GCC4 Package (Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread kinako
Hi, On Feb 11, 2005, at 1:23, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Perhaps I'll make a gcc4 package a splitoff of gfortran - what do you think? GCC4 has several new features, including auto vectorization and tree-ssa optimization. It sounds very attractive that fink has gcc4 package. I have used some

gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything (c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason to split them up? As long as you added a prefix or suffix to the gcc and g++ executables so that they

[Fink-devel] Bug#25: xcb does not build

2005-02-11 Thread Alexander Hansen
Package: xcb Version: 2.4-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source I get the following: ... xcb-2.4/xcb.man sed -n -e '/^\.SH COPYRIGHT/,/^\.SH/ {s/^\..*//;p}' xcb.man Copyright sed: 1: /^\.SH COPYRIGHT/,/^\.S ...: extra characters at the end of p command ### execution of

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything (c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason to split them up? As long as you added a prefix or suffix to the gcc and g++

[Fink-devel] Bug-reporting system (was Bug#25: xcb does not build)

2005-02-11 Thread Daniel Macks
cirdan: why did finkbugs apparently send this to fink-devel instead of to Maintainer? Pkg was only added a day ago, so maybe finkbugs's pdb is out of date? Is finkbugs's pdb outdated, so does th On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:31:40AM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: Package: xcb Version: 2.4-1

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jeff Whitaker wrote: I think that there are other options hidden around somewhere, like enabling the gnu objc runtime as well as the apple objc runtime, should this be looked into? I see --enable-objc-gcenable the use of Boehm's garbage collector with

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Looks like --enable-threads=posix builds a libobjc-gnu.dylib ... gee, that's obvious, I spotted that right away (NOT!). Peter That's the default I guess, since I've already got that lib. I went ahead and checked in the gcc4 package if you want to give it a try (best to

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Alexander Strange
On Feb 11, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: I don't really know, I'm hoping others will hop in on this thread. I know Alexander Strange has been building gccs from the apple ppc branch, maybe a fink gcc4 package should come from there? Hmm - I'd like to hear about that. I doubt that

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything (c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason to split them

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

2005-02-11 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Can we get rid of the kernel's version-number in its installation directory? If gcc builds OS-version-specific stuff, we have a package portability problem... dan Dan: I haven't been able to figure out how to