Re: [Finale] GPO

2015-01-26 Thread Craig Parmerlee
I assumed that the instruments included with Finale were identical to the GPO instruments, just a subset. Is that not true? On 1/24/2015 10:12 PM, Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre wrote: Sorry, forgot to compare to the inherent Finale sounds Since I got the GPO, I never use the Finale sounds.

Re: [Finale] Ideas for drum set notation - multimeasure rests

2015-01-26 Thread Christopher Smith
Now that any idiot can push the button, he does. Colin Biggin, local hand copyist who taught me everything I know (but not everything HE knew!) Christopher On Mon Jan 26, at MondayJan 26 6:06 AM, David H. Bailey wrote: On 1/25/2015 11:55 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote: [snip] The really curious

Re: [Finale] GPO

2015-01-26 Thread David H. Bailey
On 1/26/2015 9:20 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote: I assumed that the instruments included with Finale were identical to the GPO instruments, just a subset. Is that not true? There are two different sound sources provided with recent versions of Finale. One is a subset of GPO instruments (and

Re: [Finale] GPO

2015-01-26 Thread Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
Which isn’t contradicted by what I said. I prefer using the larger set for its variety. Klaus Sendt fra min iPad Den 26/01/2015 kl. 15.20 skrev Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com: I assumed that the instruments included with Finale were identical to the GPO instruments, just a subset.

Re: [Finale] Ideas for drum set notation - multimeasure rests

2015-01-26 Thread David H. Bailey
On 1/25/2015 11:55 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote: [snip] The really curious thing is that I'd say 18 of those arrangements were musically quite acceptable and some were outstanding artistically. It seems a shame that the state of engraving should be so poor. [snip] It's especially shameful when