Re: [Finale] Simple not Simple

2007-07-14 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Aaron Sherber / 2007/07/13 / 02:26 PM wrote: Find the file Finale 2008/Help Files/Data/Skinmain/Skin.xml and open it in a text editor. The second line of this file should start with CatapultSkin. At the end of the line it says: UseBrowserDefaultSize=False Nice! Now I am happier with this

Re: [Finale] Simple not Simple

2007-07-14 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 01:35 PM 7/14/2007, A-NO-NE Music wrote: Do you have any better printing option? I just wanted to print Simple Entry Tool key command section. I first had to find out they are page 12-18 of 26 pages long section by PDFing to Preview.app. This is very inconvenient. Well, in Firefox, after

[Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread Andrew Stiller
One of the composers I publish sent me a gigantic picture of himself: 4 times the size of my screen, and 1.4 Mb. This seems to be too big for my web page designer, for when I try to insert it, all I get is the missing image block. Any ideas? BTW, all this is happening in Classic, where my web

Re: [Finale] Simple not Simple

2007-07-14 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Chuck Israels / 2007/07/13 / 04:55 PM wrote: The theory - among the MM guys, is that in Simple, you can add articulations and dynamics within the same tool - the same entry window. I get that, and I can see that as a way to save a step or two. What about the [9] bug? My entire purpose

Re: [Finale] Simple not Simple

2007-07-14 Thread A-NO-NE Music
I wrote: I found inconsistency between Speedy and Simple really screws me up. For example, you hit [=] after note entry for Tie in Speedy, but you have to press Cmd+Opt+T in Simple BEFORE note entry. Why it has to be so inconsistent, is my question. I just found you can hit T after the note.

Re: [Finale] Simple not Simple

2007-07-14 Thread Chuck Israels
Hi Hiro, If I keep my eyes open, the [9] bug doesn't cause me much trouble. I have encountered it when exploding entries, but I'm used to watching for it. I played with Simple for a while yesterday, but the Speedy Entry way of working is so ingrained in my workflow that I think I will

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread David W. Fenton
On 14 Jul 2007 at 14:00, Andrew Stiller wrote: One of the composers I publish sent me a gigantic picture of himself: 4 times the size of my screen, and 1.4 Mb. This seems to be too big for my web page designer, for when I try to insert it, all I get is the missing image block. Any ideas?

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jul 14, 2007, at 5:30 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Use your graphics editor to resize the picture to, say, 1/8th its present size (i.e., 1/2 your screen size). This is done through a process of resampling that will not reduce the quality of the image. No joy. I reduced the image to 12%

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread David W. Fenton
On 14 Jul 2007 at 19:50, Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 5:30 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Use your graphics editor to resize the picture to, say, 1/8th its present size (i.e., 1/2 your screen size). This is done through a process of resampling that will not reduce the quality of

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread Andrew Stiller
On Jul 14, 2007, at 7:58 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Have you looked at the actual HTML produced to see if the link is there to the picture? I did that just now, and the link is there, but oddly the picture is renamed. It's actual name is Clarke 12%.jpg but the html has it as Clarke

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread dhbailey
Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 7:58 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Have you looked at the actual HTML produced to see if the link is there to the picture? I did that just now, and the link is there, but oddly the picture is renamed. It's actual name is Clarke 12%.jpg but the html

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread Carl Dershem
Andrew Stiller wrote: Use your graphics editor to resize the picture to, say, 1/8th its present size (i.e., 1/2 your screen size). This is done through a process of resampling that will not reduce the quality of the image. No joy. I reduced the image to 12% of original size (208 Kb), but it

RE: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread Williams, Jim
%25 is the % character itself in a URL, just as %20 is a space. So try Clarke12%.jpg Worth a shot...and make sure cases are identical. From: dhbailey Sent: Sat 14-Jul-07 20:29 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: missing image Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 7:58 PM,

RE: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread Williams, Jim
Sorry--hit the send key too soon. oops From: Williams, Jim Sent: Sat 14-Jul-07 20:50 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: RE: [Finale] OT: missing image %25 is the % character itself in a URL, just as %20 is a space. So try Clarke12%.jpg Worth a shot...and make sure cases are identical. From:

[Finale] Re: Simple not Simple

2007-07-14 Thread Matthew Hindson fastmail account
Daivd H. Bailey wrote: But like Chuck, every time I try Simple Entry, I'm back with Speedy Entry immediately. I too am like this, even to the extent that when I teach my students I get them to use Speedy as well (which is probably a stupid thing for their education since Simple Entry is much

[Finale] Setting Default View Scaling

2007-07-14 Thread Leigh Daniels
Hello All, Is there any way to specify the default view scalings for Page and Scroll view? I want 150% for Page View and 90% for Scroll View so Finale will use these when I switch back and forth between the two. **Leigh ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] OT: missing image

2007-07-14 Thread David W. Fenton
On 14 Jul 2007 at 20:10, Andrew Stiller wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 7:58 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: Have you looked at the actual HTML produced to see if the link is there to the picture? I did that just now, and the link is there, but oddly the picture is renamed. It's actual name is

[Finale] 2K8 bug?

2007-07-14 Thread Chuck Israels
Has anyone else experienced the parts layout definition not working in linked parts? In a couple documents made from templates made from 2k7 documents, defining the distance between staves in the Page Format for Parts dialog turns into a much smaller value in the part. Easy enough to

[Finale] Piano - connect stems between staves?

2007-07-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can get the notes in both staves, but I can't find anything on showing them with their stems connected between the staves. Thanks, Frank ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] 2K8 bug?

2007-07-14 Thread Darcy James Argue
Hey Chuck, Do you by any chance have space systems evenly checked? Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 14 Jul 2007, at 10:56 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: Has anyone else experienced the parts layout definition not working in linked parts? In a couple documents made from

Re: [Finale] Piano - connect stems between staves?

2007-07-14 Thread Carl Dershem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can get the notes in both staves, but I can't find anything on showing them with their stems connected between the staves. Thanks, Frank Look up Cross-staff beams cd -- http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/# http://members.cox.net/dershem