Just checked in puf, a parallel URL fetching utility. We might
consider it as a downloader for fink.
To solve the "what if one fails?" problem we could check to see if
the files exist in src after puf exits.
-Ben
--
http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/
qt2-shlibs should in theory be able to co exist if someone makes the split.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Hi everyone!
>
>I was wondering if it would be possible for a qt2 package to be created,
>that would conflict with and replace the qt3 package. I currently have
>some
>packages (qcad, bbkeysconf
Hi everyone!
I was wondering if it would be possible for a qt2 package to be created,
that would conflict with and replace the qt3 package. I currently have some
packages (qcad, bbkeysconf) that do not work with qt3 (they have yet to be
updated), and there doesn't seem any way for me to be able t
At 12:12 Uhr -0400 10.05.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Should we deviate from fink policy and get ready to provide a zsh
>replacement for 10.0 and 10.1 users? for testing purposes and for if
>people do not upgrade to 10.2, the packages will still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Should we deviate from fink policy and get ready to provide a zsh
replacement for 10.0 and 10.1 users? for testing purposes and for if
people do not upgrade to 10.2, the packages will still work? we could
call it like nozsh-bash-2.xx or something,
> I can see two possible ways to fix this (and am open to suggestions
> for better schemes):
>
> 1) Add a user-controlled site-lisp directory to each of the emacs
> directories. So the tree would now look like:
>/sw/etc/emacs/site-start.d/
> /site-lisp
>/sw/etc/emacs21/si
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 09:58, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> > sorry to reply to myelf, but I forgot to say something. I have done
> > this before, and have had no apparent side affects with 10.1.3. I
> > removed /bin/sh, and copied bash to /bin/sh. everything still worked,
> > AFAIK.
>
> That's qui
Sorry for the continued cross-post. I'm not sure to which list this
thread should migrate...
On Thursday, May 9, 2002, at 04:02 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> It has come up recently on this list and on fink-users that the
> emacsen-common
> package is creating directories in /usr/local/share.
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 09:41 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
> This is all being done with bas as a symlink? has anyone tried copying
> bash to /sw/bin/sh and seeing if it still does not work? Bash entgers
> into sh compatibility mode when it is invoked as sh...I don't think a
> symlink is e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 09:41 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
> On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 08:55 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>> At 8:41 Uhr -0400 10.05.2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>>> On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>>>
Is it beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 08:55 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 8:41 Uhr -0400 10.05.2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>> On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>>
>>> Is it because of spacial chars in $verstring that break since it's
>>> not q
At 8:41 Uhr -0400 10.05.2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>Is it because of spacial chars in $verstring that break since it's
>>not quoted? What exactly is a value of "$verstring" that makes it
>>choke? It shouldn't be caused by spaces, since
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> Is it because of spacial chars in $verstring that break since it's not
> quoted? What exactly is a value of "$verstring" that makes it choke? It
> shouldn't be caused by spaces, since those would break zsh, too,
> wouldn't they?
There
At 5:03 Uhr -0400 10.05.2002, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
[...]
>Here's the patch for problem 3:
>
>diff -Naur gdk-pixbuf-0.16.0/configure gp-new/configure
>--- gdk-pixbuf-0.16.0/configure2002-01-22 20:11:48.0 -0500
>+++ gp-new/configure 2002-05-10 03:02:44.0 -0400
>@@ -333
Hi Dave. Those changes look good, and this is the type of change which is
not intended to alter the .deb file, so leaving the revision number alone
was correct.
However, I think you only modified the copies in the unstable tree, right?
Most stable packages are also duplicated in unstable, and we
Since 10.2 will be using bash as /bin/sh, I tried building some packages
with /bin/sh as a symlink to bash. Most things work fine, but there are
a few problems that need fixing:
1) Bash chokes on a Compile/Install/PatchScript that is just ";".
Instead, if you want to do nothing, just use 'echo
16 matches
Mail list logo
