Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/10.3 ChangeLog,NONE,1.1 apt.info,NONE,1.1 apt.patch,NONE,1.1 base-files.info,NONE,1.1 bzip2.info,NONE,1.1 bzip2.patch,NONE,1.1 cctools-extra.info,NONE,1.1 cctools-extra.patch,NONE,1.1 debianutils.info,NONE,1.1 debianutils.patch,NONE,1.1 dpkg-bootstrap.info,NONE,1.1 dpkg.info,NONE,1.1 dpkg.patch,NONE,1.1 fink-prebinding.info,NONE,1.1 gettext.info,NONE,1.1 gettext.patch,NONE,1.1 gzip.info,NONE,1.1 gzip.patch,NONE,1.1 libiconv.info,NONE,1.1 libiconv.patch,NONE,1.1 ncurses.info,NONE,1.1 ncurses.patch,NONE,1.1 storable-pm.info,NONE,1.1 storable-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 storable-pm561.info,NONE,1.1 system-perl561.info,NONE,1.1 system-perl580.info,NONE,1.1 system-perl581.info,NONE,1.1 tar.info,NONE,1.1 unzip.info,NONE,1.1

2003-06-28 Thread Max Horn
Am Samstag, 28.06.03 um 20:21 Uhr schrieb TheSin: no they won't that is what I changed Yup, you did. However, please next time when you make such major changes, at the very least post a message in parallel to fink-devel explaining what you did. Even better, put your changes into a .diff, into

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/10.3 ChangeLog,NONE,1.1 apt.info,NONE,1.1 apt.patch,NONE,1.1 base-files.info,NONE,1.1 bzip2.info,NONE,1.1 bzip2.patch,NONE,1.1 cctools-extra.info,NONE,1.1 cctools-extra.patch,NONE,1.1 debianutils.info,NONE,1.1 debianutils.patch,NONE,1.1 dpkg-bootstrap.info,NONE,1.1 dpkg.info,NONE,1.1 dpkg.patch,NONE,1.1 fink-prebinding.info,NONE,1.1 gettext.info,NONE,1.1 gettext.patch,NONE,1.1 gzip.info,NONE,1.1 gzip.patch,NONE,1.1 libiconv.info,NONE,1.1 libiconv.patch,NONE,1.1 ncurses.info,NONE,1.1 ncurses.patch,NONE,1.1 storable-pm.info,NONE,1.1 storable-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 storable-pm561.info,NONE,1.1 system-perl561.info,NONE,1.1 system-perl580.info,NONE,1.1 system-perl581.info,NONE,1.1 tar.info,NONE,1.1 unzip.info,NONE,1.1

2003-06-28 Thread TheSin
this is true but at this point only a small amount can test and discuss it, this was just to get things moving along so we don't wait to long like 10.2 :) and I don't think any of these changes where major :) maybe the prebinding but I figured instead of deal will incorporating it into 10.2

[Fink-devel] passwd on 10.3

2003-06-28 Thread Max Horn
David R. Morrison wrote: 1) Installing an old version of fink's passwd package under 10.3 will wipe the users on your system. We have to be absolutely certain that users have an updated passwd package in their tree under 10.3. AFAIK 0.5.3 ships with the latest passwd, which does not anymore

[Fink-devel] ABI Changes: 3.1 - 3.3

2003-06-28 Thread Max Horn
So, how to deal with the ABI changes (again). Let's first see what exactly we have to deal with: 1) We need to ensure that all the C++ code on a system is compiled with the same version of GCC, either 3.1 or 3.3. (exceptions can be made for C++ code which is completely self contained, i.e.

Re: [Fink-devel] ABI Changes: 3.1 - 3.3

2003-06-28 Thread TheSin
regardless I think this is a great idea and should be implemented even right now in 10.2 On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 02:07 PM, Max Horn wrote: Now, to ensure that really the correct GCC is used, we could insert our own symlinks for gcc into the $PATH during the compile phase - a bit like

NDA was(Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/10.3 ChangeLog,NONE,1.1 apt.info,NONE,1.1 apt.patch,NONE,1.1 base-files.info,NONE,1.1 bzip2.info,NONE,1.1 bzip2.patch,NONE,1.1 cctools-extra.info,NONE,1.1 cctools-extra.patch,NONE,1.1 debianutils.info,NONE,1.1 debianutils.patch,NONE,1.1 dpkg-bootstrap.info,NONE,1.1 dpkg.info,NONE,1..)

2003-06-28 Thread David
On Samstag, Juni 28, 2003, at 05:48 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote: One of the great things which Apple did last week was to publically release the source for all external opensource components of the WWDC Panther Preview. This means that we can discuss lots of changes that will be needed,

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 05:14 AM, Max Horn wrote: --- NEW FILE: IDEAS --- - decide on setting MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to 10.3 or not - all pkgs that need a depend on essential pkgs should list that depend - all pkgs that depend on ncurses will need a versioned dep as this version is bin

[Fink-devel] Re: NDA

2003-06-28 Thread David R. Morrison
It's the NDA you agree to when you join the Apple Developer Connection, either as an online member or as some other kind of member. I'm sure there must be a copy somewhere at connect.apple.com . -- Dave --- This SF.Net email sponsored by:

[Fink-devel] reorganizing documentation on CVS

2003-06-28 Thread David R. Morrison
Dear fink developers, As some of you know, we have a pretty slick system for generating our web pages, using xml source which is processed into php files. The same xml source can be processed into more monolithic html files, which are distributed these days with the binary installer. Also, some

Re: [Fink-devel] reorganizing documentation on CVS

2003-06-28 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 1:05AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I would appreciate any comments or feedback about this. Diffs attached below (for Makefile.common, the .dtd, the .xsl's, and the one .xml which requires the new varlink template. +1 Sounds like a great idea for me.

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/10.3 ncurses.info,1.1,1.2 ncurses.patch,1.1,1.2

2003-06-28 Thread David R. Morrison
OK, the ncurses issue is another complicated one. Both with fixing ncurses, and with the gcc 3.3 ABI change, we're going to need to so what we did last time and be careful to do two things: 1) give a new version number to pkgs with C++ code when they are moved to the 10.3 tree 2) make every