Re: [Fink-devel] testing apt and dpkg

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 8:46 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/21/10 11:17 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: > >> On Jun 21, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > >>> PS: I still need testers for the new dpkg and apt! They can be found >>> in my experimental dir

[Fink-devel] testing apt and dpkg

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/21/10 11:17 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > >> PS: I still need testers for the new dpkg and apt! They can be found >> in my experimental directory (/experimental/dazjorz/finkinfo). They >

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL or libiconv problem?

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 6:17 PM, David Lowe wrote: > On 22 Jun, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> What package is failing? It's kind of hard to try to reproduce the >> error without knowing that. > > It's my experimental freeciv package. It'd

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jun 22, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > I've historically resorted to logging out and back in or rebooting > when > I've had this error. > Still get the same error after a reboot. - Koen. -- ThinkGeek

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL or libiconv problem?

2010-06-22 Thread David Lowe
On 22 Jun, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > What package is failing? It's kind of hard to try to reproduce the > error without knowing that. It's my experimental freeciv package. It'd built fine before today so even though i'd made some changes at the request of the tracker,

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL or libiconv problem?

2010-06-22 Thread Martin Costabel
David Lowe wrote: > This error just showed up during an 'update-all'. > >> #include >> configure:23968: result: no >> configure:23968: checking SDL_mixer.h presence >> configure:23968: gcc -E -g -O2 -I/sw/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 >> -D_THREAD_SAFE conftest.c >> In file included from

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL or libiconv problem?

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 3:48 PM, David Lowe wrote: > This error just showed up during an 'update-all'. > >> #include >> configure:23968: result: no >> configure:23968: checking SDL_mixer.h presence >> configure:23968: gcc -E -g -O2 -I/sw/include/SDL -D_G

[Fink-devel] SDL or libiconv problem?

2010-06-22 Thread David Lowe
This error just showed up during an 'update-all'. > #include > configure:23968: result: no > configure:23968: checking SDL_mixer.h presence > configure:23968: gcc -E -g -O2 -I/sw/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 > -D_THREAD_SAFE conftest.c > In file included from /sw/include/SDL/SDL_types.

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 11:31 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 16:41 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Well, there is always good old "grep", which gives the list below of 245 >> .info files containing the string "libjpeg-shlibs" in my u

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Sjors Gielen said: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 16:41 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Well, there is always good old "grep", which gives the list below of 245 >> .info files containing the string "libjpeg-shlibs" in my unstable tree. Some >> of those may not be really dependencies, but mo

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 22 jun 2010, om 16:41 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > Well, there is always good old "grep", which gives the list below of 245 > .info files containing the string "libjpeg-shlibs" in my unstable tree. Some > of those may not be really dependencies, but most probably are (I didn't

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Max Horn
Am 22.06.2010 um 15:27 schrieb Sjors Gielen: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Sjors, >> >> may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many more >> packages which depend on libjpeg instead of libjpeg8. Maybe those packages >> are the

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Sjors Gielen said: > Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: >> >> may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many >> more packages which depend on libjpeg instead of libjpeg8. Maybe >> those packages are the ones that are used by KDE / Qt ? > > These are o

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 9:27 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Sjors, >> >> may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many more >> packages which depend on libjpeg instead of lib

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > Hi Sjors, > > may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many more packages > which depend on libjpeg instead of libjpeg8. Maybe those packages are the > ones that are used by KDE / Qt ? These are only the pack

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Max Horn
Am 21.06.2010 um 22:42 schrieb Sjors Gielen: > Hello Dave, Justin, Alexander, William, > > I am sending you this e-mail to inform you that one or some of your packages > depend on libjpeg-shlibs and/or builddepend on libjpeg. I have seen > libjpeg-related crashes on various machines, most prob

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 6:17 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > >> Do you have a process limit set for your shell? > > Not that I am aware of. > > >> What does 'ulimit -u' say? > > 266 > > >> Does this probl

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jun 22, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > Do you have a process limit set for your shell? Not that I am aware of. > What does 'ulimit -u' say? 266 > Does this problem repeat if you build again, with less user > processes running concurrently? (The default value for the user > p

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 22 jun 2010, om 05:17 heeft Koen van der Drift het volgende geschreven: > Building your apt fails on my iMac G5, with 10.5.8; dpkg went fine. Thanks for trying! Let's see. This looks weird... > config.status: executing default commands > make[262]: Makefile:11: fork: Resource temporarily una

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 21 jun 2010, om 23:42 heeft William G. Scott het volgende geschreven: > If you would be willing to make the fixes, I would be especially grateful. > I'm trying to get my NIH grant renewal finished. > > I "inherited" the package from Jack Howarth, but am not particularly > qualified to maint

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hi David, First of all - > P.S. Two of the packages of mine which you mention -- imagemagick1-shlibs > and libdjvulibre15-shlibs -- are in fact old (perhaps obsolete) versions of > packages which exist in newer versions in fink. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO > REASON TO CHANGE OBSOLETE PACKAGES to

Re: [Fink-devel] Fixing libiconv (build-test needed)

2010-06-22 Thread Daniel E. Macks
David Lowe said: > On 13 Jun, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > > On 10.6/32 bit: > >> 1) with fink libiconv-dev installed, >> 2) without libiconv-dev, > > #2 gives me the extra line "libtool: install: warning: > `../lib/libiconv.la' has not been installed in `/sw/lib'". > >>