Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-13 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: Also because it's a dead end -- no longer supported or updated. While I can see why that might be an issue, am I the only one who sees irony that on a list where the complaints about annual upgrade fees of Finale is constantly complained about, the opposite is also

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-13 Thread Neal Gittleman
I'm a WordPerfect die-hard who switched to Word about a year ago when I got a new computer and got tired of having to use MacLinkPlus to translate every file I sent anyone. Here's my 2-cents. I recently upgraded from 10.3.something to 10.4.1. WordPerfect 3.5e, the last version that existed

[Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread ThomaStudios
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board. What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X. I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly refuses to create a printer on my system. All the other Office components will

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Pages, part of iWork. Great word processing program. ThomaStudios wrote: Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board. What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X. I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly refuses to

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
Pages is great, and inexpensive, but it definitely takes some getting used to. It helps if you're familiar with InDesign, Quark, etc, since Pages is actually more of a baby desktop publishing app than a traditional word processor. It's especially good for mixing text and images. - Darcy

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Christopher Smith
On Jun 12, 2005, at 4:15 PM, ThomaStudios wrote: Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board. What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X. I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly refuses to create a printer on my

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread ThomaStudios
Thanks Darcy (and the others who chimed in). I actually didn't know about Pages, but will check it out. You also brought up InDesign, which I own vCS2. I didn't even give that a thought. Ah, there's hope for me yet! Thanks again to all who responded. J.D. Thomas ThomaStudios

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread dhbailey
ThomaStudios wrote: Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board. What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X. I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly refuses to create a printer on my system. All the other Office

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread ThomaStudios
I did some superficial research on this, and about I could find out was that they haven't updated anything for the Mac in about 3 years or so. *** J.D. Thomas ThomaStudios West Linn OR www.thomastudios.com *** On Jun 12, 2005, at 2:33 PM,

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
As you probably gathered, WordPerfect for Mac was discontinued ages ago. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 12 Jun 2005, at 6:39 PM, ThomaStudios wrote: I did some superficial research on this, and about I could find out was that they haven't updated anything for the Mac in

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jun 2005 at 15:39, ThomaStudios wrote: I did some superficial research on this, and about I could find out was that they haven't updated anything for the Mac in about 3 years or so. If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem? I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Cause it doesn't run under OS X, it runs under OS 9. David W. Fenton wrote: If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem? I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running Word2K or Word2K2, of which I have legal copies. Word97 is sufficient for my needs. If the 3-year-old

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Darcy James Argue
Also because it's a dead end -- no longer supported or updated. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 12 Jun 2005, at 7:09 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Cause it doesn't run under OS X, it runs under OS 9. David W. Fenton wrote: If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem? I

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Jun 2005 at 16:09, Eric Dannewitz wrote: David W. Fenton wrote: If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem? I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running Word2K or Word2K2, of which I have legal copies. Word97 is sufficient for my needs. If the 3-year-old

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Well, that too. Darcy James Argue wrote: Also because it's a dead end -- no longer supported or updated. - Darcy ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Eric Dannewitz
I wasn't the one looking, but it does run under OS 9 Classic, but it's really not worth the effort. One could get Pages, or even a copy of Office for OS X, or even Appleworks I don't think Wordperfect for the Mac has been updated in 5 or more years. The last release was 3.5 I believe, and it

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread John Howell
At 1:15 PM -0700 6/12/05, ThomaStudios wrote: Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board. What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X. I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly refuses to create a printer on my

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Have you done the usual things, such as Repair Disk Permissions, and seen if there are any updates to Word that you should install? John Howell wrote: Our computers came with MS Office preloaded, so most of us use MS Word. (The university upgrades us about every 4 years.) The version I now

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Ken Durling
WP updates have not been all that significant to the word processor segment. Most of it has been bells and whistle, spreadsheets, and web features that personally I never use. I used WP 5.1 for years, and then got WpWin 8 and have been using that for a long time. There were some minor

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread Ken Durling
PS If you do a lot of file sharing, I suppose the one area not being up-to-date that could be an issue is the converters. But if it's mostly in-house I wouldn't worry. You can always use text files. Ken At 04:50 PM 6/12/2005, you wrote: WP updates have not been all that significant to the

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread laloba2
Hi J.D., There is another nice word processor program called Mariner Write that a lot of people seem to like. It works in Tiger too and you can download it and try it first. It will read Word documents and save to RTF-Word files. It runs about $50.00-60.00 depending on whether you buy a

Re: [Finale] OT - Word processors for OS X

2005-06-12 Thread ThomaStudios
Thanks Karen. I'll check that out as well. *** J.D. Thomas ThomaStudios West Linn OR www.thomastudios.com *** On Jun 12, 2005, at 5:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi J.D., There is another nice word processor program called Mariner Write

[Finale] OT: %$@*!! Word

2005-03-22 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hi all, This is something that's been bothering me for a long time, and I thought I'd ask the list if there's any solution: How do I PERMANENTLY get rid of the damn Adobe Acrobat PDF Maker Toolbar in Word (v11.1 for Mac OS X)? If I go to Tools - Customize - Customize Toolbars Menus, I can

Re: [Finale] OT: %$@*!! Word

2005-03-22 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:51:12 -0500, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never asked for this toolbar in the first place, and I can't seem to figure out how to banish it. Found at: http://macobserver.com/columns/rantsandraves/2004/20040709.shtml You can remove it (from Office 2004) by

Re: [Finale] OT: %$@*!! Word

2005-03-22 Thread Carlberg Jones
At 4:01 PM -0800 3/22/05, Brad Beyenhof wrote: You can remove it (from Office 2004) by deleting the following files: Easy to do and it works! Thanks. Shortcut - copy the file name at the end of each file reference - just copy PDFMaker.xla from /Applications/Microsoft Office

Re: [Finale] OT: %$@*!! Word

2005-03-22 Thread Darcy James Argue
Thanks, Brad. I owe you one. (I shoulda asked years ago!) - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 22 Mar 2005, at 7:01 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:51:12 -0500, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never asked for this toolbar in the first place, and I can't

Re: [Finale] OT: %$@*!! Word

2005-03-22 Thread Brad Beyenhof
Eh, you just owe me for the five minutes it took me to refine my Google search to 'remove PDF Maker toolbar os-x'. By the way, that search incorporated my two favorite little-known Google tricks (this thread is OT, so I can talk about whatever I want! :-P): 1. Adding a hyphen between terms (as