On Montag, Jänner 20, 2003, at 05:08 Uhr, Carsten Klapp wrote:
I've done a lot of gettext work in PHP and C and often find I am
frustrated by it's limitations, never-mind the extra time to educate
English-speakers how to write _("translation-friendly") English
strings in our project's code
Hi,
Very informative article, perl Maketext sure sounds powerful!
I've done a lot of gettext work in PHP and C and often find I am
frustrated by it's limitations, never-mind the extra time to educate
English-speakers how to write _("translation-friendly") English strings
in our project's c
Heh, i did that last time didn't I. :)
I can remove them from the sql.
-Ben
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 06:01 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Hmmm... darwin-6.4-1... and macosx-10.2.4-1... whoops!
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
Hmmm... darwin-6.4-1... and macosx-10.2.4-1... whoops!
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL
I updated the PDB for 0.5.1.
If anyone ever makes a news item for 0.5.1, you can link to:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/compare.php?tree1=0.5.1-
stable&cmp=0&tree2=0.5.0a-stable
That is a list of all the new stable, binary packages since the last
release.
-Ben
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Montag, Jänner 20, 2003, at 12:27 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
Just found back that nice article about localizing perl programs on
CPAN.
http://search.cpan.org/author/SBURKE/Locale-Maketext-1.03/lib/Locale/
Maketext/TPJ13.pod
It's an
Just found back that nice article about localizing perl programs on CPAN.
http://search.cpan.org/author/SBURKE/Locale-Maketext-1.03/lib/Locale/Maketext/TPJ13.pod
It's an interesting read even if you don't plan to localize something
right now :-)
Cheers,
Max
-
Le dimanche, 19 jan 2003, à 21:45 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines a écrit :
Anyone have a working email for sylvain cuaz, his email just bounces.
which one ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? yes the mailbox to which it is
redirected was full, but I've just cleaned it up.
Clearly he is alive
yes, indeed =)
So I've been running into weird runtime errors when using libpng...
KDE and Qt had been updated to use libpng3 instead of libpng back in
the 3.1 betas. Unfortunately, it turns out that not everything KDE
links against has been, and it turns out that in certain situations, it
freaks out. :(
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 03:40 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
I can make a dummy package for it, but the question is how to check
for them.
- gcc version ?
- Look for receipt in Library/Reciepts?
- Look for "December 2002 Developer Tools" in
/Developer/Applications/Project
Builder.app/Contents/R
Anyone have a working email for sylvain cuaz, his email just bounces.
Clearly he is alive and working on fink, he just checked in some stuff.
-Ben
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Se
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 06:19 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Folks,
We clearly need a way for Fink to check whether the December 2002 have
been
installed, triggered by some indication in the .info file. As a few
recent
exchanges have indicated, there are some header files which are on
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 06:40 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"David" == David R Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Under many circumstances, "sudo apt-get remove foo" will do
David> what you want.
It's not clear to me from reading the manpage that this will also
remove recurs
As discussed a few days ago, there is now a new license option for Fink,
License: Restrictive/Distributable (for non-open source packages which allow
distribution of binaries). This is now documented at
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/policy.php#licenses
In addition, I have modified t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
> > "David" == David R Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> Under many circumstances, "sudo apt-get remove foo" will do
> David> what you want.
>
> It's not clear to me from reading the manpage that this will also
> remove recursively
> "David" == David R Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Under many circumstances, "sudo apt-get remove foo" will do
David> what you want.
It's not clear to me from reading the manpage that this will also
remove recursively all dependencies on foo (and thus is no different
than dpkg -
Under many circumstances, "sudo apt-get remove foo" will do what you want.
It would be great to be able to do this directly in Fink, but we will need
a more robust dependency-resolving code before we can introduce this
feature (or some other ones which would be nice to have).
-- Dave
I've repeated this cycle hundreds of times in the past year:
$ fink remove foo
...
... can't remove foo because it depends on bar
$ fink remove foo bar
...
... can't remove bar because it depends on bletch
$ fink remove foo bar bletch
... ad nauseum
Isn't there any way to say "fink remove foo-an
Folks,
We clearly need a way for Fink to check whether the December 2002 have been
installed, triggered by some indication in the .info file. As a few recent
exchanges have indicated, there are some header files which are only
present in that release; there are other features which are needed for
19 matches
Mail list logo
