Re: [Finale] default rest question

2014-05-20 Thread Steve Parker
I would use a double whole as per original. 
I would split off the last movement to a new doc and change the default. 

Steve P. 

 On 16 May 2014, at 19:55, Martin Banner mbanner...@aol.com wrote:
 
 Ryan,
 
 I checked the Dolmetsch book, and if I read it correctly, yes, double  
 whole rests are the standard in 4/2 time. The piece that I am editing  
 is a multimovement work, with the first movement being in 4/4 time,  
 and the last movement being the one in 4/2 time. I may have to resort  
 to speedy entry and put in the double whole rests. Do you know how I  
 can get Finale to center those double whole rests (I did that many  
 years ago, but don't remember how I did centered the rests).
 
 Thanks,
 Martin
 
 
 On May 16, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Ryan wrote:
 
 You're correct that the convention is to use a double whole rest in  
 4/2
 (and possibly some other large meters). I'd say that today that  
 practice is
 somewhat antiquated. Players will instantly understand that they are  
 to
 remain silent for the entire measure if there's a regular whole rest.
 
 That being said, if you really want the double whole rest as the  
 Default
 Whole Rest in Finale, go to Doc OptionsNotes  RestsRest  
 Characters pop
 up menu. Choose Default Whole Rest. Select the double whole rest  
 character
 (it's in slot 227 on my machine). Note that this will change all  
 default
 whole rests for every measure, regardless of the time signature. If  
 you're
 working in only 4/2, then this is probably OK. AFAIK, there is no  
 way to
 have Finale automatically use double whole rests in 4/2 and regular  
 whole
 rests in all other meters in the same document. You could insert them
 manually as expressions, though.
 
 
 On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Gippo Mercoli i...@clubgippo.com  
 wrote:
 
 I recenty had to solve a similar situation and I discovered (or  
 should I
 had to know?!) that no matter about the time signature, empty bars  
 need
 whole rest.
 
 
 --
 
 Gippo Mercoli
 www.clubgippo.com
 
 Il giorno 16/mag/2014, alle ore 17:05, Martin Banner mbanner...@aol.com 
 ha scritto:
 
 I am preparing a modern edition of an 18th century choral/orchestral
 work. The last several movements are in cut time (4/2), four beats  
 to
 a measure, half note gets the beat.
 
 Finale uses a whole rest as the default empty measure rest, but I'm
 not sure if this is preferable, or a double whole rest (which is  
 what
 actually is written by the composer in his autograph score). For a
 modern edition, is standard practice for an empty measure in 4/2  
 time
 a whole rest or double whole rest?
 
 If the concensus is double whole rest, how does one get the double
 whole rest centered in the empty measures?
 
 Thanks,
 Martin
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



[Finale] OT: Baroque Articulation

2014-05-20 Thread Lawrence Yates
For those who transcribe baroque manuscripts.

Am I correct in assuming that the articulation mark that looks like a
modern staccatissimo dagger should be transcribed as a modern staccato
dot?

It has been suggested to me that it should be interpreted as an articulated
note and not necessarily as a staccato in the modern sense (or is this
rubbish?)

Cheers,

Lawrence
-- 
Lawrenceyates.co.uk
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



Re: [Finale] OT: Baroque Articulation

2014-05-20 Thread J D Thomas
I have a client that uses these articulations pretty extensively, in addition 
to normal staccato dots.  We refer to them as martellato staccato, and IIRC 
they are accented staccato.

YMMV.

J D Thomas
ThomaStudios



On May 20, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Lawrence Yates yateslawre...@gmail.com wrote:

 For those who transcribe baroque manuscripts.
 
 Am I correct in assuming that the articulation mark that looks like a
 modern staccatissimo dagger should be transcribed as a modern staccato
 dot?
 
 It has been suggested to me that it should be interpreted as an articulated
 note and not necessarily as a staccato in the modern sense (or is this
 rubbish?)
 
 Cheers,
 
 Lawrence
 -- 
 Lawrenceyates.co.uk
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



Re: [Finale] OT: Baroque Articulation

2014-05-20 Thread Eric Fiedler
I would try to reproduce the sign (a hyphen rotated 90 degrees CCW) in your 
editions. Most specialists will know what to do with it. The consensus seems to 
be something between a marcato and a slightly shortend, slightly accented  
portato. Easy enough in Shape Designer.
Eric

*
Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
www.habsburgerverlag.de
webmas...@habsburgerverlag.de
*

Am 20.05.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Lawrence Yates yateslawre...@gmail.com:

 For those who transcribe baroque manuscripts.
 
 Am I correct in assuming that the articulation mark that looks like a
 modern staccatissimo dagger should be transcribed as a modern staccato
 dot?
 
 It has been suggested to me that it should be interpreted as an articulated
 note and not necessarily as a staccato in the modern sense (or is this
 rubbish?)
 
 Cheers,
 
 Lawrence
 -- 
 Lawrenceyates.co.uk
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



Re: [Finale] OT: Baroque Articulation

2014-05-20 Thread Kim Patrick Clow
It's such a thorny issue because in many baroque parts, the markings are so
inconsistent (sometimes they are clearly staccato markings, but in a set of
doublet-parts, where there are two copies of violin 1, the same bar will
have wedges / daggers. My editor has suggested to duplicate the markings as
found in the sources and note the inconsistently and let the performers
make their own decisions. Most musicians who are trained in early music or
perform on historical instruments will make their own choices anyway.

Thanks
Kim


Am 20.05.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Lawrence Yates yateslawre...@gmail.com:

  For those who transcribe baroque manuscripts.
 
  Am I correct in assuming that the articulation mark that looks like a
  modern staccatissimo dagger should be transcribed as a modern staccato
  dot?
 
  It has been suggested to me that it should be interpreted as an
 articulated
  note and not necessarily as a staccato in the modern sense (or is this
  rubbish?)
 
  Cheers,
 
  Lawrence
  --
  Lawrenceyates.co.uk
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
  To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
  finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 



 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



Re: [Finale] OT: Baroque Articulation

2014-05-20 Thread Lawrence Yates
Thanks to all who have responded.

What I have done so far is what Kim has suggested.  I thought, having never
had any formal training in transcription, that maybe I was missing
something.

Thanks,

Lawrence


On 20 May 2014 18:13, Kim Patrick Clow telem...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's such a thorny issue because in many baroque parts, the markings are so
 inconsistent (sometimes they are clearly staccato markings, but in a set of
 doublet-parts, where there are two copies of violin 1, the same bar will
 have wedges / daggers. My editor has suggested to duplicate the markings as
 found in the sources and note the inconsistently and let the performers
 make their own decisions. Most musicians who are trained in early music or
 perform on historical instruments will make their own choices anyway.

 Thanks
 Kim


 Am 20.05.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Lawrence Yates yateslawre...@gmail.com:
 
   For those who transcribe baroque manuscripts.
  
   Am I correct in assuming that the articulation mark that looks like a
   modern staccatissimo dagger should be transcribed as a modern
 staccato
   dot?
  
   It has been suggested to me that it should be interpreted as an
  articulated
   note and not necessarily as a staccato in the modern sense (or is this
   rubbish?)
  
   Cheers,
  
   Lawrence
   --
   Lawrenceyates.co.uk
   ___
   Finale mailing list
   Finale@shsu.edu
   https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
  
   To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
   finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
  
 
 
 
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
  To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
  finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu




-- 
Lawrenceyates.co.uk
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu



[Finale] clear manual positioning of tuplets

2014-05-20 Thread Ryan
Finale 2014 Mac OS X 10.9

I'd like to reset the manual positioning of all tuplets so they revert back
to the tuple settings I've defined.

I copied and pasted music from someone else's file and their tuplet
settings were included. I'm looking for a way to automatically clear all
tuplets without having to edit them individually.

I've used the Change…Tuplets command under the Utilities menu, but that
doesn't clear any of the manual positioning.

Thanks
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

Re: [Finale] clear manual positioning of tuplets

2014-05-20 Thread Robert Patterson
Does the Reset button in Change...-Tuplets not achieve what you wish?


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Ryan ry.squa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Finale 2014 Mac OS X 10.9

 I'd like to reset the manual positioning of all tuplets so they revert back
 to the tuple settings I've defined.

 I copied and pasted music from someone else's file and their tuplet
 settings were included. I'm looking for a way to automatically clear all
 tuplets without having to edit them individually.

 I've used the Change…Tuplets command under the Utilities menu, but that
 doesn't clear any of the manual positioning.

 Thanks
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

 To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
 finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu