On 23 Sep 2004, at 2:31, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 11:00:39PM +1000, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
I'm trying to update some of my packages to use variants, and one of
these is pygtk. As it exists now, there is a -py22 version and a -py23
version, for the respective versions of Python.
On 23.09.2004, at 11:34, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
I don't think I made it clear in my original email, but what I was
attempting to also ask is if I can provide the pygtk-py23 and
pygtk-py22 variants from the same package description file, but not
allow the straight pygtk package to be installed?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:34:33PM +1000, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Alrighty. Thanks for the help, David and Dan.
I don't think I made it clear in my original email, but what I was
attempting to also ask is if I can provide the pygtk-py23 and
pygtk-py22 variants from the same package
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:42:44PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Benjamin,
Well I would suspect if the compatibility version were fixed it would
not be 3.7.0 since freeglut is considered to be 3.8.0 relative to the
glut versions.
Since it breaks some cases where glut works and is supposed to
Hi folks,
wanted to let you know that Eterm from the unstable list is working
great for me.
Thanks,
Julin
-- Package manager version: 0.20.5 Distribution version: 0.7.0.cvs Mac
OS X version: 10.3.5 December 2002 Developer Tools or later gcc version:
3.3 make version: 3.79 Feedback Courtesy of
