On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 04:29 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Pejvan BEIGUI wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Hi there,
>> I just made a fresh install of 10.2 and reinstalled from scratch fink,
>> following the guide on the web site. Everything runned perfe
Pejvan BEIGUI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there,
>
> I just made a fresh install of 10.2 and reinstalled from scratch fink,
> following the guide on the web site. Everything runned perfectly, I'm so
> happy with that. Big big cheers to the team :-)
>
> while
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 09:42 AM, jfm wrote:
>
> Finally, only 2 packages 'depend' on libxpm : swi-prolog and wmmail .
> Do they really need it ? Or would the lib from X11 be OK too ?
> Would it be possible to
> a) either delete libxpm altogether, or
> b) have those 2 packages offer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I just made a fresh install of 10.2 and reinstalled from scratch fink,
following the guide on the web site. Everything runned perfectly, I'm so
happy with that. Big big cheers to the team :-)
while reinstalling lftp, I noticed that this pa
libxpm installs an older lib than X11 :
/sw/lib/libXpm.4.dylib (compatibility version 4.7.0, current version
4.7.0)
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.4.dylib (compatibility version 4.11.0, current
version 4.11.0)
libxpm causes trouble; when building fvwm2 with libxpm installed one
gets :
checking for Xp
When your packages are ready, you submit them for consideration by using
the "package submission tracker" linked from fink's webpage.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
There is also the problem that you might change the flavor of emac that you
installed, after installing some other package. Without a debian-like
system, you end up with unusable byte-compiled files.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsor
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
> 2. Does anyone ever actually install different flavors of emacs at
> once? Is the debian policy overengineered, and the simple approach of
> putting everything in site-lisp is sufficient?
Yes, for example, you sometimes use car
