It happened to me to, in the same circumstances. I recall going through the
preferences panels and verifying all settings.
Giovanni
> On 31 Aug 2018, at 15:24, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>
> Sounds like you are missing a font.
>
> Sent from my iSomething
> --
>
>
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 6:17 AM,
This is a problem with Adope Type 3 Postscript Fonts. (A font format from
the 1980s.) You may be able to fix the problem by first saving the file in
Fin14.5 or Fin14d. Otherwise you will have to find otf alternatives.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Eric Dannewitz
wrote:
> Sounds like you are
Sounds like you are missing a font.
Sent from my iSomething
--
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 6:17 AM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
>
> I recently used Finale 25 to open a file that was created with Finale Mac
> 2K7.
> Text instructions that I used in the file are now displaying as a series of
>
I recently used Finale 25 to open a file that was created with Finale Mac 2K7.
Text instructions that I used in the file are now displaying as a series of
boxes with a "?" in the middle of each box.
Am I correct in thinking that I have a font issue?
How can I get these expressions to
Sounds like one of the famous Mac font problems, probably caused by using
PostScript type AND TrueType fonts enabled at the same time. Possibly you will
have to clear a font cache (whatever that means, but I ran the fix and it
worked for me.)
Go here and read the sticky called Font Problems on
I finally fixed the problem by clearing my font caches using a freeware
utility called FontNuke.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Hi List,
For some reason, the following fonts don't show up in the font selection db
in Finale 2010 or earlier running in MacOs 10.7.2 (Lion). There are blank
white spaces in the list where they would normally appear, and older
documents seem to display them OK, and newer versions of Finale and
these should all be listed in the symbol font document by default,
but check just in case.
Finale 2010/Component Files/MacSymbolFonts.txt
did you notice this after and update / upgrade?
not clear... this works for you in F2011?
___
Finale mailing
after migration to OSX.6 (from 10.4.11) on new macbook pro the finale
fonts are not appearing properly on screen. in the dialogue boxes
everything is correct. my own custom fonts (open type) are fine, but
maestro (for ex.) displays the wrong character it would seem. i
reinstalled
You need to go into Font Book, and see if there are duplicates.
Or you can compare the Library/Fonts and
/User/YOURUSERNAME/Library/Fonts and delete/move the duplicates.
On 1/30/10 12:58 PM, SN jef chippewa wrote:
after migration to OSX.6 (from 10.4.11) on new macbook pro the finale
fonts
fantastic, perfect, thanks!
You need to go into Font Book, and see if there are duplicates.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Fin 2008a.r1 Mac OS 10.4.10
I havent used Finale in a little while, and I now have what u get
when there's a font problem--strange symbols appear instead of
notes, etc.
How do I get my fonts back to displaying correctly in Fin?
(The only thing I had done somewhat recently is I sent a
I installed the Mac Fontpacks from the MM site, and all seems ok now--
thanks
Bob
On Nov 16, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Bob Morabito wrote:
Fin 2008a.r1 Mac OS 10.4.10
I havent used Finale in a little while, and I now have what u get
when there's a font problem--strange symbols appear instead of
.
If interested, please email me privately; I'll reply with a flyer
containing font samples and an order form. Mention you need the Finale fonts,
and
I'll attach those along with the Unicode fonts. The conference discount
price is $75, a bargain for the eight TrueType fonts, each containing 191
On 12 Jul 2009 at 14:36, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Not that I mean to be a killjoy here, but part of what Mark D Lew wrote:
More promising is Microsoft's new suite of ClearType fonts that have
been included with Office for the past couple years. These are the
ones that all start with C
On 12 Jul 2009 at 19:51, dhbailey wrote:
But I doubt that they ever expect to enforce that at all --
it's more likely something they were forced to include in
their licensing from whomever they licensed the fonts in the
first place. Microsoft probably doesn't have the right to
license
On 12 Jul 2009 at 15:04, John Howell wrote:
This past school year I started getting text assignments
(not music notation) turned in using Cambria, which is apparently the
default font in the most recent MSWord for Windows, and I find it VERY
difficult to read on screen. The default size is
On 12 Jul 2009 at 20:33, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
If there is a
restrictive clause in the license of fonts, the fact that no one is
going to enforce the license does not make it right to violate the
terms, even if everybody does it.
Is there such a clause? I don't believe there is. Please
On 13 Jul 2009 at 6:54, dhbailey wrote:
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Mark D Lew wrote:
Whether Microsoft allows use of the fonts outside of their software
packages that include them, I don't know, but I do know that MS has
the right to license them however they choose.
The fonts
On 12 Jul 2009 at 20:40, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Mark D Lew wrote:
Whether Microsoft allows use of the fonts outside of their software
packages that include them, I don't know, but I do know that MS has
the right to license them however they choose.
The fonts are presumably
One small correction to David F's recent posts on this topic:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:45 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Microsoft has in-house people who create these fonts.
While it is true that Microsoft does have an in-house font division,
at least some (possibly all) of the six fonts in
Mark D Lew wrote:
One small correction to David F's recent posts on this topic:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:45 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Microsoft has in-house people who create these fonts.
While it is true that Microsoft does have an in-house font division, at
least some (possibly all) of
David Bailey wrote:
I just read the EULA for Microsoft Office and there is no
section restricting the use of the fonts to just Office
applications. [...]
It says nothing about what can be done with the fonts when
the applications aren't running. [...]
Thanks for providing the relevant
On 7/14/2009 3:30 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
In any way that ordinary users use fonts, I'm not sure it's even possible
to use the fonts when the software isn't running.
Since the EULA comes with MS Office, I think the question is what the
user is allowed to to when *Office* isn't running, not when
Mark D Lew wrote:
David Bailey wrote:
I just read the EULA for Microsoft Office and there is
no section restricting the use of the fonts to just
Office applications. [...]
It says nothing about what can be done with the fonts
when the applications aren't running. [...]
Thanks for
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Mark D Lew wrote:
Whether Microsoft allows use of the fonts outside of their software
packages that include them, I don't know, but I do know that MS has
the right to license them however they choose.
The fonts are presumably included in the license for certain
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Mark D Lew wrote:
Whether Microsoft allows use of the fonts outside of their software
packages that include them, I don't know, but I do know that MS has
the right to license them however they choose.
The fonts are presumably included in the license for certain
On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:54 AM, dhbailey wrote:
That agreement between Microsoft and Ascender may be why the
license with Microsoft Office is so restrictive.
Wait, wait. So far we have not established that the license *is*
restrictive. Someone speculated that it might be, but no one has
On 7/13/2009 2:10 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
ClearType is a specific method of type definition*, developed and
owned by Microsoft, introduced with Vista. The purpose of ClearType
was to enhance screen readability.
...
typeface in two different languages, which may have behaved
differently in
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
A minor correction (and I haven't been following this whole
discussion): ClearType is not a font programming language or a
method of type definition. It is a technology for displaying fonts
on digital displays, regardless of whether those
On 7/13/2009 2:10 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
ClearType is a specific method of type definition*, developed and
owned by Microsoft, introduced with Vista.
Also, ClearType was introduced with XP, though I think it may have been
off by default. It can be turned on in the Display control panel.
On 7/13/2009 2:34 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:
Thanks for the correction. But is it not true that to be optimized
for ClearType display they must have data in them that the ClearType
renderer reads? Did OpenType fonts have this data all along, or is it
new?
My understanding is that there is no extra
Mark D. Lew wrote:
More promising is Microsoft's new suite of ClearType fonts that have
been included with Office for the past couple years. These are the
ones that all start with C (Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Consolas,
Constantia, Corbel). I'm on Mac at home, and our computers at work
aren't
At 2:13 PM +0200 7/12/09, Daniel Wolf wrote:
Mark D. Lew wrote:
More promising is Microsoft's new suite of ClearType fonts that have
been included with Office for the past couple years. These are the
ones that all start with C (Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Consolas,
Constantia, Corbel). I'm on
Friends,
Not that I mean to be a killjoy here, but part of what Mark D Lew wrote:
More promising is Microsoft's new suite of ClearType fonts that have
been included with Office for the past couple years. These are the
ones that all start with C (Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Consolas,
How is that *remotely* enforceable?
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
djar...@earthlink.net
Brooklyn, NY
On 12 Jul 2009, at 3:36 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Friends,
Not that I mean to be a killjoy here, but part of what Mark D Lew
wrote:
More promising is Microsoft's new suite of ClearType fonts
Darcy James Argue wrote:
How is that *remotely* enforceable?
It's not, but like anything these days, the lawsuits are won
by those with the deepest pockets not those with justice nor
the law on their side necessarily. And there ain't nobody
with deeper pockets than Micro$oft.
But I
Friends,
When Darcy James Argue writes, asking:
How is that *remotely* enforceable?
I would be right at the head of the line of those who would concede that
it's not.
But enforceability is not the same thing as honesty. If there is a
restrictive clause in the license of fonts, the fact that
On Jul 12, 2009, at 4:51 PM, dhbailey wrote:
But I doubt that they ever expect to enforce that at all -- it's
more likely something they were forced to include in their
licensing from whomever they licensed the fonts in the first
place. Microsoft probably doesn't have the right to license
Mark D Lew wrote:
Whether Microsoft allows use of the fonts outside of their software
packages that include them, I don't know, but I do know that MS has
the right to license them however they choose.
The fonts are presumably included in the license for certain Microsoft
products,
At 10:56 AM +0200 7/9/09, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Just out of interest, I did a survey a long time ago with singers -
to see which font they preferred to read for lyrics. The vast
majority elected a sans serif font, one with a more 'hand written'
look to it than a classic 'printers' font.
On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Mark D Lew wrote:
At 10:56 AM +0200 7/9/09, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Just out of interest, I did a survey a long time ago with singers -
to see which font they preferred to read for lyrics. The vast
majority elected a sans serif font, one with a more 'hand
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:31:37 -0500
Noel Stoutenburg mjol...@ticnet.com wrote:
bassm...@katamail.com wrote:
By larger appearance I mean that there's more room and looser spacing in
sans serifs compared to serifs - just compare the relative size of Times
10 and Helvetica 10.
The fact
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:34:00 -0400
John Howell john.how...@vt.edu wrote:
At 10:56 AM +0200 7/9/09, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Just out of interest, I did a survey a long time ago with singers -
to see which font they preferred to read for lyrics. The vast
majority elected a sans serif font, one
Rule of thumb for the piece title or main title is to make the
largest letters the same size as the staff height.
Interesting. I generally like the title quite a bit larger. Where
does this suggestion come from? (Your other suggestions make very
good sense, by the way.)
This is
At 8:58 PM +0200 7/10/09, Jonathan Smith wrote:
These were pro singers from light classical and music theatre
backgrounds aged around 20 to mid 30s. They had become used to
reading from hand copied parts especially for shows and last minute
prep. sessions. They preferred fonts that had a
bassm...@katamail.com wrote:
By larger appearance I mean that there's more room and looser spacing in
sans serifs compared to serifs - just compare the relative size of Times
10 and Helvetica 10.
The fact that theres more room and looser spacing in Helvetica than in
Times is part of the
Technical, instructions etc, : Regular type, usually above staff
Style, interpretation etc, : Italic, usually below staff
Titles and Text blocks are best left in the same font suit, maybe in
different sizes or strengths.
Rule of thumb for the piece title or main title is to make the
At 10:56 AM +0200 7/9/09, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Rule of thumb for the piece title or main title is to make the
largest letters the same size as the staff height.
Interesting. I generally like the title quite a bit larger. Where
does this suggestion come from? (Your other suggestions make
Jonathan Smith wrote:
Just out of interest, I did a survey a long time ago with singers - to
see which font they preferred to read for lyrics. The vast majority
elected a sans serif font, one with a more 'hand written' look to it
than a classic 'printers' font.
When I was in college, for
I know that many of you are very particular about the fonts you use
for for tempos and tempo modifications, instrument names, technical
instructions (arco, pizz., a2, con sord., div., G.P., etc.), titles
and subtitles, composer's name, copyright info, etc. I've worked out
(not very
Paul Hayden wrote:
1. For technical instructions (see above), do you use italic? Bold?
Roman? Some of both?
Although I haven't thoroughly studied this, my impression (and my
custom) is, that if a directive applies to the entire ensemble, I tend
to use italic; if it applies to a single part,
Hi Paul,
For technique-type of things (telling the performers what to do or how
to play their instrument), I use Roman. For expressivo marking (dolce
etc) and indeed sim., sempre etc. I use italic.
Asyla is published by my publisher (Faber Music) and while they've never
conveyed any
My own preference is:
1) Anything that affects tempo (including Accel. and Rit.) above the
staff in 14 pt. bold type.
2) All other techniques above the staff in in 12 pt. regular type,
except...
3) Expressions that affect dynamics: sub. p, sempre f, cresc.
dim. etc. -- these go below
On 30.10.2008 Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
This is one of the few cases where we disagree (a little).
Finale could automatically calculate as a first step, but I would prefer
to have the tool available. I used it when I worked up the Revere font set
in a Finale version for my own use.
I am not
On 30.10.2008 Allen Fisher wrote:
Actually, no, Finale can't automatically determine the height of font
characters. That's why we made FAN files in the first place.
Well, are you saying that Finale cannot, or that it is impossible to be
done? The latter seems very unlikely to me. You have
The font description provides the height of the tallest character,
which for text fonts, that's the lowercase l or uppercase M. In a
music font the tallest character is the treble ottava (right term?)
clef.
On Nov 3, 2008, at 4:21 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 30.10.2008 Allen Fisher
On 04.11.2008 Allen Fisher wrote:
The font description provides the height of the tallest character, which for text fonts, that's the
lowercase l or uppercase M. In a music font the tallest character is the
treble ottava (right term?) clef.
The font description describes every character. At
Hi Allen,
FAN files are definitely used with articulations! It's a recent change
(Fin2006 maybe?) but they are now definitely part of the equation. As
you will discover if you import an older file that uses articulations
in fonts that do not have corresponding FANs.
Cheers,
- Darcy
Actually, I have never understood why Finale doesn't automatically
calculate these FAN files. It shouldn't be difficult to do this from the
font itself, and anyone who has done it manually knows this is a really
tedious process (and the Finale tool for this is really badly designed).
Johannes
On Thu, October 30, 2008 3:29 am, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Actually, I have never understood why Finale doesn't automatically
calculate these FAN files. It shouldn't be difficult to do this from the
font itself, and anyone who has done it manually knows this is a really
tedious process (and the
Actually, no, Finale can't automatically determine the height of font
characters. That's why we made FAN files in the first place.
I don't disagree that the tool for editing can be improved, however.
On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Actually, I have never understood why
Listers,
What are Font Annotation Files and what do they do?
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 06:02 AM 10/29/2008, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
What are Font Annotation Files and what do they do?
Basically, they describe the bounding box of characters in a font, so
that Finale can allot the proper amount of space for collision
avoidance of text expressions and articulations.
Aaron.
Actually, they are used with the selection tool and the tuplet tool. I
don't believe that they're used with articulations or Expressions.
On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:02 AM 10/29/2008, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
What are Font Annotation Files and what do they do?
Hi Henry
Try this ...
PREFERENCES TYPE AUTO TRACING TYPE OBJECT SELECTION BY PATH ONLY
make sure this is checked. If you don't, then you are prone to
selecting things using the whole bounding box rather than just the
path, which means that something with a large bounding box that is
front
I may need to export EPS or postscript into ILLUSTRATOR to achieve certain
editorial conventions.
I cannot select stems in beamed eighth notes as an Item to adjust in
ILLUSTRATOR. I can select noteheads, the beams themselves, and flags on
various note values.
I hope someone else has tried and
henry,
this may or not solve the problem, but there are two different
selection tools in illustrator that function quite differently. also
make sure to click outside everything (eg. outside the page edge) to
make sure NOTHING is selected before clicking on an item to select.
i haven't had
I've been able to export as EPS and edit in Illustrator. I just tried
again and it works with 2k7 and AI CS2.
What might be happening to you is that the stem is placed behind the
notehead character, which takes up almost the entire vertical real
estate of the stem.
Try any of the
One of my favorite fonts is Tekton. I use it to name the various
tune titles in my medleys. It is very clear and it certainly
catches the eye. (I am on a Mac platformis Tekton available for
PCs)?
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times as a lyric
font. I'd like to
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:12 AM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
One of my favorite fonts is Tekton. I use it to name the various
tune titles in my medleys. It is very clear and it certainly
catches the eye. (I am on a Mac platformis Tekton available
for PCs)?
Tekton is offered by both
Mark D Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just ran through my font library trying all the
classic serifs I've got. Many of them were too wide
to be practical. Three or four others are roughly the
same proportions as Times and Caslon with slightly
different looks. Aside from Minion, the only
On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Ken Moore wrote:
You don't mention Georgia, which I use mainly for its figures (with
ascenders and descenders). At 22 point, it has about the same x-
height as 24-point TNR, but it may be too wide for your purposes.
I like Georgia, but it's far too wide for
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times as a lyric
font. I'd like to ask what other fonts people typically use for
lyrics, text boxes, text expressions, etc. Is there something close
to standard. If it would be better to reply off-list, please feel
free to do so.
Thank
Brennon Bortz wrote:
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times as a lyric font.
I'd like to ask what other fonts people typically use for lyrics, text
boxes, text expressions, etc. Is there something close to standard.
If it would be better to reply off-list, please feel free to
On 26.02.2007 Brennon Bortz wrote:
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times as a lyric font. I'd like to ask
what other fonts people typically use for lyrics, text boxes, text expressions, etc. Is
there something close to standard. If it would be better to reply off-list,
On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Brennon Bortz wrote:
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times as a lyric
font. I'd like to ask what other fonts people typically use for
lyrics, text boxes, text expressions, etc. Is there something
close to standard. If it would be better to
. As you say
they are not good choices.
Guess I'm showing may age here - Oh well!
George
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:29 AM
Subject: SPAM LOW: Re: [Finale] Fonts
On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Brennon
I use Times New Roman italic 14 pt. for text expressions, normal for
fingerings (guitar), and bold for tempo text. Some years ago I adventured
into obscure fonts and ran into portability disasters. You will probably
hear some here disparage TNR but beware selecting fonts that are uncommon.
On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Brennon Bortz wrote:
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times as a lyric
font. I'd like to ask what other fonts people typically use for
lyrics, text boxes, text expressions, etc. Is there something
close to standard. If it would be better to
to
investigate.
George
- Original Message -
From: Mark D Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:26 PM
Subject: SPAM LOW: Re: [Finale] Fonts
On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Brennon Bortz wrote:
Recently, someone mentioned resorting to using Times
On Feb 26, 2007, at 11:45 AM, George Brooke wrote:
I, too, have found Minion to be a very useable typeface. It's
relatively elegant looking and very readable at all sizes. As you
point out, it comes in a variety of faces which adds to its
versatility. I also like Caslon but, like you,
Not too long ago people mentioned getting the stupid looking misprint of big
3's weird looking print from older files caused by not having updated fonts.
One person said to get Cocktail. I looked up Cocktail there was no
mention of fonts.
What was the remedy for updating the old files with
i've noticed this since moving up to 2007, every once in awhile when
scrolling through the expression list all the expressions i have
defined as fixed size are larger than they normally appear in the
menu. sometimes they are so large that i can't even read them (at
least twice as large).
I'd second this. Bill's articulations font (plus all his other great
fonts, like rehearsal and enclosure) and Maestro font make for clear,
professional looking charts. I used to think the Jazz font was great.
Hell, I bought it before it was bundled with Finale (like, 1995ish?). I
even bought
does anyone have examples of the various fonts used for jazz, ideally
this would be the same sheet of music in X versions, corresponding to
X fonts. i'm interested in the music and text fonts, and not just
the ones bundled with finale.
cheers,
jef
--
shirling neueweise ... new music
Dear Jef,
I use Maestro combined with Bill Duncan's chord font (that I find to
be beautiful, clear, and relatively compact in relation to its
readability) and a few of his other special fonts for rehearsal
letters and articulations. While there are some who like the Finale
Jazz font, I
Hi,
First of all, thanks for all your suggestions for default settings. Now for
a quick question: is there a way that I can track down a list of fonts that
are used in a particular document? I can swap fonts if I know what font I
want to swap and I can do a data check to find out how many fonts
TGTools has a Font Info feature. Its under Misc-Font Info
I don't know if it's in the free version or not.
Greg Scheer wrote:
Hi,
First of all, thanks for all your suggestions for default settings. Now for
a quick question: is there a way that I can track down a list of fonts that
are used
I made a PDF of a Finale file on my PC using CutePDF. Then I eMailed it to
someone who uses a Mac. They said it looked unreadable, like hieroglyphics,
*except* for the lyrics. It so happens I used Arial for the lyrics. The rest
were Finale fonts. This makes me think that the problem
, *except* for the lyrics. It so happens I used Arial for
the lyrics. The rest were Finale fonts. This makes me think that the
problem is something like the Mac needing to have all the Finale fonts
installed in order for the PDF file to work properly.
I was under the impression that a PDF file
Hi there: I haven't subscribed in a while but have come back since I
have a question that has come up. I am way behind in many things,
including Finale, which is 2000c for Mac. (I have to boot in OS 9 to
use it, can't even run it in Classic.) So, I opened a couple of quite
elderly files
William Spencer wrote:
Hi there: I haven't subscribed in a while but have come back since I
have a question that has come up. I am way behind in many things,
including Finale, which is 2000c for Mac. (I have to boot in OS 9 to
use it, can't even run it in Classic.) So, I opened a couple
In a message dated 9/24/05 6:02:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi there: I haven't subscribed in a while but have come back since I
have a question that has come up. I am way behind in many things,
including Finale, which is 2000c for Mac. (I have to boot in OS 9 to
use it, can't
I need the collective help of the list here. I restarted my computer
this morning after working for a couple of hours in Finale. After the
restart, all my fonts were gone, so to speak. When I open FontBook,
the User collection and Classic are off and greyed out. Shit!! I've
repaired
Title: Re: [Finale] fonts in OS X (slightly OT)
Chuck--
If you have OS 10.3, check out FontBook. Its sort of an ATM-ish thing built right into the OS. We added some support for it in Finale 2005.
Otherwise, youll want to investigate something like Extensis Suitcase.
Allen
On 12/3/04 2:10
Addressed to all the MAC gurus, Darcy, Brad, Chris and the rest of you. You know who you are.
How does one manage fonts in Finale in OS X? I have a long list from which I usually need to select from a dozen or so. Isn't there a way to show only the ones you need to see in OS X? Why don't I
Hi Chuck,
There are others on this list that know much more than I do about
third party font management software so I will leave that to them.
But here's my .02 worth.
There are three main OS X places (four if you are using the Classic
environment too--OS 9 System FolderFonts) where fonts
98 matches
Mail list logo
