At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 10:06 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > >>According to the release notes, the default compiler is still >>2.95.2. In PB you have to set USEGCC3 variable to use gcc3. >> >>More apropos to fink, I have the new tools installed, and cc >>--version returns 2.95.2. >> >>HOWEVER, we now have "g++" on OS X! Apparently gcc3 is installed as >>"c++3", "g++" "g++3", "cpp3", etc. "cc" is still a link to gcc2. >>The existence of a g++ now might cause some configure checks to >>change/break... > >Also, "gcc" is gcc3, and I think configure scripts search that >first. Not to mention, we'll probably want to move to the gcc3 tool >chain ASAP anyway. :-)
Do we? Why? Mind you, I look forward to some of the nice new features of gcc3, but since the current tool chain is working perfectly well, and the new toolchain will probably break things, and is potentially buggy, I don't see why it's a "natural" descision to switch over ASAP... of course it's important to start testing with it ASAP, but moving over? Don't think so. Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
