Yuhua Su wrote:
Hi,
I was attempting to download the package of Lyx, I got a a few problem,
though. Here is the information Terminal showed.
curl -f -L -O ftp://ftp.math.berkeley.edu/pub/Software/TeX/xdvi-22.61.tar.gz
curl: (19) xdvi-22.61.tar.gz: No such file or directory.
### execution of cur
Bill Bumgarner wrote:
[]
I would think that answering 'n' -- disabling passive -- would work much
better with firewalls. It is certainly a requirement for NAT
translating routers (airport base stations and cable/dsl routers,
included).
This is the world upside down. You are the first person
Title: Download package
Hi,
I was attempting to download the package of Lyx, I got a a few problem, though. Here is the information Terminal showed.
curl -f -L -O ftp://ftp.math.berkeley.edu/pub/Software/TeX/xdvi-22.61.tar.gz
curl: (19) xdvi-22.61.tar.gz: No such file or directory.
### execut
On Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003, at 20:38 US/Eastern, Ben Hines wrote:
Use passive mode FTP transfers (to get through a firewall)? [Y/n]
'n' to this question and it fixed the problem. That seems
counter-intuitive.
curl -P is the command to disable PASV, and use PORT instead:
man curl "-P
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 01:02 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
curl -P - -f -L -s -S -O
ftp://www-126.ibm.com/pub/jikes/1.18/jikes-1.18.tar.bz2
and now it works fine. I see that NOT setting 'ProxyPassiveFTP'
should do the same, but it appears not.
Actually, I just did a 'fink
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 08:09 AM, David wrote:
ld: RTThreadC.o has external relocation entries in non-writable
section (__TEXT,__text) for symbols:
restFP
saveFP
libtool: internal link edit command failed
Fatal Error: package build failed
*** execution of failed ***
any idea?
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 08:30 AM, Max Horn wrote:
What you describe above sounds like the "normal" way compilers are
bootstrapped. The question is, how did they obtain the original
Darwin/OSX M3 compiler then? Via a cross compiler? That's about the
only possibility I see, except
John Borwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been a problem for me, too, and I installed my own copy of
> 5.8.0 independent of Apple. The problem extends beyond Storable to all
> non-5.8.0-compliant modules.
>
> I think it isn't an Apple problem; it's a fink one. PERL5LIB needs to
> be
it works at least for the documentation of doxygen itself. so i guess
it is working. i cannot test it, because i don't have a project handy.
if someone uses it, please test it.
Thomas
Am Mittwoch, 19.02.03 um 14:33 Uhr schrieb Jan Ruzicka:
Works for me.
Doxygen compiles and runs.
How is the p
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:07 PM, "David R. Morrison"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Many of us are familiar with the following problem: user installs perl
5.8.0
replacing the apple-installed 5.6.0 (by following instructions on
apple's
website, for example), fink stops working because
Dear http://www.fink.sourceforge.net Owner,
We offer you e-mail addresses databases for advertisement
mailing; we sell databases also carry out mailing and hosting
for the advertising projects.
We can work on a turnkey project create a site with original design,
program and subject contents. Our d
I'm behind a NAT'ing non-proxying firewall and I could not update jikes
because the download failed. Specifically, this...
curl -f -L -s -S -O
ftp://www-126.ibm.com/pub/jikes/1.18/jikes-1.18.tar.bz2
... failed.
I modified NetAccess.pm such that the above became
curl -P - -f -L -s
Many of us are familiar with the following problem: user installs perl 5.8.0
replacing the apple-installed 5.6.0 (by following instructions on apple's
website, for example), fink stops working because it uses Storable.pm
which was compiled against 5.6.0, user either asks for help on fink lists,
or
I'm working on trying to package the sendmail milter for spamassassin. It
has some pre-requisites, and seeing as I've never made a package before I
could use some assistance. From the readme file:
"You need to have sendmail + sendmail libmilter (available since
version 8.11, afaik, 8.12.+ recomm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
What you describe above sounds like the "normal" way compilers are
bootstrapped. The question is, how did they obtain the original
Darwin/OSX M3 compiler then? Via a cross compiler? That's about the
only possibility I see, except maybe
At 17:08 Uhr +0100 19.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 19, 2003, at 05:00 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote:
Generally, on Fink we wouldn't distribute a binary built somewhere else,
we would make a package which builds our own binary. O
Do you have to install the bootstrap-binary? Or can you just run it
from the directory you are using to build?
If you don't have to install it, then it can just be one of the things
you download as "source" for this project. Fink would then use this
bootstrap-binary to create a complete modula3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Looking further into the issue I am running across this:
=== package /Users/mule/dev/Modula/m3-libs/m3core ===
+++ cm3 -build -DROOT='/Users/mule/dev/Modula' && cm3 -ship
- -DROOT='/Users/mule/dev/Modula' +++
- --- building in PPC_DARWI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 19, 2003, at 05:00 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote:
Generally, on Fink we wouldn't distribute a binary built somewhere
else,
we would make a package which builds our own binary. Or did I
misunderstand
the situation?
In ord
Ah yes, I should have mentioned that there is a project which *is* intended
to be multi-platform and to do many of the things which fink does (although
it is not as far along yet, particularly in terms of providing a binary
distribution and packages for users). That is the darwinports project,
htt
The fink package-manager can be thought of as a front-end to some of the
debian tools. To port it to another unix, at a minimum you would need
to port dpkg and apt, and I don't know how hard that would be. Then
you could, in principle, run fink there as well, but I'm afraid you'll
find there are
Generally, on Fink we wouldn't distribute a binary built somewhere else,
we would make a package which builds our own binary. Or did I misunderstand
the situation?
-- Dave
>
> > I just had a look at it. Seems that the binary distribution works fine
> > on 10.2.4
> >
> Actually it doesn't.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I just had a look at it. Seems that the binary distribution works fine
on 10.2.4
Actually it doesn't.
They are wanting libflex.a
now the question is how to handle that. We do have flex in fink.. I
will see what I can do
However, how will we g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
So it's not really a matter of not being curteous to you, and more a
matter of treating you like other core memebers/project leads :-)
Because you would wait for me to read up on mail worth four days? I
thought having proper media handling,
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:15:59 +0100
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-devel] A suggestion for the fink package Manager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello.
I would like to add the fink packager manager itself as a project to
Fre
Whereever it is getting the -arch i386 it isn't going to work on Mac OS
X as there are no fat libraries or compiler toolchain installed.
When building darwin there is an env var/make option. make RC_ARCHS=ppc
, what is required for this package I do not know, but you'll have to
change it.
Peter
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 09:26 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Exposure of "Fink", yes. Exposure of "fink" (the package manager), no.
I have nothing new to add to this discussion, but my opinion on the
matter mirror's Max's. I've got no problems with getting PR for "Fink"
the project, but I t
I am also having trouble getting MySQL-Python-0.92 to work on my fink
installation.
--MacOSX 10.2.4 - fink updates via CVS - stable tree only
Per the fink F.A.Q.
I have included the setenv variable declarations in my .cshrc
I have installed the required mysql items
[user#] fink list
At 11:27 Uhr +0100 19.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 19, 2003, at 09:32 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
?
Yes. First off, the package manager never was announced widely, and
there is no reason to do so with this release. I am not sure if we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 19, 2003, at 04:25 Uhr, Ben Hines wrote:
cvsup and modula3 have been ported to OS X:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=comp.lang.modula3
Thank you, I have been waiting for this.
Anyone care to have a crack at packagin
I agree with Max here. Users don't really need to know that we've updated
the package manager, except for those users who are nice enough to help
us test things, and they will see it on our web site or mailing lists.
And I would be very surprised if we ever attracted a developer who wanted
to work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
What is this sudden obsession with popularity and forcing ourselves
down the public's throat all the time? I really don't get it. Sure,
it's nice to be noticed, but it's better to be noticed legitimately
than repeatedly spam freshmeat. I al
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 10:27 am, David wrote:
I give a damn on being on the front page of freshmeat, to be honest.
But I do. Exposure is the one key issue, which will, amongst other
things, keep Fink alive and kicking. The fact, that Fink really is a
two part effort (package ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Februar 19, 2003, at 09:32 Uhr, Max Horn wrote:
?
Yes. First off, the package manager never was announced widely, and
there is no reason to do so with this release. I am not sure if we
should announce it *anywhere*, but IMHO at
At 22:15 Uhr +0100 18.02.2003, David wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello.
I would like to add the fink packager manager itself as a project to
Freshmeat. I know that we are already present with the distribution
but the package manager itself might be interesting to o
35 matches
Mail list logo
