Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-20 Thread Ken Williams
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 08:49 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > Therefore: The instability in Apache::Request (A part of mod_perl) may > be due to the fact that mod_perl was unstable itself in the .so lib I wouldn't say so. I've had mod_perl working for a very long time, but Apache::Reques

Re: [Fink-devel] possible readline/ncurses problem

2002-02-20 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
Martin Costabel wrote: > I suppose Dave has libxpg4 installed. It has this effect. > libxpg4 sets the environment variable DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE, which > will break any binary that is compiled with twolevel_namespace (the > default) and has multiply defined symbols. I'd expect there are many >

Re: [Fink-devel] Evolution

2002-02-20 Thread Patrick Tescher
Well, sadly I lost the patch so most of my work is in my head. I'll try to write another one in the next few days, but it takes forever to compile. If someone wants to email me instructions on using Code Warrior to link it, I heard that speeds it up. If not it will be there in a couple of days.

BLT on OS X? Re: [Fink-devel] source navigator

2002-02-20 Thread rincho kuma
I joined source navigator's mailing list and asked the guys at redhat about the port and it seems they need BLT: From: Syd Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed Feb 20, 2002 02:34:19 PM US/Pacific To: Ian Roxborough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Gavin Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: [Fink-devel] Evolution

2002-02-20 Thread Justin Hallett
this isn't always good :P, but i agree when someone starts something doable they should start a tracker item. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >This just seems to be one of those packages that keeps getting worked on >and then abandoned, it would be nice if the next people who try have >somewhere to s

Re: [Fink-devel] Evolution

2002-02-20 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
Patrick Tescher wrote: > I got pretty far, just had a few problems with undefined variables in > the > calendar section. If you or anyone wants to try, I can help them. Would you mind putting your work so far (a patch file would be great) somewhere everybody can see? I'd recommend the tracker i

[Fink-devel] source navigator

2002-02-20 Thread rincho kuma
I filed a request yesterday after I failed to compile it myself. It's a wonderful tool and great for software development: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=520312&group_id=17203&atid=371315 The following lines are the problem I saw when I did a "make" after ./configure:

Re: [Fink-devel] RE: [Fink-beginners] Does gnumeric work ...?

2002-02-20 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 09:41 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: > You could SSH into shell.sourceforge.net, with your SF ID and password, > and > do it from there. :) If you can SSH then why not just set CVS_RSH to ssh and use that? I'm guessing he can't ssh. -- Finlay

Re: [Fink-devel] xdvi package and source tarball

2002-02-20 Thread David R. Morrison
Tom Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The xdvi package in stable does not compile from source as the source > tarball for version 22.48 is no longer present. Bumping the version to > 22.51 for the xdvi .info file gets the latest source tarball (at present). > 22.51 is also able to compile on OS

[Fink-devel] xdvi package and source tarball

2002-02-20 Thread Tom Kelly
The xdvi package in stable does not compile from source as the source tarball for version 22.48 is no longer present. Bumping the version to 22.51 for the xdvi .info file gets the latest source tarball (at present). 22.51 is also able to compile on OS X without the need for patching. Hope that h

Re: [Fink-devel] RE: [Fink-beginners] Does gnumeric work ...?

2002-02-20 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: > Yeah, so I'd suggest this: "man apt-get" :-) I thought I had done this (lame excuse, I know). > I did that mysself just now. There is an "--reinstall" option. Yes, thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for. Works, too. OTOH, this does not work for me: > Alternatively,

Re: [Fink-devel] RE: [Fink-beginners] Does gnumeric work ...?

2002-02-20 Thread Max Horn
At 11:32 Uhr +0100 20.02.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >Max Horn wrote: > >> Regarding gnumeric: we have this system lib version 50.0.0 issue, it >> might be nice if somebody wrote a mini package with a script that >> checks this problem and others, and automatically suggests (and if >> the use

Re: [Fink-devel] RE: [Fink-beginners] Does gnumeric work ...?

2002-02-20 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: > Regarding gnumeric: we have this system lib version 50.0.0 issue, it > might be nice if somebody wrote a mini package with a script that > checks this problem and others, and automatically suggests (and if > the users says "yes", also performs) and update of affected packages. >

Re: [Fink-devel] RE: [Fink-beginners] Does gnumeric work ...?

2002-02-20 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 20/2/02 8:28 PM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 14:28 Uhr -0500 19.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >> You may need to run "fink selfupdate" with the CVS option, before you will >> find the gnumeric-1.0.2 package, since it was added to fink's unstable >> tree after the previous fi

[Fink-devel] RE: [Fink-beginners] Does gnumeric work ...?

2002-02-20 Thread Max Horn
At 14:28 Uhr -0500 19.02.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >You may need to run "fink selfupdate" with the CVS option, before you will >find the gnumeric-1.0.2 package, since it was added to fink's unstable >tree after the previous fink release. > >I have had enough positive reports about this versio

Re: [Fink-devel] Evolution

2002-02-20 Thread Patrick Tescher
I got pretty far, just had a few problems with undefined variables in the calendar section. If you or anyone wants to try, I can help them. > Has there been any progress on porting Evolution? I realize it is a bit > of a nightmare since it depends on a zillion rapidly changing libraries. > > I'