http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/holes/story/0,10801,104504,00.html?source=NLT_AMnid=104504
Phil Daley AutoDesk
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On 9 Sep 2005 at 12:49, Phil Daley wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/holes/story/0,10
801,104504,00.html?source=NLT_AMnid=104504
Firefox is still a safer, more secure browser than Internet Explorer.
Compare the Secunia pages for IE6.x and Firefox:
IE6.x
Am 15.05.2005 um 08:11 schrieb Dennis Bathory-Kitsz:
Buy.com has been fine for me. Some sites load background hit counters
and
advertising tracking stuff that hold up page loads if you have popups
suppressed (I do). And my (tech) publisher has required online billing,
using IE-only code. Keeping
At 10:38 AM -0400 5/15/05, Andrew Stiller wrote:
This *was* the OSX version, and it behaved as described.
I don't doubt that Andrew, but it didn't happen for me.
I usually use IE, Safari and OmniWeb, but I thought I would try
Firefox after seeing your message.
I downloaded the latest version to
Andrew,
Check which version of Firefox you downloaded. If you are using an OS 9x
version that requires a reboot, you would do well to download the OSX
version. It is dependable and very fast.
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On the strength of recommendations from this list, I
On May 15, 2005, at 6:20 AM, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
Andrew,
Check which version of Firefox you downloaded. If you are using an OS
9x
version that requires a reboot, you would do well to download the OSX
version. It is dependable and very fast.
This *was* the OSX version, and it behaved as
At 10:35 AM 05/15/2005, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Windows were *glacially* slow to load. As for the possibility that
these problems might have been remotely based--well, let's just say I
don't believe in coincidences.
Do you by chance use a proxy server? I have noticed that Firefox on Windows
loads
At 10:35 AM 5/15/05 -0400, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Windows were *glacially* slow to load. As for the possibility that
these problems might have been remotely based--well, let's just say I
don't believe in coincidences. I get a new browser, take it for a test
run to a site I've visited many times
On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:38:58 -0400, Andrew Stiller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On May 15, 2005, at 6:20 AM, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
Andrew,
Check which version of Firefox you downloaded. If you are using an OS
9x
version that requires a reboot, you would do well to download the OSX
On 15 May 2005 at 10:35, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On May 14, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Andrew, what was the problem with the Buy.com site? Were windows
just slow to load? Or did something not work? Firefox is so small
and efficient that I have trouble believing it could have
On 15 May 2005 at 11:11, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 10:35 AM 5/15/05 -0400, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Windows were *glacially* slow to load. As for the possibility that
these problems might have been remotely based--well, let's just say I
don't believe in coincidences. I get a new browser,
Phil Daley wrote:
Firefox suffers 'extremely critical' security hole
Security researchers say exploit code is already circulating online
News Story by Matthew Broersma
MAY 09, 2005 (TECHWORLD.COM) - Firefox has two unpatched security holes
that could allow an attacker to take control of a
On the strength of recommendations from this list, I recently
downloaded Firefox because I have been so aggravated by the slowness of
other browsers (IE, Safari) in OSX. Firefox, however, turned out to be
the worst of all: it took me *40 minutes* to do a simple
toner-cartridge order via
At 8:42 PM -0400 5/14/05, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Can anyone recommend a browser that performs w. similar speed and
reliability under OSX, or is this yet another area where OSX is
demonstrably inferior to its predecessor?
Netscape 7.2 works fine in OS 10.3.7. I must use it to access two of my
I am not a Maciac, but it seems very unlikely that a browser would be the
limiting factor in making an order from a website. Far more likely to affect
speed are intervening web traffic or server loads.
Richard Yates
On the strength of recommendations from this list, I recently
downloaded
Richard Yates / 2005/05/14 / 08:51 PM wrote:
I am not a Maciac, but it seems very unlikely that a browser would be the
limiting factor in making an order from a website. Far more likely to affect
speed are intervening web traffic or server loads.
Ordering at BH Photo, Check Out button doesn't
On May 14, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Carlberg Jones wrote:
At 8:42 PM -0400 5/14/05, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Can anyone recommend a browser that performs w. similar speed and
reliability under OSX, or is this yet another area where OSX is
demonstrably inferior to its predecessor?
Netscape 7.2 works fine in
Firefox suffers 'extremely critical' security hole
Security researchers say exploit code is already circulating online
News Story by Matthew Broersma
MAY 09, 2005 (TECHWORLD.COM) - Firefox has two unpatched security holes
that could allow an attacker to take control of a user's computer system,
On 9 May 2005 at 12:53, Phil Daley wrote:
Firefox suffers 'extremely critical' security hole
Security researchers say exploit code is already circulating online
News Story by Matthew Broersma
MAY 09, 2005 (TECHWORLD.COM) - Firefox has two unpatched security
holes that could allow an
19 matches
Mail list logo
