CD-RW for most of my CD file storage.
Art
Dear Burt,
Dell is being more honest with you than the companies that make and sell
CD-R burners.
Basically, if you are burning a regular CD-R (and not one preformatted
as
a Direct CD, which BTW, don't work that well either) you should not
expect to be able to burn from any source that is slow
At 20:43 10-07-01 -0700, you wrote:
It's best generally to use CD-R as they are generally more reliable
than CD-RW and they are cheaper too.
Can you supply me with any references for this statement, in terms of
reliability?
This concerns me since I use CD-RW for most of my CD file storage.
I would like to express my deepest thanks to all those who provided me with
such helpful information. You have saved me probably weeks of frustration.
Hopefully I will now only have hours of frustration figuring out how to
implement your suggestions g.
Burt
I am just starting to get into digital imaging. Computers to me are not
intuitive (to put it mildly) and I am not being modest.
I am trying to create CDs from images on my flatbed scanner (Epson 1200U) to
the CD. I follow the steps but I am unable to read the result. I have a
Dell computer
Are you actually expecting to scan to a folder on a CD that you haven't
burned yet? It sounds like what you're expecting to do.
Scan and output as a NON compressed file format, like TIF or PSD (Photoshop
file). Scan at a ppi that is larger than your expected usage of the images.
Save the
Burt: Though I do not have a Dell I do have the same software. I have
found that the CD writer software woorks a lot better if you go through
the workflow the Dell rep. suggested. It may be cumbersome but it does
work best. I have usually done some cleaning and sharpening and
sometimes
I have to agree with the Dell Tech. What I would suggest is
to create a folder on the hard drive special for the CD burning process,
and dump the scans to it. Then you can do all of them in an uninterrupted
sequence, and when it is done, and the CD is checked, you just erase
everything ion that
Burt wrote:
What I was told is that the Adaptec does not do well copying
from the scanner and that my best procedure with the Adaptec
software was to copy to the hard drive and then copy to the
CD. It was also suggested that I might acquire another CD
burner software that would do a better
20 matches
Mail list logo
