Ok. I have finally committed ncurses 5.3, and just wanted to let
everyone know. I have verified that the previously missing symbols are
in fact there, and tested the libs with old and new ncurses progs, no
problems.
I also committed versions for 10.1, which i know at least a few people
use. I
I've made a patch for Fink which supplies a cctools virtual package:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=687178group_id=17203atid=317203
After some discussion on #fink, we concluded that this package should be
BuildDependsOnly = True, and as such, we won't need to make dpkg
There have been no updates to the Fink package manager for two weeks,
other then Ben Hines' adding 10.2.4 as a recognized OS X version this morning.
Max said he wanted to do more things before the next package manager release,
but I would prefer not to wait forever.
I propose that a few people
Hi,
I was talking to drm in #fink earlier, and he said I should email the
list with my suggestion for Fink documentation. I end up helping a lot
of people install, configure, or use Fink, and in my experience, when
things go wrong, it is often related to a $PATH error and .cshrc.
People get
Neal Parikh wrote:
[]
I wanted to suggest either changing the install instructions to use
~/.tcshrc or to at least make a note there that if you have a ~/.tcshrc
file, ~/.cshrc will not be read at all and Fink won't work properly. If
There is an FAQ entry #3.18 explaining this, added 2 months
At 21:15 Uhr -0700 14.02.2003, Ludwin wrote:
My Computer speaks french, and the Gimp software I have just
downloaded speaks mainly English. However, there is french as well.
I imagine fink can somehow detect that my ibook is in French, so
that Gimp shows some cammands in French. But this
I do not mind that much if we change to .tcshrc from a techincal
point of view. What I fear, though, is that we also will have some
troubles in the transition period. Basically not so advanced users
with a .cshrc based setup will start reading about .tcshrc. In the
worst case, they may start
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Max Horn wrote:
I do not mind that much if we change to .tcshrc from a techincal point
of view. What I fear, though, is that we also will have some troubles
in the transition period. Basically not so advanced users with a
.cshrc based setup will
At 15:29 Uhr -0500 15.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
There have been no updates to the Fink package manager for two weeks,
other then Ben Hines' adding 10.2.4 as a recognized OS X version this morning.
Max said he wanted to do more things before the next package manager release,
but I would
After suffering from extremely bad fink performance on my iBook in
the past couple months (despite the nice improvements recently done),
I begin to wonder if maybe we should reconsider our current package
DB indexing behavior.
The current approach is restricted in its performance by the fact
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 08:43 PM, Max Horn wrote:
After suffering from extremely bad fink performance on my iBook in the
past couple months (despite the nice improvements recently done), I
begin to wonder if maybe we should reconsider our current package DB
indexing behavior.
I
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 05:43 PM, Max Horn wrote:
To ease the developer's pain somewhat, we could add a fink index
foo.info command, which would add the specified .info file(s) to the
index. This way, you could just (re)index the files you are working
on, avoiding having to do
Sure, Max, I realize you are busy, and I'm not trying to make more work for
you!
I've revised my patch for the cctools virtual package, so I hope that this
can also be included in the next release.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
I can confirm this, the same thing happened to me once within the last
two or three days--due to a patch file which was no longer
present/pertinent. No insight to offer towards a solution, sorry :(
'sudo fink index' bypassed the problem.
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 10:03 pm, Ben Hines
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 03:18 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Ben Reed will use this in qt3 and kde, to detect whether folks have
upgraded
to the December 2002 tools or not.
Yup, just put together some test qt3 and kde packages and haven't had
any problems yet. The cctools dep works
15 matches
Mail list logo
