I do see the notation (1,3) in choral music. Not often, and maybe it's
dependent on the publishing house. While it's reasonably clear, for the
environment of a church choir setting, where sight-reading can unfortunately
become the norm, I find this confusing. I once had to read through an
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 22 Mar 2010 at 17:11, dhbailey wrote:
Perhaps if you were to explain more fully the road map for
the work in question, we could offer better insight to help
you make the music the clearest.
Maybe it's my early music background, but for one particular
situation, I
At 9:33 PM +0100 3/22/10, dc wrote:
I have a piece with three endings, where 1 3 are identical. Is it
kosher to put them both under the same bracket, say, with
1. 3.
and then
2.
Thanks,
Dennis
I would say not, unless what follows 3 is exactly what follows 1.
The purpose of multiple
cents
McGowan
-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
John Howell
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 5:53 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] repeats and endings
At 9:33 PM +0100 3/22/10, dc wrote:
I have a piece with three endings
Mike McGowan wrote:
Many of the old marches (certainly the ragtime marches) used an unusual
repeat system: the first strain has a first ending, second ending which
moves to the 2nd strain, and a fine' ending. After the third strain, one
will D.S. back to the first strain and take the fine'
No.
(IMO.)
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 22 Mar 2010, at 4:33 PM, dc wrote:
I have a piece with three endings, where 1 3 are identical. Is it kosher to
put them both under the same bracket, say, with
1. 3.
and then
2.
Thanks,
Dennis
Oooo...
I don't think so. While I have given multiple numbers to endings
before, it is very strange to have the FIRST box be the last box, and
have to skip over material to go on.
Now, if there is a FINE at the end of the 3rd ending, I would do it,
but not otherwise. In fact, I wouldn't
dc wrote:
I have a piece with three endings, where 1 3 are identical. Is it
kosher to put them both under the same bracket, say, with
1. 3.
and then
2.
Depends upon the context. I've seen it done this way in brass band parts
produced in an era when labor and paper were expensive, but
dc wrote:
I have a piece with three endings, where 1 3 are identical. Is it
kosher to put them both under the same bracket, say, with
1. 3.
and then
2.
Thanks,
I've seen it done, but I do agree with Darcy that the answer
should be no.
The main reason is that the road map issues can
On 22 Mar 2010 at 17:11, dhbailey wrote:
Perhaps if you were to explain more fully the road map for
the work in question, we could offer better insight to help
you make the music the clearest.
Maybe it's my early music background, but for one particular
situation, I see no issue with it,
David W. Fenton wrote:
Maybe it's my early music background, but for one particular
situation, I see no issue with it, and that's an ABA where the 2nd
ending starts the B section, and 1st ending is the FINE for the
repeat of the A section. I just don't see how that's confusing at
all. Then
On 22 Mar 2010 at 23:22, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
Maybe it's my early music background, but for one particular
situation, I see no issue with it, and that's an ABA where the 2nd
ending starts the B section, and 1st ending is the FINE for the
repeat of the A
12 matches
Mail list logo
