On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:58 PM, ThomaStudios wrote:
One word: TGTools
Where, exactly? I don't see anything there that would apply.
Others suggested changing the name in the normal way--but this affects
only unoptimized pages.
And to be precise, this is not actually a staff name, it's a
In a message dated 12/13/05 11:36:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One word: TGTools
Where, exactly? I don't see anything there that would apply.
Others suggested changing the name in the normal way--but this affects
only unoptimized pages.
Layout-Update Groups should work after you
Andrew,
Update Groups in TGTools will do exactly what you need. Since your
staves are optimized, nothing you do in scroll view will render in page
view unless you reoptimize. Probably something you won't want to do at
this point. Select the staff/group in page view using Mass Edit, and
On 13.12.2005 Andrew Stiller wrote:
Where, exactly? I don't see anything there that would apply.
TGTools:Layout:Update Groups...
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On 13.12.2005 dc wrote:
In which case you could simply use Finalescript:
search csta. replace cel.
and be done with it.
Excellent idea! Couldn't you also use Text Search and Replace?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
Windows EPS, among a lot of other things.
Readme:
http://downloads.makemusic.com/forms/Finale2006bWhatsNew.pdf
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Is it free? How does one get it?
Dean
On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Fisher, Allen wrote:
Windows EPS, among a lot of other things.
Readme:
http://downloads.makemusic.com/forms/Finale2006bWhatsNew.pdf
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Yes, it's free. The 2006b updater is available from
http://finalemusic.com, like all other incremental updates MakeMusic!
has offered.
--
Brad Beyenhof
Real-time Finale discussion: http://www.finaleirc.com
my blog: http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com
Silence will save me from being wrong (and
On 13 Dec 2005 at 16:29, Fisher, Allen wrote:
Windows EPS, among a lot of other things.
Readme:
http://downloads.makemusic.com/forms/Finale2006bWhatsNew.pdf
I am not in the habit of reading these documents, but this one looks
pretty darned impressive. I saw fixes for a huge number of bugs
At 06:32 PM 12/13/2005, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Is it free?
Maintenance updates for Finale are always free.
How does one get it?
Go to http://finalemusic.com and scroll down to the link on the right
that says Finale 2006b maintenance update available.
Aaron.
The bug which caused FinMac 2006 to quit when using printing presets
other than Standard has been cured (just tested it on a whole folder
of parts).
John
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
David W. Fenton wrote:It certainly looks to me like an honest effort was put in to do as thorough a job as possible to clean up a whole host of issues. That makes me feel a lot better about my commitment to Finale. Amen to that.Concern has sometimes been expressed on this list that MakeMusic
And Jim Bruce, head of customer support, told me in a phone conversation a couple of weeks ago, that the 2007 version will concentrate on the notation issues. Since those are the issues that are of primary interest to most of us on the list, this is the time to make suggestions. I have asked for
At 08:45 PM 12/13/05, you wrote:
And Jim Bruce, head of customer support, told me in a phone conversation a
couple of weeks ago, that the 2007 version will concentrate on the
notation issues. Since those are the issues that are of primary interest
to most of us on the list, this is the time
Chuck Israels wrote:
I have asked for some things, including some kind of score/part
connection, and they seem to be considering that. Sibelius has
forced this issue. I don't know this for sure.
When Sibelius first came up with this feature, there was a great deal
of clamour from
First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the
first thing I did when I opened 2006b.
Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a
time signature to a measure with an existing document (a copy of it
of course).
Nothing happens and I am at the end
First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the
first thing I did when I opened 2006b.
Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a
time signature to a measure with an existing document (a copy of it
of course).
Nothing happens and I am at the end
Much worse than that, I just discovered that changing time signatures
(independant for each 4 staves of this string quartet) at the end of
the document changed the time signature in the staves at the begining
(mesure 4) of the piece. Ouuuh!
Eric Dussault
Finale 2006b for Mac
La Note Bleue wrote:First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the first thing I did when I opened 2006b. Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a time signature to a measure with an existing document (a copy of it of course). Nothing happens and I
It is possible that it behaves this way with indepedant time signature on.Have you tried that?Le 05-12-13 à 21:53, Simon Troup a écrit :Hi Eric Can't reproduce that here at all. Eric DussaultFinale 2006b for MacPowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 GHz1GB Ram ___
Le 05-12-13 à 22:00, Éric Dussault a écrit :It works fine for me too with a normal setting with no independant time signatures.I rarely use this feature, but when I need it, it has to work reliably.Le 05-12-13 à 21:53, Simon Troup a écrit :Hi EricCan't reproduce that here at all. Eric
Éric Dussault wrote:Much worse than that, I just discovered that changing time signatures (independant for each 4 staves of this string quartet) OK that narrows it down a bit.John___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Giz Bowe wrote:
At 08:45 PM 12/13/05, you wrote:
And Jim Bruce, head of customer support, told me in a phone
conversation a couple of weeks ago, that the 2007 version will
concentrate on the notation issues. Since those are the issues
that are of primary
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:40 PM, John Bell wrote:
Chuck Israels wrote:
I have asked for some things, including some kind of score/part
connection, and they seem to be considering that. Sibelius has
forced this issue. I don't know this for sure.
When Sibelius first came up with this
On 14 Dec 2005 at 2:40, John Bell wrote:
When Sibelius first came up with this feature, there was a great deal
of clamour from Finale users wanting the same thing. While I can see
the usefulness of it in some circumstances, I am far from convinced
that it is really worthwhile.
Well, for
Indeed, I agree on all these points. Part/Score linking would be huge.
In addition, it would be good to have some sort of EASY way to apply
page formats to all the parts. Like a dialogue window where you can save
a Page format, load ones from a folder (like ones you liked from a
different
Yes, the parts/score linking is a top feature that Finale 2007 needs.
I think we need more articulations in Maestro for Jazz. I think Bill
Duncan was going to do something but who knows.
I can't really think of anything that I complain about other than
looking for some sort of jazz
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, at 01:47AM, Chuck Israels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And Jim Bruce, head of customer support, told me in a phone conversation a
couple of weeks ago, that
the 2007 version will concentrate on the notation issues. Since those are
the issues that are of
Oh, thats a good idea. Not. I think MakeMusic has dropped the ball with
2006, but I have hope they will get their act together for 2007 if they
promise linked score and parts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already decided not to upgrade to 2007 (the first upgrade I've missed in
10 years).
29 matches
Mail list logo
