I hear what you're saying...and sometimes a local solution is the
best and only way to go in a pinch. But on the other hand, there's
something about a score with a number of different spacing algorithms
that doesn't look quite right to me. As I understand it, the old
engravers of
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Eric Fiedler wrote:
I hear what you're saying...and sometimes a local solution is the
best and only way to go in a pinch. But on the other hand, there's
something about a score with a number of different spacing
algorithms that doesn't look quite right to me.
On Mon Jan 25, at MondayJan 25 1:16 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
(For one thing, 75% of desktop publishers shouldn't be allowed to
have more than eight typefaces)
Eight? What are the other seven?
8-)
Christopher
___
Finale mailing list
On 25 Jan 2010 at 11:44, Eric Fiedler wrote:
I hear what you're saying...and sometimes a local solution is the
best and only way to go in a pinch. But on the other hand, there's
something about a score with a number of different spacing algorithms
that doesn't look quite right to me. As
On Mon Jan 25, at MondayJan 25 2:25 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
One computer approach might be to use a multi-pass approach, i.e., do
a default spacing, then look at it a second time to see if there are
any suspicious things that need to be fixed. I'm not sure how easy it
is to examine the
On 25 Jan 2010 at 14:36, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Mon Jan 25, at MondayJan 25 2:25 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
One computer approach might be to use a multi-pass approach, i.e., do
a default spacing, then look at it a second time to see if there are
any suspicious things that need to
Eric Fiedler wrote:
As I understand it, the old engravers of
yesteryear used one set of spacings for a whole piece or movement, which
_did_ require a lot of calculations before hammering in the first note
punch, but which produced results which are easy to read and in addition
exude a
David W. Fenton wrote:
On the other hand, there are some things that I think a plugin should
do. For instance, I wish there were some way to use the beat charts
that would not require moving all the handles. ...
The UI on beat chart editing is just awful. I don't mind moving the beat
Matthew Hindson (gmail) wrote:
In the linked image:
http://imgur.com/Aux4V.png
you will notice the bad spacing between notes 2 and 3. Apart from
manually adjusting the third or second notes using the appropriate
Special Tool, the normal Music Spacing options have no effect.
Has anyone
Happens all the time with us (FinMac 2010).
We generally solve the problem either by
(a) using the Special tools note mover (a royal PITA), or
(b) making the measure (or _all_ measures) a little wider using the
Measure Tool or Spacing Tool, or
(c) changing the Note Spacing values globally
It
Eric Fiedler wrote:
(c) changing the Note Spacing values globally
Why not locally? Note spacing settings are only applied when respacing
is done and if you turn off AMS you'll have full control over the
spacing of the document.
It's easy to build a few FinaleScripts to provide spacing for
Matthew Hindson (gmail) écrit:
Has anyone else run into this?
Avoid collision of notes and accidentals is checked in the
Music Spacing
options.
The spacing is being applied to this particular part only, i.e.
there are
no other staves affecting the spacing. The other bars in the
part
12 matches
Mail list logo
