Remember this?
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:29:04 +0100
From: Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O.K. for David, Mark Joel (+ any lurkers) here goes.
Remember this his a list from a little way back (actually, I did post it
on the
At 7/13/2005 09:03 PM, Ken Durling wrote:
Sorry, Phil. I overreacted because it was so old as to defy relevance in
my eyes. But of course I know the program. I'm sure it's interesting and
relevant to someone who hasn't been tracking its progress.. See the
response on this list from Daniel
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks like
it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it has at this
point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed, things that
haven't and things that display an ignorance of how Sibelius works. Did
At 7/13/2005 09:49 AM, Ken Durling wrote:
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks like
it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it has at this
point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed, things that
haven't and things that display
On 13 Jul 2005 at 6:49, Ken Durling wrote:
I don't have time to go over this point by point, but this list looks
like it was from version 1.4. I'm really not sure what relevance it
has at this point. But at a glance I see things that have been fixed,
things that haven't and things that
Well, I, for one, would like to see a point-by-point response to each
of the items. Maybe somebody could do something like:
David -
I forwarded the list to someone at Sibelius as I had to work all day
today. here's a point-by-point response from the source:
Hi Ken,
Thanks for
Sorry, Phil. I overreacted because it was so old as to defy relevance in
my eyes. But of course I know the program. I'm sure it's interesting and
relevant to someone who hasn't been tracking its progress.. See the
response on this list from Daniel at Sibelius, to whom I forwarded your
Thanks, Ken, for posting this -- I definitely appreciate it.
On 13 Jul 2005 at 17:33, Ken Durling wrote (quoting two other people):
34. Speed users will find that you are constantly grabbing the wrong
items as the application is so slow to react.
The responsiveness of the program is, in
At 06:40 PM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
Do people with more modern Windows PCs find the same comparative
difference between Sibelius 3 and 4? Or is there some odd
incompatibility with the graphics subsystem on my PC?
David -
I have two PCs, one a modern fast (3.2Ghz) laptop, and a slower (866Mhz)
On 13 Jul 2005 at 20:00, Ken Durling wrote:
At 06:40 PM 7/13/2005, you wrote:
Do people with more modern Windows PCs find the same comparative
difference between Sibelius 3 and 4? Or is there some odd
incompatibility with the graphics subsystem on my PC?
I have two PCs, one a modern fast
10 matches
Mail list logo
