Le 19 août 2004, à 5:39, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit :
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
http://fink.so
Le 19 août 2004, à 5:33, TheSin a écrit :
Both look good to me, I like the second best, the only thing is that
it doesn't take in consideration multi maintainers in multi trees.
Maybe move maintainer to the table too, with ditto if it is the same.
It is not a bad idea anyway, since when there are
Le 19 août 2004, à 4:34, Daniel E. Macks a écrit :
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy p
Also, if you change the background color of just the 10.2-gcc3.3 row to
"#d0", the very pale yellow color clearly separates the three System
rows without being obtrusive.
Hanspeter
--
And when the last last law was down, and the Devil turned round on
you - where would you hide, Roper, the l
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
Both look good to me, I like the second best, the only thing is that it
doesn't take in consideration multi maintainers in multi trees.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 18-Aug-04, at 8:34 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Okay, two layout opti
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
The second moves back a bit towards the
When I try to do an update-all, I get the error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all
Information about 3872 packages read in 3 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for db42-ssl-shlibs already exists
This is what "fink list db42" produces:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> fi
On 18.08.2004, at 17:13, David R. Morrison wrote:
Well, I agree, but wakeonlan-pm has existed for some time, apparently,
which I didn't notice when I created net/wakeonlan yesterday.
-- Dave
On Aug 18, 2004, at 11:08 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
-pm means perl module, just a little script which happens
Well, I agree, but wakeonlan-pm has existed for some time, apparently,
which I didn't notice when I created net/wakeonlan yesterday.
-- Dave
On Aug 18, 2004, at 11:08 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
-pm means perl module, just a little script which happens to be
written in perl shouldn't be -pm.. shoul
On Aug 17, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Yarden Livnat wrote:
Hi,
Is there a place were we can talk about issues with fink and 10.4 ? I
have one particular package which behave strangely and I'm kind of at
lost. I don't think it's a fink issue though.
Thanks,
Yarden
Sorry, we don't have a place to talk abo
Hi,
Is there a place were we can talk about issues with fink and 10.4 ? I
have one particular package which behave strangely and I'm kind of at
lost. I don't think it's a fink issue though.
Thanks,
Yarden
---
SF.Net email is sponsored b
Hi Etsushi
On 18.08.2004, at 13:54, Etsushi Kato wrote:
Hi fink developers,
Could you apply the patch described on
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2003-01/msg00047.html
?
This patch is definitely needed for MacOSX's g++ to compile parsed
files by bison 1.875.
Thanks for reporti
Hi fink developers,
Could you apply the patch described on
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2003-01/msg00047.html ?
This patch is definitely needed for MacOSX's g++ to compile parsed
files by bison 1.875.
Cheers,
--
Etsushi Kato
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
