Hi Darcy--
The correct price is $85, not $65 dollars, and its regularly $169,
not $129
http://shop.avid.com/store/product.do?product=306830378742688
The sale has been going on for the entire month of January and has
been extended to Feb 14, due to strong demand , and problems keeping
Hi Bob,
If you had actually clicked the link in my original message, you would have
found that the offer I mentioned is indeed $65, reduced from $129.
Here's the link again:
http://store.soundtree.com/Sibelius-6-Upgrade-Academic_p_239.html
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB:
Hi all,
Well, that message came off as rather grumpier than I'd intended! Sorry about
that, Bob.
The $65 upgrade price I linked to is the Academic price. Bob is indeed correct
that the upgrade price for non-academic users is $85 -- unlike Finale, Sibelius
has tiered pricing for upgrades as
No problem Darcy--
and i had already emailed the list, previous to your email here,
explaining about the Academic vs the Professional upgrade..
however my emails to this list sometimes take hours to get here..
Thanks
Bob
On Feb 3, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi all,
Well,
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your understanding!
The occasional very long delays before emails go out to the list are a mystery
to me too.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 3 Feb 2011, at 4:58 PM, Bob Morabito wrote:
No problem Darcy--
and i had already emailed the
Hi Darcy--
Yes and thats for the ACADEMIC upgrade..the price I quoted was for
the PROFESSIONAL upgrade, which I believe more people would be using,
and qualified for.
Thanks
Bob Morabito
On Feb 3, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Bob,
If you had actually clicked the link in
Hi Darcy-
You're welcome..and I see my referred to post below just
arrived..almost an hour later..:)
Thanks
Bob
On Feb 3, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your understanding!
The occasional very long delays before emails go out to the list
are a mystery to
Hi all,
For those on this list who also use Sibelius from time to time (as I do), you
may be interested to know that they are offering heavily discounted upgrades to
Sib6 from earlier versions (currently $65 instead of $129):
http://store.soundtree.com/Sibelius-6-Upgrade-Academic_p_239.html
Send it to me Dennis.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:48 PM, dc den...@free.fr wrote:
Could anyone convert one Sibelius 6 file to 5 (or to xml)?
Many thanks,
Dennis
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
At 8:48 PM +0200 10/3/10, dc wrote:
Could anyone convert one Sibelius 6 file to 5 (or to xml)?
Many thanks,
Dennis
Yes. Anyone with Sibelius 6 can save it (Export it in Sib-speak) as
anything back to and including Sibelius 2. I can also open anything
back to Sibelius 2. It is only
On 25.05.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
How is pointing out past history in danger of starting a platform
war?
David, I didn't mean that you were starting one, but I wanted to prevent
anyone else from making one out of this. It has happened every single
time in the past.
Johannes
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 25.05.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
How is pointing out past history in danger of starting a platform war?
David, I didn't mean that you were starting one, but I wanted to prevent
anyone else from making one out of this. It has happened every single
time in the
...@musikmanufaktur.com wrote:
From: Johannes Gebauer li...@musikmanufaktur.com
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius 6
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Monday, May 25, 2009, 1:29 AM
On 25.05.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
On 24 May 2009 at 19:21, Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's been three and a half years since
On 25 May 2009 at 7:29, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 25.05.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
On 24 May 2009 at 19:21, Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's been three and a half years since the Intel Macs were first
introduced, which is practically an eternity in tech-years. You are
going to
Sibelius 6 requires Core Duo or better, 1GB+ total physical RAM (2GB
recommended), 3.5GB total hard disk space
Those of us who still use G5s would have to upgrade before using Sibelius 6.
Mark McCarron
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On Sat, 23 May 2009 13:20 -0700, Mark McCarron mmcg...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Sibelius 6 requires Core Duo or better, 1GB+ total physical RAM (2GB
recommended), 3.5GB total hard disk space
Those of us who still use G5s would have to upgrade before using Sibelius
6.
That's not what the web site
On 25.05.2009 Will Roberts wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 13:20 -0700, Mark McCarron mmcg...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Sibelius 6 requires Core Duo or better, 1GB+ total physical RAM (2GB
recommended), 3.5GB total hard disk space
Those of us who still use G5s would have to upgrade before using
It's been three and a half years since the Intel Macs were first
introduced, which is practically an eternity in tech-years. You are
going to see a lot of new software dropping PPC support soon.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
djar...@earthlink.net
Brooklyn, NY
On 23 May 2009, at 4:20 PM, Mark
On 24 May 2009 at 19:21, Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's been three and a half years since the Intel Macs were first
introduced, which is practically an eternity in tech-years. You are
going to see a lot of new software dropping PPC support soon.
There's history on this. After the switch to
On 25.05.2009 Johannes Gebauer wrote:
The German blurb says only:
Mac
Sibelius 5: Mac OS X 10.4.9 oder neuer oder Mac OS X 10.5, 350 MB
Festplattenkapazität, 512 MB oder mehr RAM empfohlen, DVD-ROM-Laufwerk
Sibelius Sounds Essentials und Kontakt Player 2: 3,5 GB Festplattenkapazität
On 25.05.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
On 24 May 2009 at 19:21, Darcy James Argue wrote:
It's been three and a half years since the Intel Macs were first
introduced, which is practically an eternity in tech-years. You are
going to see a lot of new software dropping PPC support soon.
I wanted to reply to a couple of the comments raised regarding file
conversion back and forth between Finale and Sibelius:
I won't switch until either MakeMusic goes under
or until Sibelius can open, natively, Finale files.
The latter will not happen. Sibelius 6 has removed the importers for
- sibelius' user base is (still) mainly based on the people who use it
lightly or for industrial purposes, and not for serious engraving.
these persons are usually happy with the program/standard output as is,
and many times don't go down enough to get into some of the small
At first, I just let that roll off. Over the years, I have come to expect
that kind of condescending attitude from some Finale users. Indeed, that
was my frist response to Sibelius (v.1) 10 years ago after years of
Finale
use (beginning with Fin 2.2).
probably that sounds condescending, but
- sibelius' user base is (still) mainly based on the people who use it
lightly or for industrial purposes, and not for serious engraving.
these
persons are usually happy with the program/standard output as is, and
many
times don't go down enough to get into some of the small
mu...@rgsmithmusic.com wrote:
If you approach Sibelius as if it were Finale, you'll be frustrated. If
you're willing to let Sibelius be itself and change your working method to
fit Sibelius, you'll probably be very happy.
Finale and Sibelius think differently. If you think like Sibelius you'll
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah ... it's kind of like finding a church you like.
Sort of -- usually with finding a church you like, that's
where you stay, rather than finding two different churches
you like and alternating worship services between the two.
But with notation software,
Christopher Smith wrote:
That sounds fair enough. The only trouble is my entire computer notation
life was built ground up with Finale, so I find Sibelius hard to get
around.
Mine had been as well, moving from MusicPrinterPlus to
Finale way back around 1991 or so, and then making the first
João Pais wrote:
- sibelius' user base is (still) mainly based on the people who use it
lightly or for industrial purposes, and not for serious engraving.
these
persons are usually happy with the program/standard output as is, and
many
times don't go down enough to get into some of the small
João Pais wrote:
At first, I just let that roll off. Over the years, I have come to expect
that kind of condescending attitude from some Finale users. Indeed, that
was my frist response to Sibelius (v.1) 10 years ago after years of
Finale
use (beginning with Fin 2.2).
probably that sounds
Sibelius and Makemusic both understand that most of their user base
are casual users. No shame in that. But it is true that Sibelius
works better for the casual user - by design - than Finale does. And
while there have been improvements in Finale's defaults, there is
still much room for
On May 22, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Sibelius and Makemusic both understand that most of their user base
are casual users. No shame in that. But it is true that Sibelius
works better for the casual user - by design - than Finale does.
And while there have been
Just read a cross-sample of the backgrounds of the users on the Sibelius
list --
There are people who are making arrangements which are performed at the
prestigious Proms concerts at the Albert Hall in London, there are
people whose arrangements and compositions are published by major
I've been in both probably since I started earning my living mainly
engraving, around 4 years ago - which is nothing compared with many of you
guys. of course it's true what you say - but in the sibelius list I
rarely/never saw a thread about good quality fonts, printers, binding,
editing
the little I know from finale tells me that it has the possibility to go
into much finer detail than sibelius - and has many things I would like to
see implemented in sibelius (I guess that it *might* happen sooner or
later - except if finale disappers).
Finale is *not* more capable of fine
On 21 May 2009, at 22:09, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 21 May 2009 at 9:45, Chuck Israels wrote:
On May 21, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
the Magnetic layout is all there really
is that stands out.
I agree, but that seems extraordinarily attractive.
I would second that (or, I
wrote:
From: Christopher Smith christopher.sm...@videotron.ca
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius 6
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 8:30 AM
On May 22, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Sibelius and Makemusic both understand that most of
their user base are casual users
suprise there is a way do do it all at once.
Mark McCarron
--- On Fri, 5/22/09, Christopher Smith
christopher.sm...@videotron.ca wrote:
From: Christopher Smith christopher.sm...@videotron.ca
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius 6
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 8:30 AM
On May 22, 2009
At 7:07 AM -0400 5/22/09, dhbailey wrote:
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah ... it's kind of like finding a church you like.
Sort of -- usually with finding a church you like, that's where you
stay, rather than finding two different churches you like and
alternating worship services between
Maybe one can chalk this up to newbie ignorance, but here's another
one against Sibelius:
Let's say you have a high flute, violin or trombone part with several
ledger lines, and the system breaks on a slurred passage. The
engraver's default is that broken slurs over a system should end a
Yeah, the linguistic analogy serves the best, I think. In addition,
when one abjures the religious analogy, one avoids any possible moral
consequences prescribed by a given dogma. Brings to mind one of my
favorite lines from Fiddler On The Roof, to wit, How can they both
be right?
Dean
It's been a few weeks since I've worked on a Band Score, but my
memory is that if I set up the score via the Wizard, and want to work
in Concert Pitch (which I always do), that the Bari Sax part is in
bass clef, and as soon as I toggle to Transposed Score, it appears
in Treble Clef
mu...@rgsmithmusic.com écrit:
Sure there are thing that Finale does better than Sibelius or that
Sibelius can't do at all. I know things that Sibelius does that Finale
can't and the MM people have admitted to me that it won't.
Could you give a few examples? I can think of Unicode support, but
You are correct. That was fixed in Version 5. The sutdents need to be sure
they select the right instrument. Bass reeds (and euphonia) have
instruments configured to read in several different ways. To fit American
conventions, they want to choose the one that is treble clef transposed in
a
You are correct. That was fixed in Version 5. The sutdents need to be sure
they select the right instrument. Bass reeds (and euphonia) have
instruments configured to read in several different ways. To fit American
conventions, they want to choose the one that is treble clef transposed in
a
Sib 6 answer: The slur now has 6 (I think) control boxes that can pull it
in many different directions. You can drag it with a mouse (clumsy) or the
arrow keys (elegant), and they can be adjusted independently in parts and
score. You really should check out the new slurs. They're greatly
improved.
Thank you! I will be sure to pass that on to my students. I am happy
to know that it was fixed recently.
If a student comes to me with a score that he DIDN'T use the Wizard,
what should I tell him? Obviously, use the Wizard next time, but
until then?
Christopher
On May 22, 2009, at 1:44
-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Christopher Smith
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:07 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius 6
Maybe one can chalk this up to newbie ignorance, but here's another
one against
Oo, nice! So my ledger line problem is a thing of the past? And
adjusting it in the part doesn't make it too ugly for words in the
score?
Christopher
On May 22, 2009, at 1:49 PM, mu...@rgsmithmusic.com wrote:
Sib 6 answer: The slur now has 6 (I think) control boxes that can
pull it
in
Thank you! I will be sure to pass that on to my students. I am happy
to know that it was fixed recently.
If a student comes to me with a score that he DIDN'T use the Wizard,
what should I tell him? Obviously, use the Wizard next time, but
until then?
Christopher
Make sure nothing is
On May 22, 2009, at 3:20 PM, mu...@rgsmithmusic.com wrote:
Thank you! I will be sure to pass that on to my students. I am happy
to know that it was fixed recently.
If a student comes to me with a score that he DIDN'T use the Wizard,
what should I tell him? Obviously, use the Wizard next time,
Hmm.
Am 21.05.2009 um 18:45 schrieb Chuck Israels:
Bill Duncan fonts
What's so special about them?
Gerhard
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
That's comon practise to have two masterfiles also in Finale. Use the
one for your score, and the other for the parts!
regards
Stigc56
Den 22/05/2009 kl. 14.43 skrev João Pais:
Just read a cross-sample of the backgrounds of the users on the
Sibelius list --
There are people who are
On 22 May 2009, at 19:49, mu...@rgsmithmusic.com
mu...@rgsmithmusic.com wrote:
Sib 6 answer: The slur now has 6 (I think) control boxes that can
pull it
in many different directions. You can drag it with a mouse (clumsy)
or the
arrow keys (elegant), and they can be adjusted independently
Christopher Smith wrote:
Thank you! I will be sure to pass that on to my students. I am happy to
know that it was fixed recently.
If a student comes to me with a score that he DIDN'T use the Wizard,
what should I tell him? Obviously, use the Wizard next time, but until
then?
In selecting
christopher.sm...@videotron.ca
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius (6 chord size)
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 12:18 PM
If you are using the Engraver default
with the Arial suffixes, this can be done. But did you do
this with the JazzCord library? If you increase the font
size, the kerning
At 10:18 AM -0700 5/22/09, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah, the linguistic analogy serves the best, I think. In addition,
when one abjures the religious analogy, one avoids any possible
moral consequences prescribed by a given dogma. Brings to mind one
of my favorite lines from Fiddler On The
Hi Gerhard,
There are things that look especially good to my eye: an elegant chord
symbol font with well spaced suffixes and reasonably easy control of
making new ones; softened slashes at a slightly more vertical angle
(allowing more of them in a measure, if needed); softened rhythmic
THERE IS NO OTHER HAND!!
Dean :)
On May 22, 2009, at 3:49 PM, John Howell wrote:
At 10:18 AM -0700 5/22/09, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah, the linguistic analogy serves the best, I think. In
addition, when one abjures the religious analogy, one avoids any
possible moral consequences
: [Finale] Sibelius 6
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 6:39 AM
Darcy James Argue wrote:
The demo video is really impressive. There are always
hiccups and stuff that doesn't work quite as well as it
could, but this feature set sure looks like a worthy
upgrade, with lots of notation
I'm actually very happy to hear that! It's entirely possible that on
the average, Finale users are just pickier and crankier than your
average Sibelius user. I doubt it, though.
I think the comments about Sibelius' general attitude toward users
are accurate, and their attitude is much
I thought it was kind of funny that Sibelius has now even put in crap
that Finale has had. Like singing in music. Which never works right.
Or dynamics notated depending on how hard you played a note. Finale
has had these for a while.
And I wonder how the Store thing is going to monitor for
On May 21, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
the Magnetic layout is all there really
is that stands out.
I agree, but that seems extraordinarily attractive. In fact, it is
more than I imagined to be possible (perhaps more a reflection of my
lack of programming imagination than
Yes, pitch before time is a great thing in Finale. Love it.
Well, hopefully Finale 2010 will have something similar to Magnetic
but I think we'll probably get something like goofy notation for kids
or automatic Pop music background generation rather than something
actually useful.
On Thu, May
Ye of little faith! It won't be that bad, but I don't know about
magnetic stuff this soon. How much faith is correct? Hard to know.
Chuck
On May 21, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Yes, pitch before time is a great thing in Finale. Love it.
Well, hopefully Finale 2010 will
At 1:07 PM +0200 5/20/09, João Pais wrote:
- sibelius' user base is (still) mainly based on
the people who use it lightly or for
industrial purposes, and not for serious
engraving. these persons are usually happy with
the program/standard output as is, and many
times don't go down enough
They are probably the same ones that vote for American Idol
singers..so90% doesn't mean right.
But whatever works. I won't switch until either MakeMusic goes under
or until Sibelius can open, natively, Finale files.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:36 AM, John Howell john.how...@vt.edu
At 10:53 AM -0700 5/21/09, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
They are probably the same ones that vote for American Idol
singers..so90% doesn't mean right.
Granted, of course. But whether or not they vote for American Idol
is entirely beside the point. They're our music majors, and
At 1:07 PM +0200 5/20/09, João Pais wrote:
- sibelius' user base is (still) mainly based on the people who use it
lightly or for industrial purposes, and not for serious engraving. these
persons are usually happy with the program/standard output as is, and many
times don't go down enough to get
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.comwrote:
They are probably the same ones that vote for American Idol
singers..so90% doesn't mean right.
But whatever works. I won't switch until either MakeMusic goes under
or until Sibelius can open,
On 21 May 2009 at 9:45, Chuck Israels wrote:
On May 21, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
the Magnetic layout is all there really
is that stands out.
I agree, but that seems extraordinarily attractive.
I would second that (or, I guess, THIRD it).
In fact, it is
more than I
At first, I just let that roll off. Over the years, I have come to expect
that kind of condescending attitude from some Finale users. Indeed, that
was my frist response to Sibelius (v.1) 10 years ago after years of Finale
use (beginning with Fin 2.2).
I'm actually writing to say how pleased I am
I would happily switch to Sibelius (I own version 5) if I could tweak
things like I can in Finale. If Bill Duncan's fonts/templates were on
it, and, more importantly, if there was a way to Natively open Finale
files. No XML, none of that. If Sibelius could open a Finale file and
have it
I have used Finale for years, almost from version 1. Is it hard to make the
switch as far as learning it?
Jane
On Thu, 21 May 2009 14:37:47 -0700, Eric Dannewitz ericd...@jazz-sax.com
wrote:
I would happily switch to Sibelius (I own version 5) if I could tweak
things like I can in Finale.
At 3:39 PM -0600 5/21/09, j...@janefrasier.com wrote:
I have used Finale for years, almost from version 1. Is it hard to make the
switch as far as learning it?
Easier than learning Finale from scratch, I'm told. But there are
certainly differences, and some of those differences are very
I'm so glad the paltform wars appear to be over.
don't get too excited yet, there is still to come the final
installment of the Fin-Sib war as the clans fight over who gets to
feed on the charred bodily remains of score...
___
Finale mailing
shirling neueweise wrote:
I'm so glad the paltform wars appear to be over.
don't get too excited yet, there is still to come the final installment
of the Fin-Sib war as the clans fight over who gets to feed on the
charred bodily remains of score...
Rumors of Score's death are greatly
Rumors of Score's death are greatly exaggerated. :-)
perhaps, but it *is* deathly ill. imagine the last 10 years of
finale's bugs, poor implementations and general errors crammed into
and you have the new windows version of score, their ONLY upgrade in
10 years.
that is pretty much how
Jane,
I HAVE used Finale since v1.0, for over 20 years. I made the switch
to Sibelius about 18 months ago. It was very easy and my karma and
attitude has never been better because of it. Try it, you'll like.
J D Thomas
ThomaStudios
On May 21, 2009, at 2:39 PM, j...@janefrasier.com
If you approach Sibelius as if it were Finale, you'll be frustrated. If
you're willing to let Sibelius be itself and change your working method to
fit Sibelius, you'll probably be very happy.
Finale and Sibelius think differently. If you think like Sibelius you'll
love it. But if you think like
Yeah ... it's kind of like finding a church you like.
Dean
On May 21, 2009, at 6:58 PM, mu...@rgsmithmusic.com wrote:
If you approach Sibelius as if it were Finale, you'll be
frustrated. If
you're willing to let Sibelius be itself and change your working
method to
fit Sibelius, you'll
That sounds fair enough. The only trouble is my entire computer
notation life was built ground up with Finale, so I find Sibelius
hard to get around.
Christopher
On May 21, 2009, at 9:58 PM, mu...@rgsmithmusic.com wrote:
If you approach Sibelius as if it were Finale, you'll be
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:52 PM, shirling neueweise
shirl...@newmusicnotation.com wrote:
Rumors of Score's death are greatly exaggerated. :-)
perhaps, but it *is* deathly ill. imagine the last 10 years of finale's
bugs, poor implementations and general errors crammed into and you have
On 20.05.2009 Matthew Hindson wrote:
And hopefully the slur improvements mean that one will no longer receive RSI
as a by-product.
From watching the video the slurs look very much like Finale's now,
only with even more control (which I am not sure I would use), and
possibly less bugs.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
The demo video is really impressive. There are always hiccups and stuff
that doesn't work quite as well as it could, but this feature set sure
looks like a worthy upgrade, with lots of notation-centric improvements.
I hope it spurs Finale to match Sib's new features,
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 20.05.2009 Matthew Hindson wrote:
And hopefully the slur improvements mean that one will no longer
receive RSI
as a by-product.
From watching the video the slurs look very much like Finale's now,
only with even more control (which I am not sure I would use), and
dhbailey wrote:
[snip]
As a member of the Sibelius group at yahoogroups, I have to say that
there I don't recall there being anybody who complains about the upgrade
schedule. And while there are those who don't upgrade due to financial
restrictions, I've never read that people aren't
On 20.05.2009 dhbailey wrote:
But for a down-and-dirty, do-it-in-a-minute worksheet or transposition for my students, I
still fire up Finale. But a send it to the publisher project I'm using
Sibelius most of the time.
Well, for me, this was simply not an option with Sibelius slurs prior to
Hi, I'm another sibelius (only) user
As a member of the Sibelius group at yahoogroups, I have to say that
there I don't recall there being anybody who complains about the upgrade
schedule. And while there are those who don't upgrade due to financial
restrictions, I've never read that
On 20 May 2009 at 13:07, João Pais wrote:
Finale
is the only program I know that only allows you to save in the latest
version (or am I not updated)?
This is very common for database programs, and Finale is built around
a database engine, and I've always assumed that explained the issue.
... is out
Apparently the magnetic layout feature is a real plus for engraving, saving
a lot of time.
And hopefully the slur improvements mean that one will no longer receive RSI
as a by-product.
http://www.sibelius.com/products/sibelius/6/index.html
Matthew
What is RSI?
Jane
On Wed, 20 May 2009 08:53:32 +1000, Matthew Hindson
mhindson2...@gmail.com
wrote:
... is out
Apparently the magnetic layout feature is a real plus for engraving,
saving
a lot of time.
And hopefully the slur improvements mean that one will no longer receive
RSI
as a
@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Sibelius 6
What is RSI?
Jane
On Wed, 20 May 2009 08:53:32 +1000, Matthew Hindson
mhindson2...@gmail.com
wrote:
... is out
Apparently the magnetic layout feature is a real plus for engraving,
saving
a lot of time.
And hopefully the slur improvements mean
Williams, Jim wrote:
Repetitive Strain Injury...from too much mousing and other futzing with slurs,
endings, etc.
Good thing that's never a problem with Finale, eh? ;-)
--
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
___
Finale mailing
On May 19, 2009, at 8:03 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Williams, Jim wrote:
Repetitive Strain Injury...from too much mousing and other futzing
with slurs, endings, etc.
Good thing that's never a problem with Finale, eh? ;-)
Mmphhh!
Christopher
___
The demo video is really impressive. There are always hiccups and
stuff that doesn't work quite as well as it could, but this feature
set sure looks like a worthy upgrade, with lots of notation-centric
improvements. I hope it spurs Finale to match Sib's new features,
especially the layout
96 matches
Mail list logo
