w parts.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> > On 23 Apr 2018, at 08:49, finale-requ...@shsu.edu wrote:
> >
> > From: Christopher Smith <christopher.sm...@videotron.ca christopher.sm...@videotron.ca>>
> > Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
ale-requ...@shsu.edu wrote:
>
> From: Christopher Smith <christopher.sm...@videotron.ca
> <mailto:christopher.sm...@videotron.ca>>
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
> Date: 22 April 2018 at 23:51:34
> To: <finale@shsu.edu <mailto:finale@
er something
> of
> > an overstatement?
> >
> > -Lee
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf
> > Of
> > Christopher Smith
> > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:52 PM
> > To: final
Christopher Smith
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:52 PM
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
>
> Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got this!
>
> Fewer files is a HUGE time saver! You can enter all the cues with copy and
> paste (or the plug
@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Christopher Smith
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:52 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got this!
Fewer files is a HUGE time saver! You can enter all the cues with copy and
paste (or the plugin, which I find bu
Ooh, ooh, ooh! I got this!
Fewer files is a HUGE time saver! You can enter all the cues with copy and
paste (or the plugin, which I find buggy) without pasting between documents,
you can change the font sizes for tempi and rehearsal letters ONCE (or anything
else ONCE) and have it apply to all
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
My solution for many of these things (and I think many others have the
same workflow) is to have one file for the score and one file for the
(linked) parts. This is not as good as one file for everything, but it's
better than
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
>
> Your 2) and 3) are not correct. Music spacing is not linked between score
> and parts. You can also change clef in parts with staff styles
> (transposition>set to clef) in part only. 1) an
:30 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale Linked Parts: what's missing?
Your 2) and 3) are not correct. Music spacing is not linked between score and
parts. You can also change clef in parts with staff styles (transposition>set
to clef) in part only. 1) and 4) are valid, though.
My solution for many of these things (and I think many others have the
same workflow) is to have one file for the score and one file for the
(linked) parts. This is not as good as one file for everything, but it's
better than a bunch of separate files for extracted parts.
Given this workflow,
My Note Spacing plugin already allows you to have different spacing options
for parts and score (with saved settings). It doesn't do allotment tables,
though, so either part or score would have to use the reference duration
settings.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Skjalg Bjørstad <
Your 2) and 3) are not correct. Music spacing is not linked between score and
parts. You can also change clef in parts with staff styles (transposition>set
to clef) in part only. 1) and 4) are valid, though.
Skjalg - for anledningen på nett med iPhone.
> 22. apr. 2018 kl. 20:34 skrev Lee
I'm not a regular user of linked parts -- yes, I still make a copy of the
score and extract from there -- but I did make a reasonable effort several
years ago to incorporate them into my normal work flow. I gave up after a
month or so due to encountering too many situations that required special
13 matches
Mail list logo
