[Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0a candidate)

2002-04-20 Thread David R. Morrison
Max Horn wrote: Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which already depended on that, you could just drop the audiofile dependency. But if now FOO is converted to BuildDepend on audiofile, and

Re: [Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0acandidate)

2002-04-20 Thread Max Horn
At 13:57 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Max Horn wrote: Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which already depended on that, you could just drop the audiofile dependency. But if

Re: [Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0a candidate)

2002-04-20 Thread David R. Morrison
Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 13:57 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Max Horn wrote: Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already depend on FOO which already depended on that, you could just

Re: [Fink-devel] shared library dependencies (was Re: 0.4.0acandidate)

2002-04-20 Thread Max Horn
At 14:15 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 13:57 Uhr -0400 20.04.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: Max Horn wrote: Also we uncovered this problem with the conversion to shlibs: So far, if you e.g. depend on audiofile, but already

Re: [Fink-devel] Problems with templates in C++

2002-04-20 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 03:25 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: I am working on porting a c++ program that I may bring to fink if I can get it to work, and I keep running into a problem. Every time I try to link two object files, one with a template the other needs, I get an error, for

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

2002-04-20 Thread Ben Hines
At 10:05 AM +0100 4/20/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote: The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a public beta release). Currently it's available only if you have an ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else over the coming week or so. Anyway, it includes a

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

2002-04-20 Thread Max Horn
At 14:06 Uhr -0700 20.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote: At 10:05 AM +0100 4/20/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote: The April 2002 Developer Tools is out (although it's classed as a public beta release). Currently it's available only if you have an ADC Seed Key, but it should become available to everybody else

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

2002-04-20 Thread Max Horn
At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 10:06 PM, Ben Hines wrote: According to the release notes, the default compiler is still 2.95.2. In PB you have to set USEGCC3 variable to use gcc3. More apropos to fink, I have the new tools installed, and cc

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

2002-04-20 Thread Ben Hines
At 11:14 PM +0200 4/20/02, Max Horn wrote: Might be. Hm, I haven't downloaded the tools yet, but didn't they want to ship a tool which allows you to switch between the compiler versions or something? Yep, yer right.. just read those notes.. (there are a lot of them) At 12:54 PM -0700

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

2002-04-20 Thread Ben Hines
At 11:14 PM +0200 4/20/02, Max Horn wrote: Note that this says *nothing* at all. Alls OS X compilers so far called themselves 2.95.2, yet there are substantial differences between the versions. If you really want to know what version it is, use cc -v Nothing? Seems to say enough to tell a

Re: [Fink-devel] April 2002 Developer Tools OUT

2002-04-20 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
I wish :-) or I wish that we cold at least share the wealth with each other... anyone have an extra seed key they don't use? :-) On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: Also, gcc is gcc3, and I